LinkSoul60

You appear to hold society in reverence. Liberals and all 🤙

I agree on immigration. What multi-billion dollar agency? Do you mean providing long-term 'financing'? Agree, less bureaucracy in that space. Not sure what you mean by regulations?

From negotiating with the man child to China to Muslims to organized crime... Okay. The conservatives would instantly agree to what.... giving Trump what he wants? So what would Poilievre do, or what would be your suggestion?

The time frame is long but won't disagree that it's aspirational. I agree that we need to lessen immigration numbers. Not convinced on TFW's though. I don't know much about the phony asylum seekers.

Absolutely a drop in the bucket but it's something different on federal land as a start. Agree that slowly densifying existing areas that are serviced is the most logical and cost effective route. We've been seeing that for a lot of years now with multi-family starts well outpacing single family. Fair to say affordabilty has a lot to do with that but the developers are looking at that reality and building what the group of people they're targeting can afford. I also like the idea that I saw on the outskirts of Calgary 20 (?) years ago. They had the luxury of land so spread out and built densified 'communities'. The communities still needed to be serviced but there was a large tax base to help support it. Saw/seeing the same thing in Tsawwassen with 'Southlands' a densified community. Of course you need land for that though... I honestly don't know what affordable is though other than 'affordable it what you can afford'. I'm real curious to see what that affordable end price is going to be.

To think... all that baggage that liberals carry and still allowed to vote and be members of society. I love this country!

And some have tattoos.

I told you why I voted Liberal and again, if you don't like that you can shove it somewhere. Always good to hear from another crying conservative though.

First of all I owe you absolutely zero explanation as to who I voted for and why I did, but I did. If you don't like that take it and shove it somewhere that will come out later. Yes, it is sad there are sorry people like you still disappointed in yet another election loss. That's not my problem, it's yours.

Because I think Carney is the right guy for these times. I also think very little of Poilievre's acumen, and certainly don't like his schtick. Anything else you'd like to know? I'm here because it's an open forum. Is that a problem for you?

You mean Aber...jan don't you? I honestly thought his first term was more comical than anything. I couldn't believe that a person in that position could actually be that stupid, but he proved me wrong. I don't think this term is funny at all though, but little bits like that remind me of why I laugh at him in those not so serious instances. He obviously missed the Fun with Phonics classes in elementary school, and I think every other class. His false information is such anymore that people are numb to it...and that's dangerous.

lol... did you see the background to those comments? He was asked how he's dealing with his 'good buddies' death and spent 2 seconds on that before rambling about a ballroom being updated. The empathy shown is truly touching....

America IS going down the road taken by Hungary and Turkey. Whether it becomes an autocracy remains to be seen but we can be assured that he's going to try....

Poilievre says lots of things like most politicians do. If that's your 'better leader' then be ready to complain for another 10 years... Because I don't like Poilievre you don't think I understand so I'm supposed to justify why I voted Liberal? lol...be serious!

Only conservatives care about the country? Again, find a leader and you may have more of a say in which direction the country takes. Good to see that you're hopeful for a better country 👍

Sorry but I'm still not following.... Housing is an issue and they're trying to address with Build Canada Homes on federal land. It's not the be all to end all but it add's homes, which is what we need. Where's the problem?

The US could care less what Carney has to offer. They only care about what they want. What do you suggest, give them everything they want? No, I took down my Trudeau posters last week and have moved on. Okay, so the cons got 41% of the vote. So what, other than not giving the liberals a majority. Your boy had a 25% lead in the polls and still lost. Find a new leader with a new schtick...

What exactly are you talking about? 50k homes where....we average 200k and need to essentially double that. Yeah, we need more housing but what exactly are you trying to say? My bad if not following....

So good.... the wannabe dictator is taking it up a notch; Trump on Jimmy Kimmel: Networks that only criticize him ‘not allowed to do that’ “I read someplace that the networks were 97 percent against me. Again, 97 percent negative, and yet I won and easily won all seven swing states. The popular vote, won everything,” Trump told reporters. “They’re 97 percent against; they give me only bad press. I mean, they’re getting a license,” he continued. “I would think maybe their license should be taken away.” Trump said that decision would ultimately be left up to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chair Brendan Carr, whom Trump praised as a “patriot” and a “tough guy.”

The problem as I see it is that some people can only see or hear the reality they're told to see and hear. Why this isn't a blatant warning sign for anyone in the US that cares about democracy is beyond me.... This is just starting..., Lots more to come.

Find a leader for the opposition party and I'll consider it if Carney fails, which I don't expect him to.

No, I'm not supportive of innocent people being murdered... kind a stupid question don't you think?

As best he can, he's doing fine with Trump. If you read Hoekstra's comments it's clear Carney doesn't believe whatever the US proposal of trade was is good for Canada, which is why it's not done. If you think in any way that Canada has more poker chips on the table than the US, you're dreaming. You got the 'couple offices and a couple people' from Poilievre, right? It's doesn't matter to me who you think I have or haven't voted for over the years, but I'll refrain from commenting too much on your last paragraph of leaders. Canadian's don't like the one the conservatives have so when they find a viable one we can revisit.

With all due respect, your math is real bad. Canada averages ~200K housing starts a year. Without looking up immigration numbers I'll take your word for it which getting back to starts, we need to essentially double that in the next 10 years to meet demand and affordability. Carney's not a fool and knows the masses are fed up with our immigration levels. I'd be willing to bet the immigration system and new entrants will be tweaked to meet today's reality. So the project foundations announced mean nothing? As the saying goes....have to start somewhere, and I think this is a good start. Why don't you?

In your words 10 years to wreck it, yet complaining that Carney hasn't fixed it in 6 months. Do you honestly think that's realistic? Complain away.... you do it well. And yes, I'll continue to support Carney and this government until such time that I see nothing positive happening. I have difficulty with buying into your conservative teaching moments' though. The Harper years were a decade plus ago, and he's long forgotten.