Wait until he picks a SC Justice - we ain't seen nothing yet.

I say, if you can do it, do it!   As quick as you can!

Don't bother listening to the whiny sore losers!   

The mueller investigation could take years, 

I wouldn't want to be a nominee because this will be the most  vicious, dirty and  character assassination campaign yet. 

Why don't you like Meryl Streep?

Are you really comfortable being a part of Sanders' mob and attacking a private citizen?

That's not really how it happened, however I'm pretty comfortable with the idea that anyone who gets into the political ring, may take a few punches.  

I don't think that's what happened to Sanders. I think her face is like that from some sort of palsy.

Yes, how much did it cost taxpayers just for him to go to Mar-a-Lago every weekend?

Who knows, who cares, being Canadian as opposed to American and all? What we do know is that our illustrious leader (so called) raided the CPP to the tune of $4.7 billion to buy an old pipeline that we didn't have to buy if he'd done his job instead of trying to play both sides of the issue. What we do know is that he now plans to raid CPP for billions more for his green agenda. I guess someone (Butts) pointed out to him that CPP represents a huge piggy bank to play with at our expense. Makes swing sets and golf carts look like small potatoes in contrast doesn't it.

Millenials might end up with no CPP. 

Heck, even we could lose our CPP.

Are you really accusing the MSM of not doing their part in stoking division and getting people angry at other private citizens?

I suppose you can view it that way, if you're a gold medalist in mental gymnastics. Non gold medalist's would see it as selective reporting in order to further a narrative tied to a particular agenda. You just keep vaulting away though.

If Antifa and the Democrats are the same thing, how about saying Stormfront and the Republicans are the same thing? Or would saying that be shamelessly lying to make a weak point seem more believable?

That is just the beginning

My "leftwing sources" are mainstream sources that use verifiable facts. You don't even trust your sources enough to cite them. It's funny how, on the one hand, you argue in favour of this policy and yet you aren't brave enough to own it. Instead you have to make up BS about Obama to justify it, as though, if Obama did it, caging innocent children would be okay. 

It's funny how you come on here just to troll and insult, as the rules say:  insults are the ammunition of the unintelligent

Is it insulting to call BS BS? Is that trolling now? If it isn't BS, back it up. If you can't back it up, admit it's BS. Pretty simple really.

Too bad nobody cared about the kids when Obama did it.

 America has millions of children  living in poverty  homeless children! What about them? 

Why are illegals who put their children in this position more important than those kids?   

10,000 currently in custody where sent alone by their parents.  

That's a lot of deflection in one post. 

Obama had a zero tolerance policy that sought to discourage immigration by putting kids more than 20 to a cage? Nope. Someone lied to you again and you believed them again.

The rest is a pretty weak argument. I bet years from now, when this is all over and Trump is dead, you will deny ever arguing in favour of caging children.

I'm not in favour of 'caging children' but keep on denying that it didn't happen under Obama.

I am however in favour of sending a message to those who cross illegally and also send their kids unaccompanied.

 The U.S. is taking in around 250 kids per day at that rate there will tens of thousands of them to process and look after. Up to now around 12,000 of these kids are unaccompanied minors – so no parents with them.  It’s child abuse to send your kids into another country with gangs/cartels and smugglers.

Family who arrive at ports of entry and request asylum will not be prosecuted because they have not attempted to enter the country illegally

Dosn't matter how U.S. presidents are elected....go find another foreign leader to save your "western democracy".    U.S. owes you nothing.

I'm a citizen of the U.S. That's more than you can say. Lol

Sure you are...and even if it was true, the U.S. still owes you nothing.

The positive trajectory that was established under Obama  is clearly starting to slip though. You'll be calling job numbers fake again once the tariffs kick in.

Of course it is, why didn't I think of that one 

Because you never looked at the trajectory of job gains on a graph, obviously.

Trudeau already took 4.7 billion from CPP to pay for it. Now he's thinking about using CPP for infrastructure. What happened to all the money already designated for infrastructure?

Meanwhile, here's China:

Quote

 

Meanwhile, another international summit is being held in China. President Xi Jinping is hosting a meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), a regional security bloc, in the eastern city of Qingdao.

President Vladimir Putin of Russia, as well as leaders from Iran, India, Pakistan, and four central Asian, are taking part.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44423072

Yes, maybe the U.S. should join the club of dictators instead. Good point.

The G7 has outlived its usefulness. The politics of member countries have changed since it was formed in the 70s. For example, Canada has veered to the left and Trudeau is more concerned about raising gender issues and climate apocalypse than advancing democracy, which should be the focus of these talks.

China isn't a free democracy. 

Lol.  Nothing is said about democracy!

Quote

The Group of Seven or G7 is a group consisting of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. These countries, with seven of the largest advanced economies in the world,^[1] represent more than 62% of the global net wealth ($280 trillion). ^[2][3] The G7 countries also represent 46% of the global gross domestic product (GDP) based on nominal values; and 32% of the global GDP based on purchasing power parity.^{[4][not in citation given]} The European Union is also represented at the G7 summit.

If it's okay for these nations to aggressively seek trade with China....China should be among them.

China named world's third most powerful country

https://gbtimes.com/china-named-worlds-third-most-powerful-country

Well, maybe if China were savvy about buying and owning presidents, they would have someone willing to get them in without having to meet the basic standards. 

If liberals insist that only fascists will defend borders, voters will hire fascists to do the job. - David Frum

There is no way the Islamophiles would ever allow mosques in Canada to be scrutinized,

Wow!  Who knew that Islamophiles held so much power in Canada as to prevent the carrying out of legal investigations!  

Or is this perhaps just more of the alt-right propaganda about the dangers of immigration, Muslims and the Leftist agenda to ruin Canada?  Not that anyone here is alt-right of course; merely a bunch of citizens concerned about immigration, Islam and the leftist agenda to ruin Canada.

Some of you folks should find some historical propaganda and do a comparison on what you believe about Muslims and Islam against the claims made against the Irish, Jews, Catholics, Japanese and Eastern Europeans at different times in history.  Perhaps the similarities would make you as sick as they made me.

Yup.  No problems with Islam.  It's all "propaganda".

Submit a court reference against Trudeau's carbon tax

Set up an independent forensic financial review of Ontario's books.

Yep.  let's see what's been cooked!

No need to tell us, it's obvious every time you post.

Ha ha. Trumpy guy is clever.

Obviously you're not, and you're not afraid to show it. Well done.