Black Dog

I love how you're so retarded you think gutting the entire U.S. economy by deporting millions of workers will make inflation go down. You really belong in a care home with no Internet access.

Those don't sound like irrational reactions to dealing with you to be honest. You had shit thrown at you be more than one person? LOL, oh yeah, this is a you problem.

I don't think he has any coherent beliefs at all. He's a reflexive, unthinking contrarian. If that means he has to deny the Holocaust to try and "win" an argument, well he'll do it.

Oh look who can't back up his claims with ebvidence again, lol you a fake b!tch. Then you should be able to list one but everything you have listed ties directly to the Nazi's racial vision. The policy was the Nazi's policy before the Nazis? LOL. 1. Again, lebensraum wasn't policy before the Nazis, it was an idea. 2. The idea itself was rooted in racism, as I've shown about 500 times now. 3. The Nazi's execution of their policy was explicitly and fundamentally racial. Except we live in the reality where they wanted to take over what they considered their rightful territory because of their racial superiority. We know because they said so. Again with repeating the same tired an already debunked nonsense with cope emojis. Get a new schtick dude. It's very funny watching you lie to yourself. Sorry, I meant pathetic.

oop Billionaire Bill Ackman Admits Debate Conspiracy He Pushed Is Fake Billionaire Bill Ackman spent days after the ABC presidential debate promoting false claims that a network “whistleblower” had allegedly uncovered collusion between ABC and Kamala Harris’ campaign. Now, a month and multiple denials later, he sees the claims differently. “It seems pretty clear that the alleged @abc whistleblower debate story claiming that @KamalaHarris was given questions in advance and other advantages was a fake,” Ackman posted on X alongside a blog post by Megyn Kelly discussing the dubious claims.

Cite? lol read a book ya goofball. looool oh my god this is so funny.

I didn't say anything about "original intent." I said "intention and purpose are inextricable from the law itself" and the fact that the same law can be used for different ends for different purposes proves that. The purpose is what gives the law meaning. It wasn't an existing policy, stupid. It was a theory, a concept, an idea. So why do you keep doing it? The Nazis considered the Jews a race, you dumbshit, get it through your skull. I've never disputed that it was about colonization, that was always self-evident. But they did want the land because they thought it would be a nice place to build a second home. It was an ideologically and racially motivated plan of conquest. The "Master Race" doctrine of Nazi ideology condemned Slavs to permanent domination by Germanic peoples, since it viewed them as primitive people who lacked the ability to undertake autonomous activities. Generalplan Ost evolved from these racist, imperialist ideas and was formulated by the Nazi regime as its official policy during the course of the Second World War. Imagine thinking there's a meaningful difference between ethnic cleansing and racial cleansing as practiced by the Nazis, lol what a goof. Nazis: "We are a master race, which must remember that the lowliest German worker is racially and biologically a thousand times more valuable than the population here." CdnFox: "Uh well akshually Germans are an ethnicity not a race." Nazis: "Very interesting, now get in the ditch." Cope and seethe.

Trump supporters squawking about outlier polls when citing Rasmussen Reports lol. Strip out the outlier and she's still up by an average of 5.7 in the last month,

He maintained good relationships with Russia like a prison punk maintains a good relationship with his top. Ok pop let's get you your pills before you keel over.

She's up by 8 lmao.

He tried to start a war with Iran and kissed up to Russia, NoKo and the Taliban because they flattered is fragile ego. The dude is softer than babyshit. Yeah we know stroke victims like you prefer the guy they can relate to most.

A federal system that prioritizes on regional differences is inherently flawed. Regions don't vote, people do. Nope. If you go purely by vote share in 2021, the Cons would have got fewer seats than they did under FPTP (they received 33.7% of the vote and got 35% of the seats). the models I've seen for a PR system would also only give them 125 seats instead of 119, still well shy of the 170 seats needed for a majority government. No idea how you get a government out of that. They whined but they didn't want to change the system because it normally benefits conservative parties who would otherwise almost never get a sniff at forming the government. I define unfair by meaning it isn't fair that some votes count more than others, while you think it's fair because it delivers results you prefer.

This is especially amusing coming from a Trump bag-licker. That guy has the emotional regulation abilities of a really dumb toddler.

if Trump doesn't want to be compared to Hitler he should stop telling people how much he likes Hitler and wants to be like him.

Another thing: Stalin didn't go around saying "we should lock this guy up" he actually locked up his political opponents and worse.

lol no You don't. as I've shown in this thread and others. It's incredibly rare if not completely unheard of for you to start and argument and refer to any supporting evidence or facts. I'll refer you again to your initial post in this particular "discussion" where you made multiple claims with absolutely no evidence and, when pressed for such supporting evidence, you refused and whined. All you do is state your shitty opinions, cry when you're asked for proof or evidence, restate said shitty opinions again and then devolve into a pathetic mixture of self-puffery and personal attacks. Except this isn't a logical conclusion. You don't actually know the intentions of the people who put up the posters at ETSU, but one can logically infer from the fact they targeted black students that they did so as an act of racial provocation. As for citing wikipedia here, that's extra stupid since that article make sit clear that the "joke" was embraced by white supremacists and, this may come as a sock to you but racist trolling is racist trolling, not innocent hijinks to prove a point. Turn on your monitor dumbshit, you're talking to your reflection. Actually this is true, it's only retarded conservatives like you who have a problem with me, but your opinions or lives don't matter at all. Again, this is pure projection. No you provided an example, singular, of an incident of racist trolling not intolerance of white males. You failed. As usual.

The Nazis considered the Jews a race, that's all that's relevant. But again, I have no idea why you're fixated on this point. Lmao, you have no idea how this actually undermines your point, do you? If a law can be reinterpreted by someone with a different intention for a different purpose than its creators', that just proves intention and purpose are inextricable from the law itself. The law is merely an instrument for carrying out a given agenda. That's actually the first decent example you've come up with of a policy that could be seen as ideologically neutral. The problem is, we're not talking about Harper cutting taxes, we're talking about the goddamned Nazis. They literally had race laws. These are not the same thing, you know that right? I've already demonstrated how objectively race-neutral laws or policies could be used for racist purposes. This is false. It was an idea that originated in human geography that the Nazis turned into an explicit (and explicitly racist) policy. They're the only ones who took the idea of and actually put into action and they did so, again quite explicitly, for racist reasons. I knew you'd get into Holocaust denial sooner or later loooool. Also no, it was not a "tiny part" since the entire idea of colonizing the east depended on eliminating the people already there. Again: Hitler's doctrine of Lebensraum envisaged the mass-killings, enslavement and ethnic cleansing of Slavic inhabitants of Eastern Europe, followed by the colonization of these lands with Germanic settlers. They systematically murdered 17 million people as part of the Holocaust, including 11 million non-Jewish victims, mostly Poles and Russians. That's more than the entire death toll on both sides, including civilians, on the western front. the idea that that was just a sidebar or something is beyond farcical and again crosses into Holocaust denialism.

This is entirely a product of the fact we have more than two parties and operate on a Westminster model. The conservatives wouldn't have formed the government even with a more proportional voting system. And yes, conservatives have whined about this endlessly. Our way is shitty and unfair, but it's shitty and unfair in a different way than the American's joke of a system.

If the human centipede here is any indication then the answer is yes:

What does Stalin have to do with your abject hypocrisy? What the f*ck are you blathering about. You support Trump so you support exactly that.

The fact you think you deal in facts and logic is an even bigger delusion than you thinking you're clever. If you dealt in facts, you'd present them instead of just repeating opinions over and over. If you dealt in logic you'd be able to look at the example from Tennessee and see a clear racist motivation, but you can't follow the train of logic to the station. Your oft-demonstrated lack of self-awareness is also quite pathetic.

Aw you're still trying to get my attention! Here's your cookie, sweetie.

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Nope. I said the Nazis considered the Jews a race. If you have any evidence of me saying something else, let's see it. Put up for once. Not that it matters since whether they are or aren't is entirely irrelevant here. LMAO, that's retarded. Laws and policies don't exist in a vacuum, they are instruments of a vision or political agenda. Conceding that the Nazis were racist but denying that informed any of their policies is utterly insane. Also calling the Nazis "racist" is actually underselling the centrality of race to the entire Nazi Weltanschauung. Lon no, this is completely inaccurate. It's not like they were like "hey we should expand our borders for more living space" and later realized they could also do genocide as a treat. The ENTIRE point was to reclaim territory they considered to be historically theirs from lesser races. The race thing was central to the whole concept as I've shown you time and again. At this point I have no idea why you're even arguing this when the Nazis weren't exactly shy about their motivations: The plan, prepared in the years 1939–1942, was part of Adolf Hitler's and the Nazi movement's Lebensraum policy and a fulfilment of the Drang nach Osten (English: Drive towards the East) ideology of German expansion to the east, both of them part of the larger plan to establish the New Order. More than economic calculations, ideological fanaticism and racism played a central role in Nazi regime's implementation of extermination programs such as the GPO. Hitler's doctrine of Lebensraum envisaged the mass-killings, enslavement and ethnic cleansing of Slavic inhabitants of Eastern Europe, followed by the colonization of these lands with Germanic settlers. Well obviously because considering the motivations and ideology destroys your argument so you have to pretend the motivations and polices are separate, which is nonsense. Huh I wonder why they wanted to do all these things i guess we'll never know. No I dispute all that and maintain it is impossible to separate the letter of the law from the intent of its creators and its real world effects. You should spend less time being an insufferable twat and more time actually making good arguments.