User

Well, since you ran away from this up until now, yeah. You have highlighted the stupidity at play - Woman is an adult female. Ok, so a woman is a female. You have to define female now. What is a female? The real stupidity is saying a trans woman was “identified” as male at birth, as if it were some mistake or something and they are really a female. So… back to what is a female then? Nothing confusing for me, I’m just pointing out the dishonesty and stupidity you are engaged in supporting here. Because if being a “female” is simply a matter of identifying as one, then the definition is meaningless for what a woman is.

More non specific garbage. What are you even talking about? Can you provide any specifics?

Still running like the coward you are! If I recall, we had a discussion like this some months ago, same thing then too. You ran away once you were pressed to answer this question and got all pissy about it.

Look at you still running from the question. LOL

Not about me needing anything. Just me pointing out how pathetically dumb and dishonest you are. If you want to copy/paste whatever woke revised definition you can find, go for it, and all that will prove is how you are using a dumb definition that almost certainly plays the stupid game of using the term to define the term. I mean, it shouldn't matter what I say or do, if it is a definition you are proud to stand behind, you wouldn't hide from doing so. Reality is, you know it is going to be dumb, so like many other leftists, you just refuse to do it, so you can go on pushing the absurdity that men who think they are women are women. Its fun watching you leftists squirm and run like cowards with such a silly easy question.

Still no meaningful definition. Just dishonest games because you want to pretend dudes can be women.

You didn’t.

Yeah, we know they are dudes. That is the problem.

I can define woman in a meaningful way. You can’t. You are the clown here.

There are no experts in any real scientific studies in the field of men pretending to be women, fairly competing against them... This is all made-up crap in search of a solution to a predetermined and desired outcome, motivated not by scientific truth, discovery, or fairness but by forcing men into women's sports. Nor does any of this address men in women's spaces or butchering children so they look like something they are not. You are a clown.

First, whatever you posted that from isn’t a universal standard for every country, high school, or sporting governing body. Second, so what? You might as well have said the standard is that they must have hair and eat at McDonalds. These are arbitrary things determined by the same leftists who allowed it in the first place. They don’t prove anything more than how much people like you will contort things to force this shit into real women. Third, these standards still don’t make competition fair. Men continue to have biological traits that make them bigger and stronger. Which is why you see this line of reasoning being rejected. Fourth, this doesn’t address your pushing drugging and butchering children or men into women’s spaces. So much for you thinking so much of yourself here. LOL

What does this have to do with anything?

Except you are unable to put forth an actual fact based discussion to back up saying I’m ignorant with any shortcomings… My ego isn’t the issue here, it’s your wanting to push dudes into women’s spaces and their sports as well as your wanting to butcher and drug children to appear to be something they are not.

You keep talking about it. You only don't care when it comes to backing up the BS assertions you make.

When you sit here using the obviously absurd on their face extremes of "Nothing," that is irrational. Now you want to play dumb and not even remember what you said 5 seconds ago.

Same old stupid dishonesty. YOU clowns dragged Greta Thunberg around the world to all the big government climate change events and other big political gatherings, including the UN, to use a child to lecture the world about climate change and push the irrational fear mongering. YOU guys did that.

How exactly is the country of Cuba being collapsed? You mean... we seized unmarked ships engaged in the black market oil trade headed there and refused sanctioned Russian oil ships going there? Are you now a big supporter of Russia selling its oil on the black market?

Wait a minute, are you telling us that politicians have people they represent and might sometimes agree with their positions that they advocate for and represent them?! Wow! What next, will you tell us about how water is wet or how the sky looks blue?

So, no. Sorry, not interested in your excuses and fabrications.

Kind of... No. The answer is still no.

You live in Blaine, Washington? Clown.

Yeah, June 2016. Trump was not President for 4 years, you clown. What "case" was there? This was an anonymous affidavit with no details. That is not a "case" and there was nothing to drop.

You mean, run away from your NATO spending obligations like you have been year after year? So... it is a lie that Canada has not been meeting its NATO spending obligations?

Nothing? Once again, you only prove that you are the one with irrational hate.

If you have such a good understanding of how profits motivate or do not motivate people, why did you say what you did about profits? Trying to change the subject, again, to making up crap about me doesn't change what you said.