G Huxley

Our environment won't.

There is too much truth in those words for you to fathom. "- advantage over who/what?" Canada and its environment. "taking from who/what... how and where?" Canada, its people and its environment. The funds it takes for the process, the land that is given away, the resources it takes. The species driven away from their habitats. Ask yourself this: How many cedar forests are there in Lebanon? "invaders... clarification please." If they enter the country and don't leave then they are invading. "destroying the environment... relative to what reference, how, what environs/ecosystems/etc." Each human on the earth leads to a massive destruction of the environment, through the massive extraction of resources, taking up of land, wrecking eco-systems etc. "debasing our country... how?" The more people in a country per capita the more miserable, polluted and impoverished it becomes. Don't believe me? Go live in Nigeria, Egypt, India or China.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komagata_Maru_incident#Return_to_India

The British shot them.

That's the way I saw it as well. The thing ended up looking like a rugby scrum or football scene rather than parliamentary procedure.

Of course not, it was the natural survival of a people, when their survival was in question and they were being threatened by being overrun.

Why is it racist when you have a state, which is part of an empire to pick and choose who enters? Is it racist that Japan allows no immigrants? Was it racist when China built the Great Wall to keep out the Mongols? Was Gandhi a racist for wanting the British to leave India? Was it racist when Joan of Arc drove the British out of France? Was it racist when Alexander Nevsky repulsed the Teutonic knights? Was it racist when Dmitry Donskou repulsed the Mongols? Was it racist when the Russians repulsed the French and Germans?

The Komagata thing wouldn't have been apologize worthy if they weren't shot when they got back to India.

That's fine actually. I don't mind if all the refugees are 104.

I sort of think I get what you were saying although it was worded very difficultly. I think Canada and its environment are worth defending tooth and nail for. If you don't think Canada and its environment are all that important, then that speaks of an incredible lack of values and an incredible lack of appreciation for what Canada really is, just how amazing it is and just how fragile it is. Nature abhors a vacuum and Islam and others will gladly fill that vacuum with their own values/population. As the great Islamic historian Ibn Khalidun wrote: civilization becomes decadent, then as a result gets overrun by outsiders, who have grown hard and tough in the world outside. This is the repeating cycle of human history. Those that don't care for what they have, don't realize what they have and aren't willing to defend it, will be overrun and destroyed.

I don't understand your question.

Why? Its a slow motion train wreck. Or like the frog in boiling water, where the water temperature increases so slowly that the frog doesn't notice its boiling.

This parliamentary scene actually looks like a football game seriously and the follow up monday morning quarterbacking.

Yes, I'm aware. I'm not arguing in favour of the thread title. I realize that it is absurd.

It furthers taxes Canada's resources and the environment.

The conservatives apply Christian morality and Neo-Crusaderism to mess up all these countries in the first place and to create all these refugees. The liberals and others on the left then apply Christian morality to call to take in all the refugees from the places the conservatives have messed up. So we are being ruined by the left and the right. Both are two sides of the same disastrous coin.

Someone alert the Canadian military at once at all the violence it has engaged in.

This whole episode shows how parliament has been filled with a bunch of drama queens.

It is Christian morality leading to the destruction of the west. It praises all that is meak and shuns all that is strength.

"Ah ... yes ... let the weak and most vulnerable die in refugee camps." Why would they die in a refugee camp?

You don't understand the nature of Islamic people do you? I've traveled through numerous Islamic countries. They believe in very high family sizes. The Islamic govts use refugees as a weapon of colonization against the west.

Defending your country and your environment is ridiculous?

Why were the NDP crowding the floor and blocking the Whip btw?

They need to return to their countries. That means NATO needs to stop destroying their countries and stabbing them in the back. We don't need to be colonized and have our environment further destroyed by overpopulation.