Moonbox

You've been posting long enough here and know better than to just throw a link out without quotes or explanation. Give us a quote and an actual argument to review otherwise it's pretty hard to respond. You know better and you are better than most of the conspiracy clowns here.

I don't understand much of anything you say, to be honest. Your posts are like mental spaghetti and so incoherent it's hard to even begin typing a thoughtful response.

That's not right man. The SoC has the final say on what is and what isn't Constitutional. The Minister of Justice can't just rule whatever he/she pleases.

I'd like to refer you back to your posts the other day lamenting how unfairly you were being treated. Here you are in all of your glory. Remember this next time you want to doltishly pretend you're the victim. ?

The Laws still have to pass legal scrutiny. Folks can challenge Laws in court and if the justices agree then it's all over. The minister of justice doesn't get to just do whatever he/she wants.

and I agree with the mandates and disagree completely with the protestors, soooo what is it you figure we agree on here???

Except you were quoting me on something that we definitely didn't agree on. Whoops!

I don't know anymore. Ask them. One moment I'm a communist, the next I'm a fascist. I can't really keep it straight anymore.

It was a good characterization of your reasoning. There's really no worthwhile response to an imbecilic comment like, "You're just like Nancy Pelosi." The best part is that the mental energy I expended on posting that meme was at least equal to (likely higher) than the buffoonish post it was responding to. Cheers man. Thanks for the laughs.

Yerp I'm just like Nancy. I'm a Nancy Pelosi communist fascist CNN-loving freedom hater right here.

DUDE! This isn't proof of what you're saying at all! HAHAHA! ? I just watched the damn thing and they said the protests were mostly peaceful until later on in the evening, when things got worse. You've decided that because he doesn't characterize the protests as you would (as violent rioting or terrorism), they're supporting violent protests. This is pathetic reasoning, but explaining why is a wasted effort on you. I'm honestly laughing my ass off right now. I need to walk away for awhile. My god. Thanks for the laughs.

Sure it does. Substantiate your claim. I know you find it almost impossible to provide proof or citation for anything you say, but the percentage absolutely matters. It's completely absurd to suggest it's not. By your boneheaded logic, if ONE dude somewhere maybe had a heart complication (related or otherwise) or if there was even claims that he did, that would be enough justification.

You and I both know he won't have an intelligent answer for this.

You don't even understand what substantiating means, or at least have no idea how to do it properly. Just posting link and getting angry about what's being said doesn't count!?

In what world do you figure we agree on this issue? It would be hard for me to have more contempt for the trucker protest and its demands, regardless of the fact that I'm tiring of the mandates myself.

and no less worthy of eyerolls.

No you didn't. You dumped a bunch of links and then ranted about how you didn't like what they were saying. That's not substantiating anything. The only thing you proved was that they were saying things you disagree with. I'm not sure you even understand what substantiating means based on this. Nope. You repeating it doesn't make it more true either. "Everyone knows" is proof positive that can't back up what you're saying with facts or reason.

Always interesting to see your opinion on what Canadian patriots do, lol.

This is standard conspiracy clowning. "It is well-known" or "Everyone knows," is code for made-up bullshit you can't substantiate. Of course in your circus-show echo chambers, everyone there might "know" what you're talking about, but just because you surround yourself with other fools that believe the same delusions doesn't make them any more true.

OR the majority in this case uses common sense and doesn't rely on massive webs of world-spanning conspiracies to justify their logic. That's the better and simpler explanation.

Everything is bad! We need to DO SOMETHING!

If the Courts suck, then what does waving the Charter around accomplish, especially if you disagree with the most important parts of it? I'll answer for you. It's because you goobers are warping your brains into pretzels to make reality fit your fantasy. If you don't like what's being reported in the news, it's FAKE. When you don't like what doctors and scientists and health organizations/authorities are saying, they're all compromised. If you disagree with the government's decisions and legislation, they're communists or fascists or whatever evil you think sounds coolest today. If you disagree with the Courts, they're corrupt. When these are your answers to literally everything, it's clear how far you've descended into your delusions. Every time you repeat one of the above, the rest of Canada rolls their eyes at you and you further confirm what we already know - you're adult children having tantrums.

Well that's good because the government doesn't decide. The Courts do, and they're not elected officials that have to worry about placating voters. If you don't believe in the Courts and the Rule of Law, then waving the Charter around is pretty stupid. betsy I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of how vaccines work.

Why don't you do a 30 second Google search and read the Courts' reasoning yourself? Pulling yourself away from your mind-warping conspiracy websites for a moment might do you some good - more good than vapidly repeating your slogans like a broken record. I've posted links to these decisions to others here recently. I'm not going to keep doing it for every boneheaded conspiracy theorist that wants to cluelessly wave the Charter around. Do yourself a favor and look up some of these court decisions, then actually read the Charter. If you had even the slightest understanding of it, you'd spare yourself some of the cognitive dissonance that's been upsetting you lately.

We do know what happens with the vaccines in two to three decades - nothing. Your ignorance and superstition regarding vaccine science is nothing anyone here is going to convince you of, but it's the swamp your mental fortress is built on.