AngusThermopyle

Actually I merely asked if you could post some of this "evidence" or at least some form of proof of its existence. As I mentioned it would go a long way in bolstering your cedibility. It actually should be quite easy if so much evidence does exist. I for one am curious as to how and which ones were doctored. So could we see something to show us this please? Oh, I see, a trial. What a curious coincidence, pretty much every time I've asked for links, proof, whatever, the information has been tied up in a trial and unavaillable. What a curious coincidence. Every time, who would have thunk it? Well sorry for having doubts, its now obvious to me why it can't be revealed.

How very interesting. Would it be possible for you to take a break from insulting other posters here long enough to post some of this "forensic evidence"? How about some of the "physical evidence". I'm sure many here would be interested in seeing it and it would also bolster your credibility tremendously to do so.

Hmmm, not only did Micheal Jackson die but also Farrah Fawcett. She died Thursday after a long struggle with cancer, thats a true shame.

Thats a pretty bold statement, especially when you consider bands like Queen, Jethro Tull and Yes, who all put on absolutely superb shows and actually had first class musicians in the bands. Sorry, no Ramones song has ever or will ever compare to the likes of Zeppelin and Queen.

This statement is all I need to hear in order to know you've never owned a Pit Bull or spent much time around them. They're great dogs and have only earned the reputation they have because of stupid wanna be tough guys. Of course McSquinties answer was to ban the dogs, knee jerk and stupid, far easier than addressing the issue of stupid wanna be tough guy owners. In the past Pit Bulls were known as Nanny dogs because people would buy them for their children. The dogs would protect and watch the children. Really Oleg, you should learn of what you speak before deciding to squeak loudly. Sorry for the thread drift but I just couldn't allow such a false and stupid statement to go unaddressed.

Whatever reason you choose to believe is irrlevant, did you come up with any credible answers to my questions? Or will you attempt to deflect the question? That would tend to indicate a lack of credibility.

Sorry Bill but not all of us old guys were Into Kiss or any other variation of that cheap glam heavy rock rip off style that they pionered. I saw Yes for their Tormato tour, the final one before they split up, I saw Queen for their Jazz and News Of The World tours, Jethro Tull for their Stormwatch tour, Peter Gabriel Secret World and before that PG Security. These are just a few of the great bands I've seen, If Kiss ever even got to play at any of these concerts they'd be very minor players. The old Max Webster with Kim would have not only blown them off the stage but out the front door. When you've seen the likes of ELP, the Moody Blues and the most important of all...Clapton, its hard to take Kiss seriously, the predecessors of Honeymoon Suit that they are.

Sure, go ahead and laugh but I'll have you know that some time soon...or...fairly soon I'm going to be fabulously wealthy. I have lot's of Nigerian friends. Good rich friends. For many years now. Good friends.

Why am I not surprised by your response? It's all a big stinky pile of lies, right? The live footage shot was just a Hollywood illusion, right? The baby girls tied to crude wooden chairs with a pot under their ass were just child actors staged for the filming by the Chinese government, Right? Get real.

I find it strange that some people would deny or excuse the Human Rights abuses of the Chinese government. Watch the following video's and try to deny any abuse, I first saw this back in the nineties and was shocked then, I'm still shocked now. Visit My WebsiteThis is 1 of 4 2 of 4 3 of 4 4 of 4 So, is this all just lies?

Isn't that what it always boils down to. We've learn't so much about these things but we still remain so ignorant. At the end of the day only time will prove us right or wrong, time is the ultimate arbiter in these matters, but as none of us will ever see the end result it becomes a topic of speculation, although we may be vindicated eventually in our beliefs. (backed by solid scientific methodology of course.)

I wasn't sure which topic I should post this in but this one seems the most appropriate. This a decidedly "Green" topic So what do you grow? If you grow anything at all. Where do you grow it? And, how do you grow it? Do you use organic methods, or perhaps you prefer artificial methods, maybe a mix of both? Do you agree with herbicide/pesticide bans? Do you think totally organic is the way to go? Or do you think we need more research and development of both chemical and natural pest control? Since I moved back to Ontario (some of you may remember that I was living in Alberta last year) I've found a really nice place on about an 1 1/4 acres in a really nice location. The earth is very rich and black, prime growing dirt actually. So my girlfriend and I decided it would be a true waste not to use it, that mean't planting. I like to grow things that I can use rather than flowers and shrubs so we decided to concentrate on growing plants that are both practical and beautifull. So far we have the place divided up into sections, we have an area prepared and tilled for the Lettuce, Muslix, Squash, Watermelon and some Tomato's amongst other things. Then we have part of that area segregated for the Herbs and Spices. Altogether this part totals around 20' *80'. We also have an area about 25' * 100* that is reserved for sweet corn of several varieties, a hardy plant, out behind the house we just finished building a 12' * 10' Greenhouse that will house the more exotic/delicate plants. In order to prepare the land we first had to eradicate the natural growth, I will admit we did use some artificial substances to do this, but once the land was ready to till we used only natural additives, two truck loads of sheep manure to be exact, plus one of cow. This involves a lot of tilling and garbage/weed picking from the soil but I think it will result in some nice plants with the least practical or long lasting disturbance to the land (actually if you drive your hand into it you'll find yourself with a nice handfull of black earth interspersed with marble sized balls of manure and dirt). Given what we've planted I'm projecting a surplus of about 2 to 3 hundred percent above what we'll consume this year. We'll disburse of this surplus through friends and a few modest sales by our neighbour who sells vegetables and fruit. The ramifications of this are that we will have a lower "Carbon Footprint" and actually be acting in a manner that will, presumably offset this quasy mythical concept. By growing our own vegetables and herbs etc. we are reducing the use of fossil fuels (just ask my aching muscles), by growing a surplus we are reducing that same fossil fuel use for others. Some of our friends can now eliminate a trip to the grocery store to get vegetables, with all the associated costs that the trip entails. Things like the fuel used by the guy growing this stuff in the first place, then the fuel used to harvest it and ship it. This brings us to those who live in major metropolitan areas, what can they do? Well they can plant and grow, there are now many Tomato strains that grow well in large pots, even indoors. Herb and spice gardens can grow indoors or in limited space outdoors. For those lucky enough to not have to live the heart of major metropolitan areas there are much more varied options available, those people usually have a least a small piece of land they can use. So for myself I realise that much as I would like to be the "Green" practical grower I have to bow to reality and as such I realise that I do have to use some artificial means to accomplish that goal. In order to offset those artificial means I strive to use methods and practices that will replenish the land. That means a lot of tilling and also hands on digging prep work. Personally I believe most people don't like to do this sort of thing because it means they'll get their hands dirty. But thats just my opinion.

All though you've paraphrased a bit, thats a very old and cliched saying Oleg.

Exactly. Yes, we must abide by the law as it can be practically applied in these circumstances, but some bruising is very far from shattering it into a thousand pieces. Does any one honestly believe that when captured these guys just say "oh, you won that round, well done, well off we go now". No, they resist and fight, as AG said, its not a gentle or kind process at all, not one grounded in a spirit of cooperation, quite the opposite in fact.When I was still in if some combatant was resisting and threatening my buddies life I would take him down as quickly and efficiently as possible, if that meant a boot toe to the temple then thats what he got. Notice I didn't mention safely? Thats because conflict is not safe and during conflict the last thing you worry about is the enemies safety, in fact the goal is to make your enemies life as unsafe as possible. So these guys are captured and have some bruises to show for the experience, thats pretty much to be expected. The simple fact is that as a member I quite often sported bruises, whether from conflict, training or just physical exertion and fun the bruises were present on a pretty regular basis. So it appears this Prof was just digging in the dirt, wasting time and money to further a personal agenda. It can't be denied that many such fools exist in society and we, as a just society give them ample opportunity to show the rest of us just how big a fool they really are.

That has to be one of the most ignorant things I've heard in a very long time. You should be ashamed, I dare you to step onto any base and repeat it to a few of the "Racoons". Didn't think you would. I guess it's better to be a living Racoon than a worthless piece of *^%$ as some here obviously are. Sorry everyone, that comment truly angered me, especially when one considers the source.

In this case I tend to agree with Oleg. A flag is a highly visible and widely recognized symbol of the country it represents. One would think it would be of some importance that it be made in the country it represents. Some things should not be valued merely on a dollar scale, some things should transcend the benchmark of a few pennies difference. I believe the National Flag should be one of these things. Sorry, I was distracted, its the Provincial flag, not National. Even so I still believe they should be made in Ontario, not China.

Thats a relief. I thougt I was the only one having trouble affording a new shoulder launched SAM and a few arty shells.

Well that previous link certainly would tend to indicate that there is no hidden agenda on the behalf of Muslims. It also serves to highlight just how splendidly they appear to integrate and adopt Canadian values. very interesting indeed.

Thats all very nice but I think cost might be a major consideration for MLW. Its also very possible that traffic and load is no where even close to what you have to contend with so such a setup would be a little overkill to say the least.

I just caught up to this thread. Is this meant to be serious? I mean when I read it I laughed long and hard and automatically thought it was some sort of particularly deranged Monty Pythonesque skit. I also really liked this part although I am a little disturbed by the realization that we've apparently suffered a mass invasion by Socialist Muslims intent on killing all our women for their honour and to allow (presumably) baby bonus to stretch further, or something like that.

It could also be said that Obama brings nothing to the table but ideas, and no substance to back them. However its still very early days, give it a year or two and lets see how he does.

I have to disagree with your assessment. It most certainly is the business of the townspeople. The regular flow of traffic and commerce has been disrupted, Swastikas have been spray painted on peoples homes, power has been disrupted to the town, townspeople have been intimidated, school children have been intimidated. So how much would you say it would take before it becomes their business? As for the legality of what six nations has done, please, don't be absurd. When has setting fires on routes of transport ever been legal, when has destroying power transformers ever been legal, when has assault ever been legal? These are all activities that six nations has engaged in. As for your OPP and RCMP theory, well surely your toaster can do better than that. If that is not so you'd be able to provide some form of proof other than the ridiculously dubious "I remember reading somewhere". By the way, hows your 2010 Olympic boycott going?

So it appears that Wild Bill was pretty much spot on in his assessment of the advertising situation. Of course only the severely delusional would attempt to deny any hard feelings between these communities after all that has occured.

If it would probably take hundreds of millions of years to occur then what are you worried about? The odds are that the human race would be hundreds of millions of years gone by that time. In fact that presents a paradox, if we are gone from existence then we couldn't mine to that extent and this unlikely event would never occur at all.

Hey man! That happens all the time don't you know? Planetary bodies just flinging themselves off into space willy nilly all over the place. Gravity be dammned!