User

Yes, I have pointed this out to you over and over again. You run away like the dishonestly cowardly liar you are.

Another thread where I have repeatedly pointed out facts to prove my point that @BeaverFever cowardly runs from and lies about. You ignore all of that, though. Did you take any time to actually review how Beaver was being dishonest before criticizing me for calling him dishonest?

To be fair, I think both of them have been consistent here... it is the other leftists on the forum who certainly will avoid this thread just as they did most of them on the male boxer too...

You ignored this part... Sure... but the point is that you repeatedly lied and denied the facts, that the trees were in fact part of a special program to plant trees, not normal landscaping that would occur anyhow, and that these trees were then counted as part of defense spending. It is just a simple fact. Yet you had to go on denying it and lying about it and now running away from just admitting you were wrong.

Yet again, YOU started this thread. As usual, folks like you want to push this crap but then run away when challenged, so you can keep pushing it.

Yes, you have. Notice how you completely avoid the subject here and try to misdirect to things that were not in contention between us: 1. Tree planting planned years ago <- Not the point in discussion between us 2. Trees are "inappropriate" expenses <- Subjective, and again, not the point in discussion between us 3. NATO approved this as an expense <- Again, not the point in discussion between us This is what you usually do, you type out a bunch of shit, to filibuster, to deceive, to continue to be dishonest and avoid your lies and the point. You think if you can just BS your way out with typing up a bunch of crap, that will do something. No. It will not. I know your dumb games now. You have done this for as long as I have been here on numerous topics. You get caught saying something ignorant, get called out, then turn it into a repeated lie rather than just admit you were wrong then run away, then if you do respond come up with some lengthy bullshit that has nothing to do with anything. Again: The point is that you repeatedly lied and denied the facts, that the trees were in fact part of a special program to plant trees, not normal landscaping that would occur anyhow, and that these trees were then counted as part of defense spending. It is just a simple fact. Yet you had to go on denying it and lying about it and now running away from just admitting you were wrong.

Now you are reduced to saying it is a trivial amount of money. Sure... but the point is that you repeatedly lied and denied the facts, that the trees were in fact part of a special program to plant trees, not normal landscaping that would occur anyhow, and that these trees were then counted as part of defense spending. It is just a simple fact. Yet you had to go on denying it and lying about it and now running away from just admitting you were wrong.

You didn't know what you were talking about with the trees either, repeatedly lied, over and over again, and now you are running away like you usually do.

Yet again, YOU started this thread. As usual, folks like you want to push this crap but then run away when challenged, so you can keep pushing it.

Can't you actually respond to the facts instead of just acting like no one is ever dishonest?

Yet again, YOU started this thread. As usual, folks like you want to push this crap but then run away when challenged, so you can keep pushing it.

Yet again, you ignore all that was said: “Ultimately, that means killing his heart and raising him up to new life in Christ.”

This was just the Olympics. Of course, you say there is not much to debate, but then act like the overall problem is solved and we can move on. This is the duplicity I have come to expect on this subject.

I literally pointed out the dishonesty with how you cherry-picked the quote you did. You ignored that.

I would add, they say "open" in the quote above, but lets not forget the whole controversy with the male boxer Imane Khelif in the 2024 Olympics competing against women. Remember how all the leftists on here defended him?

The chicken runs...

Finally. Getting back to some common sense. How this was ever allowed to begin with should not be forgotten. The leftists the last 5 years were full speed ahead with this madness and are still pushing it now wherever they can. Still have to keep pushing back to protect women and little children from them. IOC bans transgender women athletes beginning with LA Games in 2028 https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/2026/03/26/ioc-bans-transgender-athletes-beginning-los-angeles-games/89329480007/ "International Olympic Committee president Kirsty Coventry announced the change Thursday, March 26, reversing its 2004 decision to allow the participation of transgender athletes. To date, only one openly transgender woman has competed at the Olympics in 2021, a weightlifter from New Zealand who did not make it past her opening round of competition at the Tokyo Games."

You can't even stick around to discuss any of the stupid crap you post on here about anything, let alone Christianity. Chicken. Try not to be the coward you are.

Ah, yes, you have spent pages lying about the trees, and now all you are left with is ignoring those lies and mocking them instead. The trees were only one part of what was being called out as an effort to try to find anything and everything they could scrape up to call defense spending, so they could meet the target. Then you spent days on here and numerous posts spanning pages of this thread, lying about it.

How was any of this fake news? The fact that you are finally meeting it now doesn't make it fake news to call out that you failed to do so before. From the article that started this thread: Actual defence spending totalled $45.4 billion, leaving Ottawa roughly $4.6 billion short of the commitment it had vowed to meet by December 31.

These were the definitions YOU provided.

So, to finish where we left off: You were pushing an absurd definition of Woman and Trans Woman, where both used "female" in the definition as if a trans woman (a dude with a dick and balls and male chromosomes) was just *oops* my bad, identified as what they actually are - a male - and really they are a female! So... rendering "female" as meaningless as it is nothing more than what someone claims to be... rendering "woman" as meaningless. All so you can push the absurdity of men with mental problems into women's spaces, and into their sports, so you can all get your jollies off the pain and suffering of women (real women).

How is it highly unethical? The price is adjusted according to current market demand.

Leftists' idea of "diplomacy" means sucking up to the world and ignoring problems. It's the same mentality that drives their wanting to leave the crazy people on the streets with 100 arrests until they stab someone on the subway and then turn around and want to get someone for murder when they try to stop a crazy person on the subway from killing people.

My favorite was when, some years back, Leonardo DiCaprio was lecturing the world at a climate summit. Dude had an SUV driving him to the airport from his yacht to get on his private jet... ROFL