Jump to content

French Patriot

Member
  • Posts

    1,259
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by French Patriot

  1. Jesus death was not at issue. His way of thinking and guidance was. Thanks for showing us your mind. Fail. Regards DL
  2. I do not think most of us are evil enough to use genocide or infanticide and kill the way Yahweh is shown to have done, but ok. Regards DL
  3. He would likely die. The way Socrates put it was in a question. Who would make his shoes? Have you noticed how modern people who say they are going it alone these days in the wild are there with their rifles, bullets and all weather gear, all made by others. I agree that we all contribute good or evil in various degrees. That does not change the logic and reason of universalism. Regards DL
  4. Yes. Look up the lake of fire where hell and it's souls are supposed to be dumped into at the end of days. I would say that such would be hell but we seem to be on the same page regardless of the language. Regards DL
  5. LOL. You killed the messenger without showing your intelligent interpretation of those scriptures or showing where Watts whent wrong. You win that argument. Oh wait ---- Regards DL
  6. The bible was not just written for the magistrates. These quotes say he was talking to all people. Here is the real way to salvation that Jesus taught. Matthew 6:22 The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light. John 14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him. Romans 8:29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. Allan Watts explain those quotes in detail. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alRNbesfXXw&feature=player_embedded Regards DL
  7. You are correct, but do you think Yahweh to be a moral enough entity to judge righteously? Gnostic Christianity has tied righteousness to equality and that is why we are a universalist religion with a heaven but no hell. We all contribute to what we all are and do and thus should all have the same hell or heaven, punishment or reward after death. I E. Hitler was not born to be what he ended up being. All who reared him or facilitated his rise are just as guilty, collectively, as Hitler was. Regards DL
  8. Jesus said he came to serve those who needed saving, not for those who did not when his disciple chastise him for hanging out with drinkers and prostitutes etc. I agree that he also would have taught to leave the killing to god. It would have been nice if his church had that ideology as then they would not have murdered so many with their inquisitions. I agree that the hell thing adds purposeless torture before the second and final death of the souls. That is why I think Yahweh to be quite the vile prick whom no one should idol worship. Regards DL
  9. Indeed. One delusion leads to another. We are all god in the sense that we should all be trying to live whatever ideal we think humans should be. Anything else is wish list and fantasy. Jesus asked, have ye forgotten that ye are gods? Most people have. Regards DL
  10. Proof of god is a moral question. Do you see the morals shown for god as good or evil? Religions tout themselves as being the final word in moral issues, even though secular law has rejected as too barbaric most of those laws. Not that they were original to Christianity as many of the older traditions had variants of the same laws. To me, a moral god would cure and never kill. That is the position Jesus took towards the non-believers. Jesus said to love all people including your enemies and if Jesus is Yahweh then he too must love all and save all just as Jesus would. Jesus would say that God killing instead of curing is evil. Jesus would say that God curing instead of killing is good. If god cures instead of killing then there is no hell as a good god or Jesus would have no use for purposeless torture and death. Thoughts? Regards DL
  11. What good is a good god, when people want an evil god? The Gnostic Cathars thought themselves to be a peaceful good man religion and basically the only good non-violent Christians. History is showing that that was true. That is due to the fact that they did not war against other religions the way the other Christians of those days did. As Christians and other religionists will attest, and usually don’t, that all the religions in those days were war like and war loving. They gorged on blood and shit. Most except for esoteric ecumenist Gnostics, who warred with their mouths, instead of inquisitions, jihads and holy wars. Gnostics knew how to live in peace, but as history has shown us, the good die young and the evil grows threw murder and corruption. Hurray for the mainstream religions. Gnostic against Gnostic is nice because, as esoteric ecumenists, we respect each other as doing what Jesus taught and that was to seek god perpetually, but never find him. Jesus was from an old school single eye shaman or guru training in Egypt, knowledge seekers and not god worshipers; and told us to look to our emotions as well as our minds for the best rules and laws to live by. We know what those best laws are but do not implement them; because they lead to piece and people want the drama of war. You are not following a good god, you are following man’s law and Trump shows how badly all of man’s laws are working. We have all put the god of money above all the gods except for the most evil gods that man has created. The Yahweh and Allah twins. We have no choice in this thanks to our oligarch masters. The Yahweh and Allah twins cannot possibly exist. He would certainly punish such a flagrant insult. Instead, the twins hide. Being made in our image, god is quite insecure. That is what being good does, as the good know that when people want a powerful god, that basically means that they are evil as well, as they are to emulate god. A genocidal god who kills when he can cure. We follow secular law and not god’s barbaric laws. We look for security in dollars and war and not god’s power. Secular law is teaching us better morals and ethics than religions. God should capitulate because he has lost the war. We have all put another god above all the gods. Religions die hard. Laïcité is cushioning the blows as gently as it can but too many religionists will still die. Unless the world goes esoteric ecumenist like Jesus was. It is too bad that we all want gods of war instead of a god of peace. Do you have any idea as to how to mitigate that bias? It might be written in our selfish gene and wanting an evil god might be good. Regards DL
  12. Is belief in the supernatural an intelligent person’s game? Nothing that I know of, other than personal renderings or hear say, has ever been produced or provide to show the existence of a supernatural realm or entities. The ancients did not seem to think the supernatural was a reality. https://bigthink.com/videos/what-is-god-2-2 No entity, good or evil, have ever manifested itself in a provable way, even though some think god is Omni-present and that Satan was given the ability and power to deceive us all. I think that those who believe in supernatural entities are being taken advantage of by fraudulent preachers who recognize our propensity of over imagination, which we all have, as shown in the Princess Alice experiments. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWx_uVDh4Cw I can see some benefits in imaginary thinking to validate or refute ideas but that is about it. Is belief or faith in the supernatural a worthy idea for us or is it a tool used by lying preachers intent on fleecing sheeple? If there is no supernatural god, should we not seek a human leader or spiritual guide instead of idolizing imaginary supernatural gods that are demonstrably less moral than humans? Regards DL
  13. I have a memory. You are the one with nothing. Regards DL
  14. No argument on this. Regards DL
  15. Watch The Demise of Guys and listen to the other links to experts in the field that pop up, and that should answer your question. It is all tied to child rearing and how is a male child going to learn to be a man when he is fatherless and even if not, if average, he will only have his fathers attention for 20 minutes a week, if I recall correctly. Garbage fathers produce garbage children. Regards DL
  16. First. Thanks for sharing your anecdotal story. I agree with all but the non-judgemental way. If we do not collectively judge an abdication of ones responsibilities then those do abdicate their duty will not get it. That would reduce the presently shrinking numbers of those faster, but with a 9 billion person world, ---- with rape, incest and really stupid and out of control men, whom the majority is letting down, there will always be a need for abortions. Regards DL
  17. Google the demise of guys or find the stat yourself. If you can find a better stat than that professor/researcher, I will happily look at it. Regards DL
  18. How we value lives highly as shown in the improving stats of that link. I guess that you are just to stupid to know how to read stats. Regards DL
  19. Because Canadians are not stupid and know that the government has no business in the bedrooms of the nation. Have you not noticed the stats dropping on their own thanks to education and contraception? Men are the problem and if you have heard or read of the material titled, The Demise of Guys, you will see just how badly we are letting our young generation of boys and men down. If you are serious about cleaning up our mess on the issues under discussion, your efforts, I think, might be better spent on the problem that research points to. It is an eye opener. Regards DL
  20. Why so many single moms? Because men will not step up to do what women do, which is take responsibility for their actions. As to your main theme of coercion. There is none with consenting adults. The state has no business in the bedrooms of the nation and all you are proposing is a low level stoning for fornicators, while ignoring that they are lovers or at least well acquainted in most cases. Shall we go back to when men were stoned to death for sex between consenting adults? Why not just do as the Muslims do and beat the fuck out of women for just being desirable and irresistible to weak minded men? Regards DL
  21. If they did want to protect that right, and their children, it is not shown when 50% of all households are manned by single women. I think women can do a better job of protection reproduction than deadbeat dads, given the vile male history. Regards DL
  22. I was not sure given the tone of your post and some of the weird comments and misuse of the term "murder". Regards DL
  23. The tax payers are not interested in supporting unwanted children who will just add to the social costs because of their unhappiness levesl, povertu and criminal tendencies. Have you not noticed how that group is over represented in our jails? Do you want more neighbours of that ilk? Are you willing to pay a lot more in taxes to bring them to our normal standards? I am not as the results are dismal. BTW. The embryo or zygote is a potential human from the moment the egg reacts to fertilization. Not at some other arbitrary time. How many women are you ready to see die from botched abortion procedures in some dirty back room? What Number of babies saves equals what number of dead women? Regards DL
  24. Good luck selling that. Even the ancients, who were a lot brighter than we think, who tried to sanctify sex, failed. If people will not abstain for their gods, they will not for themselves. I think that either the new generations of the males you put stats up on above are either really wimpy these days or my generation was a lot tougher. Even not the best sex was good sex. Regards DL
  25. They hardly investigate many assault and rape charges and treat our victims to more victimization. Canada is good, but we have a ways to go. As any victim of a pedophile priest. Regards DL
×
×
  • Create New...