Alta4ever

what you are refering to has nothing to with fundraising it was to with election spending BIG DIFFERENCE. It was the liberals that had the problem with elections canada over fundraising or do you forget adscam?

Realy I seem to recall that the conservatives have the largest fundraising machine. I seem to recall a few large leadership loans which have crippled a certain party who has got nothing left in the bank to fight a campaign.

Tory $500 per plate lunch, When was the last for those, I haven't sen one publisized in years, but I am sur etheir is the odd one in some ridings, but you really don't like those, then I don't think you can support any party, as they all do those $500 per plate events, remeber the liberal "auction" a couple of years ago were they encouraged the attendees to spend more then the donoation limit? The fact is progressive liberal expensive fundraiser dinners are don by every party and if you don't think the liberals do them as well as other parties you are ignorant

No if I want the sci-fi channel, or some other specialty channel from the US I can't get it because we have space.

No in our programing we are required to take certain channels, and if the is a channel that the CRTC deems as the Canadian equivelent of the American channel we only get the canadian one.

I would rather have that because it would then be veiwership that would decide not someone with a social ajenda.

The CRTC is the mistake.

how about give the consumer the choice of whether or not they want it, but then we have the liberals to thank for the CRTC telling us what we should watch, and what crap our tax and advertising dollars should support. Its time for the CRTC and CBC to disapear from Canada, lets make our own choices instead of letting some government civil servant tell us what our choice is.

listen to tthe liberals cry...they don't like getting in return what they dish...suck it up

give it up buddy, one book of 704 pages, considering, you have one book in which you have used a google seach engine to search the text is suppose to convince anyone? Considering Churchill put more words to paper than any other writer ( just one book in his history of the second world war was over 716 pages at it was one of six books), you won't find all references to Churchill in one book that was published in 1965-66. So please do you have anything more then one google search you did because a great quote with much meaning doesn't fit your view of society, economics, prosperity and government? what Reagan said was " The idea that a nation can tax itself into prosperity is one of the crudest delusions which has ever befuddled the human mind." Little different than the quote that was attributed to churchill isn't it.

I never was quoting reagan, I was quoting what I had read, which appears to have been said in 1903 by Churchill in the house of Commons We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.

Maybe its radio signals in his fillings. Or has the spagetti monster been telling waldo this.

Actually oleg hit it right on the head. But your ignorant views on what common might mean gets in the way of you understanding. As I said in my first post aplies to you, arrogant elitist liberal pricks.

I beleive they should be replaced with common people and have a very short expiry date on their service before the power has had time to corrupt them. Much of the civil service is waste anyway people who have no real use or power so they exploite the little we give them. The governmetn and the civil service need to be drastically reduced.

There is a quote from the wise Churchill that goes something like the following A nation is as able to tax itself into prosperity as one is able to stand in a bucket and lift himself up by the handle.

Ah but to liberals they beleive that they are above the rest of us, and how dare we think for oursselves or want something different from what they the ruling elite want, the arrogant pricks they are.

Havung the taxpayer foot the bill isn't compasion its stupidity. We Can have a universally accessible healthsystem, that isn't 100% taxpayer funded.

What banker friends...I always have seen liberal banking friends. Power corp anyone.

Again another great post.

healthcare isn't free and if you think it is you are deluding yourself, it entails a huge cost. Health care should be availible to everyone and they should not be discriminated against by class, but it is not free and should not be treated as such.

It is about him and what the government sdoes to adversely effect the current economy. By spending o much borrowed money on "social programs" he is leading the economy down further.

I doubt he will or can, he has shown in the weeks since taking over the presidency that it is all well just above the knowelege and ablity of this community organizer.

Ignore what was said, unfortunately the i told you so, will come at the expense of many millions of people who just didn't deserve it.

Spin spin spin....don't get too dizzy.

You seem to like the perpetual bad record which is socialism and socist policies. Something tried over and over in the last 100 years and all atempts have either failed or turned in to dictitorial states. so like I said whatever helps you sleep while Obama destroies and pushes the world from recession into depression.