Black Dog

Remind me who was talking about locking up his political opponents in the last two elections and continues to promise to use the military and police to prosecute or punish his political enemies? It's Trump, so spare me the crocodile tears and performative hand-wringing.

This idea only makes sense if you're just talking about white men. Black and Hispanic men voted overwhelmingly for Biden.

Chill bro, it's a joke. LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Well the good news is you can still get a pic in your McDo's uniform when you head to work tonight.

Is there any video of this from an English language source?

I'd ask to back this up but we know how that would go (nowhere, because you're lying). Yeah see I was right: you have to ignore the motivations and intentions of most of these policies because if you consider the whys and what-fors, your whole argument crumbles into dust in the face of the simple cold logic that the purpose of the Nazis entire political project was the advancement of the Aryan Volk and subjugation of other races. You've created some fantasy world where laws prohibiting Jews and other groups from participating in the economic and social life of the country, where policies to promote Aryan families and racial purity (such as eugenics programs), and a plan to carry out the large-scale ethnic cleansing/genocide of Slavs, Eastern European Jews, and other indigenous peoples of Eastern Europe were all somehow race-neutral. It's laughable, you're a joke.

Aw look you're again reduced to repetition instead of logic and facts. Sad but predictable.

It's not a meme, it's an accurate representation of your posting style. Just repeating the same shit over and over and over like a NPC from a shitty RPG. It's where you always end up because you're a loser who can't resist losing. In fairness I will give you the fact you posted a source for your claim that Jews are not a race, a completely irrelevant point that no one was even disputing.

You're trying so hard to pretend you're not mad and actually laughing that it's obvious the opposite is happening. Try not to be so predictable. it's so funny how triggered you are by any ribald or off-colour jokes you virgin nerd. Yes there are people who think racist jokes are funny and delight in making people mad by making racist jokes, that doesn't mean the jokes aren't racist. It means the jokesters are huge pieces of shit. Again, you're ignoring the particulars of the incident because you're a dishonest little shitbag who knows that dealing with what actually happened blows your argument out of the water. No I'm betting most normal people who aren't already inclined to find humour in racist provocations would agree the people putting this crap up are giant losers. If you're the kind of shithead who looks at an incident like this and thinks the reaction is about "hating white males" versus finding racist provocations distasteful, it's probably better that you stay away from university and throw yourself in front of a train instead.

What sources and info? The wiki page I posted that proves you wrong? You haven't posted anything else, as per usual. Not a link lol every time I understand this is an important a survival mechanism because if you had to confront the reality of what a massive loser b!tch you are, you'd probably kill yourself.

Do normal Americans want to crash the economy and create a fascist police state where undesirables are rounded up by a engorged state security apparatus as Trump is promising to do?

Enjoy your next heart attack fatty.

I love you dispshits pretending a coinflip is a sure thing lol.

Interesting confession, can't say I'm surprised.

Yeah no, you are seething and coping with the emojis to prove it, it's your tell. Don't crack a rib trying to suck your own dick buddy. The problem with your dogshit argument is that the "joke" hinges on the phrase being harmless and innocuous. However, once it's deployed in a malicious manner in a way that is actually intended to cause offense (as in the particular case) it nullifies the joke and just becomes an act of racial incitement. Because context is important, something you are incapable of grasping (hence why you keep ignoring where these posters were placed in this case). Of course you haven't given any examples of this hatred, only one example of hatred of racism. Are you implying white males are inherently racist?

Your source is irrelevant, I have no idea why you're harping on this. "The Nazi usages of the term Lebensraum were explicitly racial." This isn't entirely true. Hitler was convinced that England would back down over Poland just as they had over Czechoslovakia. He was surprised off when they declared war because he assumed the western powers were Germany's natural allies against Judeo-Bolshevism. I've countered each of these points already, repeating them won't make them true. It all comes back to race with the Nazis, lying about it repeatedly won't change that. You're projecting again. You're clearly incapable of addressing the "why" the Nazis did the things they did while pretending in spite of all evidence that their racial beliefs were somehow separate from or tangential to their political program, even though everything you listed above flows from those beliefs. Like the fact you can sit here and talk about their economic, social welfare and family policies while ignoring the purpose of those policies, who benefitted and who did not shows you aren't a serious person. You haven't proven jack shit. Again, your own source makes it clear the Nazi's version of lebensraum was inextricably tied to Hitler's belief in the superiority of the German Volk and its natural right to conquer whatever it chose. I have no idea why you're so interested in whitewashing the centrality of the Nazi's racial views to their political and military actions, but it's really a step away from outright denialism. This is just comical at this point, you'll be telling me the Holocaust didn't happen next.

What nonsense conspiracy is this now?

Can you imagine if George Soros was cutting cheques for people to vote Harris? All the right wingers here would be moaning and demanding he get put in a concentration camp.

Every swing state is a statistical dead heat. So? There are still more urban voters than rural. Isn't the lesson here that polls are unreliable?

It's faith and deeds unless you're a filthy Prod.

It's a statistical dead heat, what are you talking about?

It's only open to swing state voters and you have to register to vote to be eligible, what the f*ck do you think this is about dumb. dumb.

Boy did I call the tsunami of cope emojis or what. What an utterly predictable dullard you are. You were quoting a link I already posted. How can you claim you posted that link when i already posted it almost a week ago? I can't believe how retarded you are. Like I'm literally in awe that you can work a computer. The phrase started as a joke online. It was then embraced by white supremacists who went around putting posters up as an act of racial incitement. People got upset, not because they can't take a joke but because it was an act of racial incitement. I notice you keep ignoring the part about where and when the posters were put up in this specific incident because you know that added context destroys your whole argument, but you're such a bad faith piece of shit troll you can't help yourself. You made broad and unsupported claims about this stuff, but no actual examples. Maybe the reason attitudes about whites have gotten so bad is so many of them think it's ok to pull racist stunts.

Nope. Already debunked.

If you think there was nothing racial about the Nazis hatred of what they called Judeo-Bolshevism, you really need to read an actual book. It was the underpinning of their ideology and everything they did was in service of that ideology. It wasn't a Imperial policy, it was a theory of geography that evolved seamlessly into a racial crusade: Kjellén's geopolitical interpretation of the Lebensraum concept was adopted, expanded, and adapted to the politics of Germany by publicists of imperialism such as the militarist General Friedrich von Bernhardi (1849–1930) and the political geographer and proponent of geopolitics Karl Haushofer (1869–1946). In Deutschland und der Nächste Krieg (1911; Germany and the Next War), General von Bernhardi developed Friedrich Ratzel's Lebensraum concept as a racial struggle for living space, explicitly identified Eastern Europe as the source of a new, national habitat for the German people, and said that the next war would be expressly for acquiring Lebensraum—all in fulfillment of the "biological necessity" to protect German racial supremacy. Vanquishing the Slavic and the Latin races was deemed necessary because "without war, inferior or decaying races would easily choke the growth of healthy, budding elements" of the German race—thus, the war for Lebensraum was a necessary means of defending Germany against cultural stagnation and the racial degeneracy of miscegenation. The expansionary part and the race part are immeshed and inseparable. The racial aspect was the entire motivation for the Nazis, not an afterthought or a nice-to-have for them. The Nazis considered the Jews a race, that's all that's relevant for our purposes here. They wanted to control the economy to eliminate what thy saw as the pernicious influence of Jews. They wanted to rearm and expand to exterminate lesser races and absorb the territory into greater Germany. Their improvements to health and education and their family policies were all about increasing the size of the population and to ensuring it was pure Aryan (everyone else got eugenics). It all comes back to the central belief in the superiority of the German Volk and the annihilation of its inferior enemies. Again: you cannot separate individual policies from the worldview they served. I literally addressed this already: every policy they had was in service of their racial beliefs even if the policies themselves were not explicitly race-based but as such they are still racist. Expansion to protect the German race, silly. LMAO, "the best interests of society?" Whose society, exactly? Really? Even Jewish families? Roma? Slavic? Did everyone get to enjoy teh great care and services equally? It wasn't icing on the cake, it was baked right into it. Because England declared war on them first. This just proves my point: they had no racial animosity towards France or England or the U.S.A and wouldn't have fought any of them but for treaty obligations on both sides. They wanted to go east because that's where the people they wanted to eliminate were. Not deep down, no. The racial motivation is pretty easy to discern, given it was their whole deal. My argument is it's absurd to pretend that the Nazi's policies were separate or free from the taint of their worldview. In the Jim Crow South, they had laws that were prima facie race-neutral, but were intended to criminalize and disenfranchise Black people and were enforced accordingly. Those policies were racist even if the letter of the law made no mention of race. The same holds for the Nazis. The purposes of the policies were to enforce the Nazis' racial hierarchy and create their ideal society where the Aryan Volk was on top. Pretending that those policies are somehow separate from the motivations of their creators and their real-world effects is absurd and naive. I don't care what your woke link says, Hitler considered the Jews a race (rasse) that's all that matters for the purposes of this discussion.