Black Dog

I love Mad Libs.

In that the great majority of its adherents are peaceful.

How about evidence that Canada's contribution is actually meaningful?

Seems that you're talking about bureaucratic nomenclature which may or may not have anything to do with an individual's actual circumstances.

LOL, ok tough guy, why don't you hop a plane and go join the pesh merga? Do your part instead of being a chickenhawk waiting for others to fight the battle for you?

Why? That's exactly what Daesh wants. Cite?

I think you're overstating the extent to which those distinctions are made.

Leaving aside the fact that the Klan was at one time a very active and very dangerous terrorist organization that murdered and terrorized black Americans with impunity for decades, the point stands.

Yeah because whether or not one is actually a refugee depends on having one's papers in order.

You claimed it was reported in news outlets, so a simple link would suffice. This isn't hard. The more you duck and dodge this, the more it looks like you are full of crap.

You must be getting senile in your dotage. You clearly implied some "dumb policy" on the part of France was to blame for the attacks in Paris. I simply request clarification as to what policy you had in mind. But I suppose it's my own fault for expecting that you put some actual thought into the statement you made instead of recognizing it for what it was: a terribly lazy and illogical attempt to connect two unconnected things in support of a pre-existing and unshakeable worldview. Your typically ignorant and dismissive response shows you gave this as much thought as I gave my morning crap, with similar results.

I think you need to revisit the statement to which I was responding, specifically the bolded portion. Or do you need me to explain the logic of your own words to you?

What dumb policy, specifically, lead to this? Was it France's military campaign against ISIL or their failure to properly integrate their immigrant populations?

Except for the whole thing.

You didn't really think this through, did you? Because this raises the question of why these groups have lower socioeconomic status.

And again, you're tilting at strawmen here, taking a concept that describes groups and making it about individuals. Typical Orwellian SJW stuff from you lol. So blacks in the States and First Nations communities are completely free from the legacy of slavery, Jim Crow, residential schools etc? You should tell them that.

Cite required.

Or it suggests there are different power dynamics at work that need to be considered. "White privilege" in the academic sense is only insulting if you don't understand the concept and you assume it's about you, personally.

We don't need to project anything. You're intentions are clear. You're basically a Bizzaro-SJW in every way. I feel bad for kimmy who has been nothing but thoughtful and clear in this thread, only to get this kind of garbage response that has f*** all to do with microaggressions.

That's a broad brush with which to paint 12,300 students.

That may be true for you. I doubt such a thing is the case across society. No it's a social thing. If that were true you'd think men would make unsolicited remarks at physically weaker men too. But they don't. Yeah, I bet most women would happily give up the occasional free drink in exchange for not being harassed or stalked.

If you have a job or an opinion, people will assume you're competent/know what you're talking about until proven otherwise. Oh and you can walk down the street without getting catcalled.

Only a moron would lay this on a Canadian PM who has been in office for two days. And look! One did!