Alta4ever

I think you have to much time on your hands. Its got to be a scary scary world for conspiracy theorists.

Did anyone listen to Adler today. They made a great point about this non story. Their is a certain hypocrisy to this, the liberals talking about security when they actively sent MPs to Tamli Tiger fundraisers. Not to mention what is an association? Kind of a lose word, she has never been charged with anything. This has been nothing but another smear campaign from the start. This is disgraceful behaviour from both the liberals and the media.

Time for the rhetorical question. Why was it the liberals changed the participation from optional to manditory the year after they brought it in?

I doubt the left will agree with us. But they are predictable, although we know why the liberals are so quiet on this one. The money went into general revenue, it was nothing but a number on a ledger there was no fund behind it. The money was used long before this government came to power. At least the CPC is doing something about it so future left wing governments can't just use the fund as a tax.

Apposed to the disgusting content on the CBC. If people want ot watch it they can support it. I for one do not watch the CBC and its leftist social engineering. I am tired of my tax dollars being wasted on these programs, if you want to watch you pony up the dough. My tax dollars can be better spent elsewhere.

Is that right, pleasae show me where in the blue book you would find that policy? Do you really think the CPC will lose to Dion? He will hand the CPC victory.

So.... There is only one poll that matters and that is election day. We'll see what happens when people are actually faced with the choice of higher energy prices due to an ill thought carbon tax, or the sanity that is true conservatism.

This had to be the biggest non story of the year, along with Cadman and all the other non issues the liberals have been whining about.

You need a broadcasting corp to make you feel Canadian?

Ya the Winnipeq free press is an unbiased paper.

Peer reviewed means nothing. Who is the peer are they actual climatologists or are they just geneticists? Global warming alarmists are nothing more than a cult of Statist professional protestors, who have found another vehicle to push their agenda of wealth redistribution.

It must be the right thing to do if your so upset about it.

If suzuki said it then it must be right

If you didn't mean it that way why would you say it that way? Or is it that whole thing of trying to paint the center right as scary? Nice Spin

Well well well look who likes to sling the mud, but can't take it when slung back. Look who thinks they know what will help or hinder the center right. Ah for the days of a weak divided right wing, when any fool could take the liberals to a majority even with only 36% of the popular vote.

No you just pointed out the arrogance of the liberal party.

I maybe understand your complaining when there are more tories then liberals on the supreme court benches, until that time your whining will fall on deaf ears.

Are their any liberal lawyers left who haven't been given a supreme court post?

The million dollar policy didn't exist/wasn't offered. The details about the campaign help were released to the media. The questions were answered you just didn't like the answer. Admit you were wrong.

The questions were answered, you just didn't like the answers.

Give it up. You are wrong, the liberal party was wrong. Time to swallow your pride and admit you were wrong.

I'm sorry you can't get your head around the RCMP investigation results. You were wrong and just can't admit it.

Looks like you are the only one complaining.

The answers have been given, they satisfy the Cadmans they satisfy the RCMP, the only people they don't satisfy are the liberals and you. You have been proven wrong, the liberals have been proven wrong.

Obviously 'm not the one having reading comprenhension problems. They are talking about historical levels, but they have no data that acurately shows what the historical levels are, they admit this in the artical, but you seem to miss this point. Although they do know they have fairly acturate data from 1970 on they are showing a population increase/steading between then and now. So without a longer time horizon on data how can they acurately gauge what the historical average was before it was effected from hunting and habitat change? Your arctical is full of holes.