lukin

no spin - I answered your first question and suggested I would steer you to existing MLW posts that answer your second question... it only takes you responding to the actual questions posed - to you! again: the above quote is quite 'matter of fact', hey lukin? You surely can't have difficulty in responding... or, is there a problem? I'm undecided. I would like for you to answer my two simple questions though....waldo.....waldo.....waldo???

And your a moderator.

Thanks for the spin, however, spin is not what was required. I see you have a hard time answering direct questions.

Waldo, do you believe humans are causing climate change? Why or why not? Waldo, if humans continue to do what they are doing, how many degrees C do YOU(not a cut a paste option)think the temperature would rise by 2030? Thank you for your time, waldo, and I look forward to your response, as you are the resident expert. Have a great day.

Waldo, your ship has sailed. Your cut and paste posts make little sense. You have zero credibility.

Waldo, you are very vague and you don't stray to far from generic generalizations. I don't think you know what you think you're supposed to believe.

The alarmists are losing steam. Too bad. http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,813814,00.html

Public education is nothing more than a steaming pile of bullshit fed to people who don't have a clue.

Exactly! All day kindergarten is definitely not about the kids. It's too bad there are so many stupid parents who buy into this crap.

Really? You're serious? Really?

Link??? Mike.

Proving what a big fool wyly is = priceless. :lol:

She is an irrelevant twit/kook so I guess she at least has something in common with you, squid.

Not everyone is a fan of the Jets logo. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDGde9eWuiQ&feature=player_embedded

The idiot waldo's god is David Suzuki. Waldo is very religious.

Boo hoo from baby waldo. Anything walnut doesn't agree with is rigged. What a joker.

Monty, you fool. You worship disposable heroes.

A couple Detroit Lions mocked Tebow.....they have struggled since. Coincidence??

Again you are wrong.

That's all hearsay. I don't subscribe to hearsay.

AGENDA21 ????????? WTF are you talking about, waldo. WTF is wrong with you?

Oh, here we go again. Sources that support waldo's BS are credible, all others are false. give it up buddy. Humans DO NOT contribute 14% to all the atmospheric carbon. It's under 5%. And that 5% does not alter climate Monte Hieb is much better educated than The Original Internet Ninja, Waldo.

I wouldn't want to interrupt Waldo and Mikey's reaffirmation session. Just how much of the "Greenhouse Effect" is caused by human activity? It is about 0.28%, if water vapor is taken into account-- about 5.53%, if not. This point is so crucial to the debate over global warming that how water vapor is or isn't factored into an analysis of Earth's greenhouse gases makes the difference between describing a significant human contribution to the greenhouse effect, or a negligible one. Water vapor constitutes Earth's most significant greenhouse gas, accounting for about 95% of Earth's greenhouse effect (5). Interestingly, many "facts and figures' regarding global warming completely ignore the powerful effects of water vapor in the greenhouse system, carelessly (perhaps, deliberately) overstating human impacts as much as 20-fold. Water vapor is 99.999% of natural origin. Other atmospheric greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and miscellaneous other gases (CFC's, etc.), are also mostly of natural origin (except for the latter, which is mostly anthropogenic). Human activites contribute slightly to greenhouse gas concentrations through farming, manufacturing, power generation, and transportation. However, these emissions are so dwarfed in comparison to emissions from natural sources we can do nothing about, that even the most costly efforts to limit human emissions would have a very small-- perhaps undetectable-- effect on global climate.

So 86% of carbon in the atmosphere comes from natural sources, and 14%, according to YOU is human created?

Thanks for NOT answering my question. That's why this forum is useless. Simple questions can't get answered...tney are danced around. 100% carbon...how much is created by humans? That's a simple question.