scribblet

Pathologist says Brown was shot from the front and the head wound suggests he was leaning forward (could be charging) Surely by the time the third autopsy is done there will be degradation of evidence. There`s info here that suggests the witness were lying . A previously unnoticed detail in a background conversion of a video taken minutes after the Ferguson shooting could change the course of the investigation into Mike Brown’s death. (if it's even looked at by the authorities) The original video poster appears sympathetic to the narrative that Mike Brown was shot unarmed with his hands in the air. But he unknowingly picks up conversation between a man who saw the altercation and another neighbor. Eyewitness: Michael Brown Ran from Cop Car, 'Doubled Back' and Charged at Officers. It also so far corroborates what the radio caller said in a previous link I posted. http://www.ijreview.com/2014/08/168698-eyewitness-recalls-important-detail-background-video-mins-ferguson-shooting/

I’d like to know why they are looting Asian stores to get even with white cops, how is looting Arab and Indo-American stores a protest against white cops? More to the mix http://www.ijreview.com/2014/08/168698-eyewitness-recalls-important-detail-background-video-mins-ferguson-shooting/

Have any you heard this, it's a friend of the family telling the other side on a talk show. I guess there's no way it can be verified but hear for yourself. She says ballistics will prove he was not shot in the back, among other things... http://danaloeschradio.com/alleged-friend-of-officer-darren-wilson-offers-his-side/

Clearly there is nothing more to see here other than speculation and unfounded accusations, try as you might there is nothing to see, sometimes a cigar is just - well - a cigar... but carry on. http://www.torontosun.com/2014/08/15/robocalls-scandal-was-overblown?token=1636830c505caaade505dec0eaf50b4a

Sometimes it really is what it is, and all it was, was Sona and a buddy... nothing more.

The police use that term and it's been used numerous time on CNN live, nothing to do with a blogger.

It did change everything, it made it legal for the cops to pull him over. I never excused the actual shooting, but we are all sitting here making statements without all the evidence. Now, it appears that the cop didn't know about the victim being part of a robbery, so it changes back again to the beginning. Incident report http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2014/images/08/15/ferguson-police-report.pdf

I don't know anyone who is condoning it, least of all me so quit with the insinuations.

The robbery changes everything including destroying the credibility of the witness who claimed Michael was shot for no reason. Plus the store owner will be a witness. The other 'witness' was involved in the robbery, but no doubt they will claim the video was ‘doctored’. We still need to see the pictures of the officer's beaten face and hear his side of the story as it still isn't clear as to why it was necessary to shoot him with his hands up. A police report indicates that Brown was a “primary suspect” in the robbery that took place the day he was fatally shot. According to the report, Brown got physical with the convenience story employee over a box of cigars worth $48.99 he was trying to steal. http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2014/08/15/state-troopers-walk-side-by-side-with-thousands-of-protesters-in-ferguson/

Elections Canada has finished his investigation as posted, as far as I know they are not going any further. I'm not aware of anyone else being charged or another investigation, do you know have a source for that. As for a 'veil of secrecy' - that's funny considering the thousands of articles the media has poured out.

Where did he say that - he only said it's likely he didn't act alone. He probably did have a partner but there was nothing said about wider fraudulent activities, unless you have a link to that Judge Hearn told the court he was "satisfied well beyond a reasonable doubt" that Mr. Sona was involved in the plot, though he added "the evidence indicates he did not likely act alone." http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/former-conservative-staffer-found-in-robocalls-trial/article20057224/

I suppose with higher incomes income taxes are naturally higher and this report does go back to 1961. According to many reports the CPC have cut taxes a lot, and according to a pretty vicious article in the Star last year, they cut way too much. Canada’s budget watchdog says Canadians are paying Ottawa about $30-billion less this year – or a little less than $1,000 per person – due to tax changes introduced in the past decade. The Parliamentary Budget Officer calculates in a new report that personal income taxes have been cut by about $17.1-billion through a variety of changes introduced since 2005. Despite some criticism in this area, the PBO says the lion’s share of the tax savings have gone to low middle income earners – households with incomes between $12,200 and $23,000. http://www.macleans.ca/economy/money-economy/federal-tax-cuts-since-2005-net-canadians-30-billion/

Ellie Wiesel Noble Laureate and holocaust survivor who speaks very eloquently here http://www.algemeiner.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Elie-Wiesel-Hamas-Child-Sacrifice.pdf In my own lifetime, I have seen Jewish children thrown into the fire. And now I have seen Muslim children used as human shields, in both cases, by worshippers of death cults indistinguishable from that of the Molochites. What we are suffering through today is not a battle of Jew versus Arab or Israeli versus Palestinian. Rather, it is a battle between those who celebrate life and those who champion death. It is a battle of civilization versus barbarism .................. But before sleepless mothers in both Gaza City and Tel Aviv can rest, before diplomats can begin in earnest the crucial business of rebuilding dialogue... the Hamas death cult must be confronted for what it is. Moderate men and women of faith, whether that faith is in God or man, must shift their criticism from the Israeli soldiers – whose terrible choice is to fire and risk harming human shields, or hold their fire and risk the death of their loved ones – to the terrorists who have taken away all choice from the Palestinian children of Gaza. I call upon the Palestinian people to find true Muslims to represent them, Muslims who would never voluntarily place a child in danger. I call upon President Obama and the leaders of the world to condemn Hamas’ use of children as human shields.

Trust has to be earned and up to now Hamas has not earned any trust. Israel isn't stupid enough to accept their terms knowing that opening the borders and trade would result in an arms buildup for Hamas. Is there any reason for us to believe that Hamas would NOT bring in more fire power and build up their arsenals with the intent of obliterating Israel after this ten year truce? So far there is nothing to indicate Hamas can be trusted. It's not only Hamas either, there are other splinter groups doing their own terrorist thing who are not controlled by Hamas. Talking about reporting from other countries, not much is said in our MSM about how Hamas controls the media and restricts their output.

If Hamas really cared about the people it would build bomb shelters for them instead of terror tunnels. If Hamas really cared about the people it would honour truces and quit showing their desire to exterminate those Jews, then they wouldn't need bomb shelters. Greenhouses destroyed and Hamas getting wealthy http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-z-chesnoff/gaza-and-palestinian-leadership_b_5589766.html

What 'occupation of Gaza', Israel left Gaza in 2005 leaving thousands of greenhouses which were destroyed by Palestinians. Israel’s ambassador Ron Prosor is calling on the UN to condemn Hamas for kidnapping an Israeli soldier, breaking a temp. truce and denying humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza, demand the demilitarization of the Gaza Strip and declare Hamas a terrorist organization. http://www.timesofisrael.com/day-25-us-slams-indefensible-israeli-strike-pa-could-press-war-crimes-charges/ Kerry condemns Hamas http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/269531441.html And rightly so...

To the question in the first post: No, there is no reason for him to resign.