sharkman

This is what the left just can't comprehend because they don't see it on their TV screens. Gays being sentenced to death for being gay, while in our Western culture gays are accepted on most levels. Western culture, influenced by Christianity is doing much better than cultures influenced by Islam. The Falwells and Robertsons may have their opinions, but they don't call for the deaths of gays lilke Islam does.

If left alone perhaps the two snakes (hamas and al Fatah) would pretty much behead each other leaving the region in relative peace. It's too bad Israel can't deal with the rocket attacks by way of a Patriot Missile type of system that would simply shoot them down. Hopefully one day such a system will be reliable.

What does any of that have to do with the subject of this thread, Gore's book on American Politics. If you want to get on a rant, start a rant thread.

I've tried to figure out why Jimmy keeps doing stuff like this, as if he's relevant anymore. Do you suppose it's just an attempt to atone for his term and then his drastic failure with Korea?

When did you hear this, that sounds too far out to be true!

Here's a weird example, Kirkland Jeans, from Costco, are made in Canada and are around $17 a pr. Super cheap, and they are actually decent. I don't know how they do it, all other clothes are made offshore and cost at least double.

It is not one incident. If you view the video, they show 4 I believe. It might be a norm that PP is keeping hidden, and it needs to be exposed.

It's deja vu time. . . A new party can spring up, split the conservative vote and we can have 13 more years of Liberal rule. If a tiny loose knit group beats the million to one odds to form a right wing party, it would only fly in Alberta where conservatives regularly get landslides. No worries.

This is really sad, PP is counseling girls 13 to 15 to lie about their age, or the boyfriend's age in order to avoid Rape laws in the United States. In one case, a teenager is bringing a law suit against PP for not reporting her incestual relationship which resulted in her being abused for another 18 months! Where is the media on this?

knock off the trolling, will you? You show your ignorance of fundamentalists, christians and pavlov's dog.

And just as obviously those particular battles can not be happening in a vacuum away from the other parties, now can they?

Thank-You for bringing that to my attention, I wondered what the problem was, now I KNOW. rofl!!! ;-) editted: thereby to reduce quotations as per forum request, and to make it easier for sharkman, in case he has already responded to said posting above , without my knowledge. lol There you go kuzy, I think you're catching on! Edit: Higgy, it sounds like you are bored again, maybe you should play a few rounds on the old xbox.

Yes, I suppose the U.S. can't expect all of their conflicts to occur without aid to their enemies when they've done so much of that in the past.

No, I haven't. I try not to view material that could be considered propaganda and I'm highly suspicious of most pieces to do with the environment. There is too much disagreement for there to be a consensous, no matter what Gore says.

Now that's a fresh streak in the analysis (or maybe not so fresh, but who cares). If only it could be proven to any credible extent - I mean more credible than those (in)famous WMDs? My logic is straightforward. Here is where you deny there are Iranian weapons in Iraq, and make it about as likely as WMDs being in Iraq. When I show proof that weapons from Iran ( with a date from the Iranian factory of 2006) are indeed in Iraq, you change tactics and say its not unlike the U.S. having weapons in foreign countries. This is unrelated to whether Iran does in fact have weapons in Iraq or not. Again, Iran and Iraq have been enemies. Therefore, Iran would not normally want to allow its weapons into Iraq, anymore than the U.S. would sell weapons to China. But just as the U.S. gave weapons to those fighting the Russian army in Afghanistan in the eighties, Iran is now giving weapons for those fighting the American effort in Iraq. If you don't want to accept this, at least provide some information ( a link) disagreeing with my information. And I'm not saying anywhere that Iran should be sanctioned for this. I never said that anywhere. I simply said it's happening, and Iran is partly responsible for the mess there. I also did not say anywhere in any of my remarks that Iran was officially sanctioning aid to the insurgency.

Quit playing games. You said 'nope' you hadn't changed your post #27. Then you took the word 'nope' out of the post (#34) and said in a following post you thought I was accusing you of changing Betsy's post, like that was possible. There is no need to cover up your tracks. Just say what you mean, and if you think of something later, edit your post by adding information at the bottom under the heading 'Edit'. If you can't be trusted to post fairly, no one will want to debate with you.

"No I was just bored and you lot were ticking me off." Ah, so you lied then. I will keep that in mind when debating with you.

You are probably referring to one specific case in which extenuating circumstances occured, or at least in one state only. Then you do the typical American bashing thing and extrapolate it into an American norm. How typical. I see now, this happened in YOUR universe

It seems that the American model has turned out superior to the European model of immigration and I wonder if it's because of Europe's cowardice.

How about using some accuracy in your posts. Show us in what universe this was considered justifiable.

Have you watched Faranheit 9/11, and then the powerful documentary debunking it as well?

Myata, context is everything. That Iranian weapons are next door in Iraq (and the two are historic enemies)and are being used to fight the American effort, there is no other reason. Further, first you deny their are any Iranian weapons at all, linking the possibility to WMD's, then you change tactics and provide a strawman. Make up your mind.

No, this is the position that cyber holds about religion.

What, the right of center voters are bleeding off to the left wing party? Nice try! But as long as the Liberals have to compete for the left with the Greens and NDP and the center with the Tories, (notwithstanding the Green's agreement with the Liberals), I can hardly wait for voting day. Jdobbin, I believe you have me mixed up with someone else, I never said the Republicans would smash the Dems.

Look, I will say it plainly. When you make a post, other people respond to the content and points you make. If you are going to change the content and meaning of your post, you need to let others know by putting it at the bottom with an "edit" or somewhere so it's plain what you are doing. Nothing wrong with that. When you change your post after others have responded to it, like I mentioned earlier where you took out the word, "nope" and instead inferred that you didn't understand when you clearly did, you are playing games. This Makes the following posts that disagree with you confusing, and it's a form of cheating when someone refutes your point and you then remove it instead of replying to their counterpoint. Play by the rules.