betsy

The only clownish comment came from Justin Trudeau. Read the OP.

That's not the point, either.

Yep. That's why I'm calling out Trudeau - for his comment on Poilievre's speculation about the bitcoin. Trudeau did more than simply speculate - he actually bought the second-hand pipeline. Too bad, he did it with OUR MONEY!

I copy/pasted the news headline from the source. I copy/pasted the rest from my post at the other forum. There's no way to reduce the font size here. I looked at the options for sizes - I don't have it showing anymore. We are still allowed to use colors, are we? they're still available. I don't care! THAT'S NOT THE POINT!

YES! Some folks can't seem to read normal fonts! Especially, left-leaning ones. Must be in their DNA! So - what have you got to say to the OP - THE MESSAGE! Isn't Trudeau funny for criticizing and warning us about Poilievre's speculation, when he (Trudeau) did more than just speculate! Trudeau had actually bought and threw away billions........FOR NOTHING! The other guy in the other forum who dared bring up the bitcoin comment of Trudeau has got his mouth zipped! He, of course, blamed by emojis for the excuse - to which I graciously reassured him that had he read it, he wouldn't be able to answer anyway! ? Hahahahahaha ? If you can't tell the point - despite all those big fonts and and capitalized letters - have you asked yourself - perhaps this kind of discussion isn't for you?

I'll check it out. Thanks.

Yep. That's what they're trying to do. Pierre knows it too, that's why he refuses to answer questions.

Based on your comment - I just want to know if you'd finally become a Christian. I guess, not. First, that photo. Now, your claim. Michael - is that a pattern with you? Giving MISLEADING posts?

Go and read. If you can't understand the simple explanation - the subject may not be for you.

Lol - that's up to people to decide. Trudeau makes himself a caricature by calling Poilievre irresponsible. Trudeau never even gave us a chance to decide what's to do with our money. Have we had a referendum on buying that second hand pipeline? NO. Trudeau regards taxpayers money as HIS money!

Why? Daniel drew a line. You better go back and understand the rationale.

Do you accept Christ as your Saviour?

I am!

Justin Trudeau slams conservative party leader over “irresponsible” views on Bitcoin https://insidebitcoins.com/news/justin-trudeau-slams-conservative-party-leader-over-irresponsible-views-on-bitcoin Hahahahaha I thought Justin was a drama teacher. Nobody said he was a comedian! ? First of all - Poilievre has his rights to express his views! Second - Pierre is sharing his views. UNLIKE YOU - YOU'VE RAMMED YOUR "VIEWS" ON US! DON'T TALK TO ME ABOUT, "IRRESPONSIBLE!" You don't know what it means. Trudeau had set us back billions of dollars by buying a second hand pipeline which we could've had for free - assuring us that it will be profitable. TRUDEAU GOT US INTO BUYING THAT SECOND HAND PIPELINE! He used............................... and, MIS-USED our money! What happened to that pipeline? It turned out to be a pipe dream! CAN YOU IMAGINE THAT? TRUDEAU HAS DROPPED IT! Thrown it out! No profit in it, he admits. Threw away billions! Just like that. Trudeau has gotten us to throw billions for nothing! And he has the gall to warn us? Hahahahaha ?

Lol - I can't condemn the REBEL, because I don't follow Rebel News. We used to have FOX News way back - the only right-wing channel. What happened?

I'm not going to keep explaining. You ought to review some of my posts at least. Anyway............... WHATEVER.

You just have to go back and read my explanation. Go to religion section. I think I've given the detailed explanation there.

WHOOOOO-HOOOO! I'm all for you, Melissa!!!! Hey @DogOnPorch - have you seen this?

The talking heads complain, Polievre has avoided the press gallery! BRAVO, PIERRE! Keep doing so. Just focus on social media to get your message across. There's no difference between social media and the press gallery anyway - they deliver disinformation as bad as social media. We have to do our own research - to know what is truth, or fake news!

Akin tries to justify: "WE all want to hear politicians answer questions....." It depends on the quality of the question, and the motive for the question. Viewers aren't as ignorant as they used to be, Mr Akin. We can tell who's a true journalist - working by the ethics that's a standard for journalism. And of course.....viewers are used to hearing the delivery of the message before any questions. Questions come AFTER. That's how it's done. Have you got that?

I explained why. It's not her dancing - it's the appearance of what I mistook to be the caucus celebrating the appointment of 2 LGBTQ. Lol - you can like me however you want it, Michael. If thinking me "woke" is so important and feels so comforting to you - hey, to each his own. If I can be of any help to your well-being.......go for it.

And all those "talking heads" on CTV with Evan Solomon - who shallowly say, "yes David Aiken went out of line.....but, he apologised for it." And then get this, they freakin' focused on the fact that Poilievre called Akin a "LIBERAL HECKLER!" Why wouldn't Poilievre think and say that? I thought that myself - without being told! That's how it looked like on tv, oh you talking idiots! That's their issue! The talking heads nimbly turned the situation around to focus the attack on Poilievre instead. And they wonder why people have lost trust in the media? Hello? You treat us like idiots!

....with CENSORSHIP! I'm sick and tired of it! Livid with being held hostage by a mostly biased, if not leftist propaganda Liberal or ANTI-CONSERVATIVE machines! Who the heck voted for this GLOBAL NEWS idiot - David Aikin - to censor what I'm trying to hear? I want to hear what Poilievre was going to say, not some freakin undisciplined and unethical trashy reporter from Global News yapping it up - disrupting and being disrespectful not only to Poilievre, but especially to................................. ME - the viewer! I didn't interrupt my routine to hear a freakin reporter with his issues! I was there to hear what this candidate for PM was going to say! If this immature, UNPROFESSIONAL man who calls himself a journalist wants to question Poilievre - then, freakin get in line, idiot! I want to listen to Poilievre's message - not your stupid questions! I'm not the only one! Btw..... Have you apologised to Mr Poilievre?

In my reflection - what a tremendous comfort this biblical fact gives to me. The prophet Daniel didn't have any problems serving under a PAGAN king. However, he boldly and determinedly drew the line on worship.

As that photo had misled me to think it was a celebration of having appointed LGBTQs and being cheered by caucus, you should point out that the photo was taken in year 2018, at the wedding of Melissa. Thanks for DOP for clarifying that. The photo had been the reason for me to question if it clashes with my Christian belief - basing it on a particular Biblical verse. So far, Poilievre hasn't done anything to promote and endorse values that are not acceptable to a lot of Christians. People are not being forced to accept anything that goes against their conscience. In fact, that he's running on FREEDOM - particularly, expression - being himself, a believer in God, he'll also protect religious freedom/expression. That, to me, is quite important. That he acknowledges and admit to his stance of being progressive - being pro-choice and acceptance of same-sex marriage - that, to me, is his prerogative. I welcome his honesty on the matter. Like all of us, he is entitled to his free will. That's what free will is all about. I have no problem that he'd appointed LGBTQs or women or whatever for his team.....hoping that it's not only done as a political convenience but as also acknowledgment of their merit. That's how it's supposed to be - giving responsibilities thru merits. I'd doubt he'll appoint anyone who can't meet the challenge of a portfolio, which will cause him an embarrassment. It is biblical to treat people equally. To treat foreigners and immigrants living among us fairly, as we would treat our own people. The prophet Daniel didn't have any problem serving under a PAGAN king. However, he drew the line on worship. That is a comfort to me. On casting my vote - for me, it is looking at the BIG PICTURE.