Now we're getting somewhere. So they didn't say they didn't believe it. You just made that up. They said the timing is suspicious. I would agree. I don't think the timing is a coincidence.

Now, after misrepresenting what they survey said, why did you fail to report where the survey came from? Not exactly a reputable polling firm, and you wanted to hide that? Maybe a twitter survey or something? lol

You really are a sad case...  

Yes, but also undeniably correct.

You can't attack her for being an irresponsible drug addict and ignore that he fought to keep an irresponsible drug addict in power when he should have resigned.

And Doug seems to think having power trumps everything. He didn't seem too worried about Rob's children when he was happy to let his drug issues slide to keep the mayorship.

How is his track record for responsible government not a salient point?

@Angus. Wynne has already used it as a political attack which is disturbing.   While Ford was not my choice he's what we have and certainly no reason to vote for higher taxes and or more corruption. Ad to these increases carbon taxes so would be a disaster for Ontario 

Bad news for the other 6 if he does.

On second thought....he just might come.  What better opportunity than to have all 6 in one room? 

Btw..........looks like it's 2 vs 5.  IF Conte's a populist.

Nevertheless, the CBC poll tracker currently gives Ford more than a 72% chance of winning a majority. I agree with betsy. The only poll that counts is on election day and the NDP have the momentum!

That momentum is starting to fade pretty quickly as more of their loony members are revealed to public scrutiny. Not to mention really bad math skills, sanctuary provinces and donating an unspecified "little more" in taxes. 

....and Horvath's statement that she'll never use the back-to-work legislation:  what does that say to the union?

Just by revealing that openly, is a bad decision, Ms Horvath!  You're practically announcing you'll give the  greenlight for the union to take the taxpayers to the cleaners!

Shocked and appalled! Is it as bad as stalking and intimidating Pina Martino? I'm wondering what Miss Manners would say.

So you don't believe there should be any rules governing a public debate? You'd prefer a free for all where everyone just shouts down everyone else? You think moderators should simply be ornamental in function? I ask because your simple and blatantly obvious attempt at deflection would tend to indicate that you don't think serious civilized debate is very important at all.

Yes, Scrib.  And when the moderator tried to stop her - it's noticeably a half-hearted attempt to do so.   

I know they're there to determine that - but that's just it!  Kim could be using that as the excuse to get them there.  The UN delegation should've been the ones to have gone there.

It would have been the administration's call whether they would even be allowed to go. Ridiculous that they would send them there and then leave them potentially stranded because the president is a dotard who talks before he thinks.

Who sent them??   What administration should??  What are you on about?

You do know that it's a mixed small group?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/05/24/for-foreign-journalists-a-lengthy-and-bizarre-journey-to-see-a-north-korean-nuclear-test-site-demolition/?utm_term=.5fcf4f200c78

The biggest conspiracy theory of all time:  Trump-russia collusion 'theory'  

Why do people keep pleading guilty to something so fake, eh? That must just blow your mind. Boom.

Having a president start a sentence (in a teeet) with "I hereby demand..." doesn't trigger any alarm bells? Can we blame it on the media's portrayal of him as a fat, stupid, wannabe dictator?

If JT was so easy to outsmart, how come boy genius Kenney didn't stay in federal politics and show us how it's done? 

There's no question that having a Russian mob asset for a president is unprecedented and that it could well lead to a constitutional crisis, but it doesn't mean it can't happen. There are lots of ways to bring him down, and it will be fun watching Mueller do it. Bwahahaha.

Changing the subject, are we?

......and coming full circle:

In denial.....in denial........in denial..........bwehehehehe. 

Not at all. I'm just enjoying watching the deplorables defend their wannabe dictator's attempts to circumvent the law, and I will particularly enjoy watching them fail.  Bwahahaha.

I don't actually consider myself a "supporter", since he is not my president and I do not follow all the stories about Donald Trump very closely. Certainly, not as closely as you.

However, a quick google check shows that the person who was subpoenaed today was the long-time social media consultant for one of Trump's advisors.

Link

Not quite as you have stated, 
 

Quote

why the grand jury subpoena of Trump's social media strategist today?

Perhaps a little ketchup with your nothingburger today? 

Before you completely deny ever supporting Trump, explain how that's different.

What's really funny (and even ridiculous!)  is that Deripaska, Rusal, EN+ (these are the companies that he headed or founded) fell under sanctions, but the sanctions are so formal that Deripaska himself admits that they did not hurt his business too much.

The message:  "Hey Warmbier's, don't rock the boat".

That message could've come from anyone in Trump's inner circle.  It was something that Trump personally reached out to them.  And, what had happened to Otto shouldn't be cast aside.  It must be so painful for the Warmbiers to watch the unfolding event.....

Indigenous people get screwed. Justin tells them "indigenous agenda needs time" so he drags his feet. On the other hand he won't heed the Senate's opinion that he's moving too fast on marijuana. The Senate wants Indigenous concerns addressed. Trudeau wants pot legislation by the summer. What's up with this?

Well....still, majority of Democrats give the credit to Trump for the current state of the economy!  Whether they think the economy is  doing well or not - majority give the credit to Trump!

When speaking honestly, we call that "blame."

"Honestly?" 

Most economists - says the source - agree that the economy is booming. 

He was not!  Otherwise he would've done something to make the cop shoot!   You're the one who's confused with reality - the guy gave himself up! 

The fact remains that some of the time a firearm does de-escalate a situation that might go catastrophically bad. That reality has nothing to do with your Trump derangement syndrome. I have no idea what this topic has to do with Trump. I'm starting to think you can't utter a sentence without mentioning Trump. Want me to say Trump again, just to make you feel good. Trump, Trump, Trump. Feel better now?

He was doing something to make the cop shoot. He was pretending he had a gun and was going to shoot him. He also called for him to shoot numerous times. It was a classic case of suicide by cop that would have, in most cases, worked. This cop just happened to show restraint, which usually doesn't happen in these situations.

hmmm...Angus seems to be going over the edge now that his Trump is going down.