Moonbox

Lost what? A low effort trolling contest? OKAY 😆

pee pee poo poo

2/10 troll.

Normal mentally healthy people don't post 40 times a day, or toss thousands of insults annually on a single internet forum. Gnash and wail and project all you want, but there's no getting around that. This forum has literally never seen a bigger no-life than you. 🤣

So...the people who disagree with you. 🤣 You're describing +95% of your content on this forum - most of it just you making up positions nobody holds to debate against, and then squealing about them lying when they won't own the position they never took but you insist on them taking. It's absurd, but keep doing if you please. It's some funny shit. Not disgusting, just retarded.

At this point surely you can see how ridiculous you look telling everyone you debate that they're lying and running away from you...How many thousands of times do you have to do it before you realize you're the problem? 🤣 That's a really nice self-affirming narrative you've got there buddy-boy.

It's beautiful that you two have found each other and can support one another. 🙃

Except you do, constantly and observably. You're still doing it to me here, and you've done it to multiple people throughout this thread with near-zero justification. The only thing you've been able to successfully refute is that you don't do it literally 100% of the time. Your hyper-literal interpretation of my wording is the only rebuttal you can muster. 🤣 An accusation you repeat probably dozens of times daily, to anyone and everyone who disagrees with you. FORMAL DISCLAIMER for USER: Any phrasing to the effect of "anyone, everyone, all of the time, always etc..." is for rhetorical purposes and is not intended to be taken hyper-literally and used as an escape hatch through which to run away. An accusation you repeat dozens of times daily, to anyone and everyone who disagrees with you. 🤡

...and yet I have repeatedly conceded that I didn't mean to have you take my statement hyper-literally as you have, and I do so again here. For some reason you just can't get past it. 🙃 Too bad you say that to everyone all of the time. When you're spastically repeating the same retarded accusations over and over vs anyone you debate, nobody pays attention to it anymore. FORMAL DISCLAIMER FOR USER: Any phrasing to the effect of "anyone, everyone, all of the time, always etc..." is for rhetorical purposes and is not intended to be taken hyper-literally and used as an escape hatch through which to run away. Because you say so?? The idea that I'm supposed to address your limp insults line by line is some funny shit! 🤣

You're like a parrot: You're a pathetic liar cowardly. You're a lying coward! You run away like a cowardly liar! 😭 My entire line of argument is about how you ridiculously call people who criticize Israel terrorism supporters. Your only rebuttal to that is that I happened to say you did it to everyone/anyone. I've already conceded that you may not do it to literally everyone, but that makes me a liar...and somehow means that you don't keep calling Israel critics terrorist supporters??? Why would I respond to your stupidity line by line when it's just you petulantly calling me a liar and making up my positions for me? You keep demanding I defend points I'm not even making. This is the sort of content you think demands a response? 🤣

...he says, while "bravely" running to the rhetorical escape hatch of hyper-literality and pedantry. 🤣 The criticism is that you routinely smear criticism of Israel as pro-Hamas. Pointing out that you don't do it 100% literally every time isn't the great defense you think it is. Here you are talking about my framing again. I pointed out how ridiculously dumb your analogy was. No you generally respond to what you want me to have said, with the dumbest possible "framing" and interpretation attached to it. As for running away, here I am, right in your face mocking you. The amount of time you waste trying to convince yourself that people are afraid of (rather than bemused by) your kindergarten logic is remarkable. Are you trying to look retarded?

Hope you feel better after that, buddy boy. When the key point is that you keep calling people who criticize Israel terrorist supporters, it's remarkable how your defense is that you don't literally do it every time. 🤡 No I did not. I told you it was retarded to compare firefighters rescuing people from burning buildings to Israel dropping bombs in urban areas...because it is. When you want to debate what I actually say, vs what you want me to be saying, I'll engage more seriously. As long as you're just making shit up, I'll just keep making fun of you for it.

I can imagine all sorts of conversations you might have with our resident Tucker Carlson regurgitator, but it doesn't change your observed behavior here. Did I say that, or is that your retarded interpretation? As usual, you're debating the argument you want to be up against, rather than anything that's actually being presented. 🤡

Except all that matters is what's happening in these debates and on this forum. What you do in your private life in your own time is not my concern, nor relevant to this discussion. All that matters is you consistently (and stupidly) reframe anyone who criticizes Israel on this forum as a Hamas supporter. That's literally 100% make-believe, because there's no such comment. 🤣 No, analogy is supposed to show similarity, and though people generally misuse it as a rhetorical device, you've offered a masterfully brain-dead one. Comparing Israel's military action in Gaza to firefighters rescuing people from a burning building is utterly ridiculous. Firefighters don’t level the building, bury the occupants under rubble, and then insist the destruction itself was the rescue. Here's that buffoonish and binary reasoning you keep peddling. Who ever said Israel's actions need to be perfect? You're demanding I answer questions from a fundamentally dishonest framework in the first place. Ask a reasonable question and I'll answer it. Ask dumb ones and I'll just point out how dumb they are. When you're ready to be behave like an adult and debate the things people say, rather than your childish re-imaginings thereof, you'll have a better time here.

Yet it's what you keep doing, so complaining about me calling you out on it falls rather flat, doesn't it? Since you're making up my position in the first place, any "logical conclusion" you're drawing from that is your own make-believe. 🤣 I'm being specific on substance, you absolute clown. You asked me to explain why your analogy was retarded, and I did so. Your intention behind the analogy doesn't change how retarded it was. I don't oppose them dropping bombs. I was highlighting how retarded your analogy was, which is what you asked me to do. I could certainly critique the kinds of bombs being dropped and their utility vs collateral damage, but that would require the sort of substantive debate from which you'd certainly run away.

I do, but it's not the great point you think it is. It doesn't matter if you don't literally call anyone who criticizes Israel a Hamas and terorrist supporter. It matters that you do it here whenever anyone critizes Israel. The idea that critiquing Israel means we think they're not allowed to fight back or defend themselves, as you keep claiming over and over and over again. Yes, a retarded analogy. Like the ape you are, you've taken a tool you don't know how to use and applied it as stupidly as possible. Literally any two things can be used for analogy, but the rhetorical impact of the comparison depends a lot on context and situation, and how similar they are. In your case, comparing fire fighters rescuing people from burning buildings is about the dumbest comparison you could have made to dropping bombs in urban areas (killing people). Great job, you absolute m0r0n.

I can prove that you've done it multiple times to multiple people in just the last few pages of this thread alone. 🤣 No, I'm mocking your point and your objectively retarded reasoning: Not only do you present an absurd dichotomy of choices that simply doesn't exist, you're also projecting opinions and ideas that nobody here has expressed...other than you. You can't see how comparing firefighters rescuing people from burning buildings, to air strikes and 2000 lb bombs being dropped on buildings, is not the brilliant analogy you thought it would be? Really?? Yikes.

No, you responded to the back half of the question - the easy and conditional corollary - ignoring the whole point of the question. You squealed and complained and went pages refusing to answer a simple yes or no question. Except it's not a generalization. It's demonstrable and you keep doing it: The above is absolute nonsense. It's your imagination, and your need for a dumb strawman to debate, because you're not smart enough or honest enough to debate in good faith. What question was that, again? Maybe I'll answer it if you ask me a dozen times...after I give you some retarded analogies about firefighters etc...

Again: You evaded the whole point of the question. I was asking if reasonable limits could be applied to Israel's response. It was a really simple question, and it only required a yes or no answer, but you squealed and raged against it for days instead of answering and allowing us to move on. 🤣 You claim that, except you reframe any criticism, or questions/scrutiny of Israel that you encounter as support from Hamas, so what's that claim really worth? You know that as a matter of logic, this doesn't stand, but you do it anyway: Except none of the above is based on anything I've said. You've assigned motives and beliefs on me that I've never held or expressed and that exist solely in your head. You need me to be a ridiculous Hamas supporter and to absurdly deny Israel's right to defend itself for anything you're saying to make any sense.

No I addressed that pretty clearly: So there you are, "lying" again. 🫠 There we go! He did it! Days later and after probably a dozen tries, he finally answers! AMAZING! It's not a game, either. This is a framework for further debate on the subject. If reasonable limits exist, actions can exceed them If actions can exceed them, they can be criticized Therefore criticism is =/ supporting the opponent If you can accept this logic, then perhaps you can finally get over your juvenile, non-stop efforts to reframe anyone criticizing Israel's (now years-long) response to October 7th as a Hamas supporter. If that's the case, we can actually start having a substantive debate without you constantly derailing things with your ret*rded hyper partisan tribalism.

Yes, you can respond however you like, but like a 5 year old playing checkers, you make the rules and they only apply to your opponents. Your questions and your "points" all require answers (otherwise it's "running away") but evasiveness and obfuscation are the hallmarks of your content on this forum...along with juvenile and compulsive accusations of dishonesty...🤡 Regardless, you did not answer my question. In your bloviating, self-indulgent novel of a response, you did highlight: I didn't ask if Israel is doing whatever it wants, so that's a useless remark. You deliberately evaded the core question and instead answered the downstream implication. I asked (remember, this is yes or no😞 Did the October 7th attack give Israel carte-blanche to do whatever they want in the region, and make them immune to criticism. I'm not asking the question for no reason. I'm trying to establish a simple framework for the debate, and you're doing everything you can to avoid clarity. Why? It's because you can't handle clarity in debate. You need to keep things in the muck.

No, I can see that you responded to a yes or no question with a full-page of storytelling, dumb-beyond-belief analogy, and ridiculous projection about my motivation and tone. Again, you're debating against the argument you want me to be making, rather than the one I'm offering. This is what you always do. Here's the question again. Answer yes or no: Did the October 7th attack give Israel carte-blanche to do whatever they want in the region, and make them immune to criticism? I'm looking for a one word answer. There's a reason why this is so hard for you. You need the water to stay muddy.

The question was: Did the October 7th attack give Israel carte-blanche to do whatever they want in the region, and make them immune to criticism? This is a yes/no answer sort of question. When you muster the bravery to respond to that, we can proceed. Your response largely avoids answering and is a longwinded attempt to reframe criticism of Israel as opposition to their right to defend itself. That's a substituted (and ridiculous) position that nobody here has taken, but it's the one you'd prefer to argue against and therefore the one you keep projecting. 🤡

Pay attention to me please! I am relevant! -Confux

I'm happy letting people go back and read that exchange. I don't need to whine and cry and insist on how I need to believe it played out, as you are doing here. You never answered the question. I'll ask again here, and please remember, the answer is "yes" or "no". 🤡 Did the October 7th attack give Israel carte-blanche to do whatever they want in the region, and make them immune to criticism? You won't answer, just like you didn't in the thread you linked. You're going to run away and cry more because actually answering that question highlights some uncomfortable concepts your brain can't handle.