User

Do you really not believe this? It seems your requests are coming across more as sea lioning right now... https://abc3340.com/news/nation-world/the-view-host-suggests-caitlin-clark-aided-by-white-privilege-not-being-lesbian-sunny-hostin-wnba-iowa-indiana-fever-basketball-nba-the-view-abc-race-lgbtq

Perhaps you don't follow American pop culture stuff or recent political events, but in the past couple of weeks, this has been all over the news with how certain talking heads are upset that only after a pretty white girl like her makes it to the WNBA does it become more popular and other black WNBA players have been targeting her with hard fouls and others celebrating that and other famous figures celebrating and encouraging that behavior.

Exactly. What was this unlawful means? Citing this as Hodad did doesn't explain that at all.

No one does.

This is true... but it is what the FBI didn't do that is the problem. They knew then that all the claims about it being disinformation were not true and they remained silent. Their silence was just as condemning as they allowed it to happen. They had already been regularly meeting with social media companies and were proactively working with them to advise and provide information to combat false stories... but when this came up, they said nothing. In fact, they said no comment. They allowed the story that it was all Russian disinformation to run.

Why is that a problem?

Not everyone did that. Your being ignorant or dishonest of this fact doesn't make me a liar. This is exactly my point. The folks who merely wandered around and left are being maliciously persecuted. The DOJ is trumping up charges to go after folks. Can you not read? I very specifically said "misdemeanor-level offenses", that is not violence.

Directed is your word, not mine. Biden appointed Garland, he doesn't have to direct him to do every little thing, he certainly isn't stopping them either. Biden sets the tone, Biden hires these people. Biden is responsible for what is going on.

It is simply amazing the lengths you will go to to argue the most obviously absurdly wrong points. Old is subjective... not going to quibble over someone almost 50 years old being called "old" or not. He was a goon. He had a history of instigating crap. Mark Houch was across the street and that goon was the one who went out of his way to cross the street to instigate crap with them. No, the legal definition behind assault is literally what he did. He got in their faces, their personal space, to verbally insult them, including his 12 year old son. Of course, you don't care... and this is EXACTLY why I cheer on Trump being vindictive because that is exactly what you are doing here. They were across the street protesting, they were not harassing anyone. The goon had to come across the street to confront them. Decent people do not go across the street to verbally accost and assault 12-year-old kids peacefully protesting. The father was investigated by local authorities and they found his claims to be valid and there is video of it. He was only shoving that goon to keep him from continuing to accost his son. That is not a federal crime. The FACE act deals with obstructing access to the abortion clinic. Hell, even if Mark did really wrongly attack the goon, he could have beaten him half to death on the ground... that has nothing to do with the FACE act. They were across the street, nothing they were doing there was obstructing access to the abortion clinic. That is precisely why using the FACE act to go after him, even after local authorities investigations cleared him, was a vindictive use of the DOJ, on top of the fact they sent the FBI to arrest him at his home. This is precisely why we need Trump to go after folks on the left the same way, because maybe then you will get it.

Not much difference between the Palestinians / Hamas and the Nazis at all, other than the Nazi's had the power to systematically round up and kill a whole lot more Jews than Hamas had the power to do, thankfully. I deny your spelling capabilities.

Why don't "we," as in the Biden administration, even care? I can't even remember the last time he or anyone mentioned them or demanded their release or made any real efforts at public pressure campaigns to do so.

Ukraine is the good guy... HERE. It doesn't matter how corrupt you think they were, you claim you want peace... their being corrupt doesn't somehow make Russia the good guy for invading them. Yet here you are... basically justifying it again. The funny thing is that Russia is just as corrupt at a minimum, if not obviously more so. Yet... you continue to ignore them with your ire. Oh really... so where does the blame belong then? Where are you placing it exactly? Again, this can end any number of ways, you support it ending in the most beneficial way to Russia, on their terms, leaving Ukraine high and dry.

I just gave you two examples of this reality. The Biden DOJ dredged up a case that had already been dropped and investigated by local authorities to try to go after an old Catholic man. They sent an armed FBI team to his home to arrest him in front of his family with guns drawn when his lawyers had long ago told the DOJ he would gladly surrender to them if they decided to push forward with any actions to prosecute him. They had all the evidence and facts up to that point which showed it was the Abortion clinic goon that went across the street to instigate a confrontation with him and his son and only after he continually assaulted his son did he push the goon away. The Biden DOJ ignored all this, they were on a mission to use the FACE act to target abortion clinic protestors to send a message. The folks on J6 who didn't do anything more than wander around and leave did not attack anything or anyone.

The war can end many ways. You very specifically want the war to end by Ukraine surrendering and/or negotiating an end from a position of weakness with no NATO/US support. What you offer is anything but common sense and mostly built around pushing outright lies and Russian propaganda. So, what exactly is it I am concocting here? Cheering on Ukraine and being an independent thinker are not mutually exclusive things. Ukraine is the good guy here, the victim to evil Russian aggression. Why wouldn't I cheer them on? You see, when you post crap like this, it reveals your intentions and motivations - which are clearly skewed to supporting Russia. So, the question is not why I would cheer on Ukraine. It is why you wouldn't? Why do you cheer on Russia and support them? This is an article from April... was there something in here specifically important to any point you were making here? Other than the fact that you are still ignoring all my questions?

Depends on the circumstances. We currently have an issue with school shootings being somewhat of a social contagion, and the political left thinks schools are magical places that should be gun-free zones... which leaves our children defenseless inside, and school shooters are able to kill many with no resistance. So, now you want to ensure that no one is there to help protect the kids from bad people?

Underfunded? As compared to what, where? Last time I checked, the US spends more on public schools than most other industrialized countries with far worse results. Public schools get huge sums of money. This is always the argument from the left here, that they need more $$$. There is never enough for them.

What are you rambling on about? It would help if you could form complete sentences with whole thoughts.

The stupidity. You say I am being extremely childish in the same sentence you tell me to try Exlax. Look in the mirror. Instead of dealing with the actual question I posed to you, you are the one resorting to such childish responses. You tried to push on here a few weeks ago that Russia was in some big offensive and that Ukraine needed to surrender, as if they couldn't hold out and argued they were stretched too thin and had no one left as if Russia was on the verge of some major offensive they couldn't stop. So... what happened? How far did they get? How hopeless was it for Ukraine? You don't like these questions because your narrative was destroyed.

There is no "normal" when it comes to packing the court. This is nothing more than wish casting of the most extreme kind of petty political partisanship from the left because you all want to politicize the court far more than you currently cry about it being. It is the same stupid hypocrisy with the left crying about saving Democracy by having to destroy it, cheering on the removal of a candidate from the polls so people can't even vote for them to "Save Democracy!" Packing the court is the term for doing something outside of "normal" to modify the courts for purely political purposes. Simply nominating and appointing Supreme Court justices as they retire as part of an ordinary course of business is not court packing. I understand it just fine, if you and others are reducing it to mean a President appoints someone because they are ideologically aligned with them... well, duh. That is what every President does. The term is meaningless at that point as every appointment is "court packing" No, that is a bad presumption on your part. So, where is your evidence?

And Ukraine is not going to surrender just because you keep saying they should either... Yeah, you repeatedly brought up this point in your efforts to demand Ukraine surrender to end this war, as if it was over and they just needed to see the light. So... is it over? How far has Russia made it? How much closer to Odessa did they get?

You want to reduce the income tax in conjunction and proportionally to this?

Not false at all. Need look no further than how Garland vindictively went after people with the FACE act. Or how the DOJ is currently going after folks associated with the lawlessness on January 6th for misdemeanor-level offenses while ignoring other violent criminals in left-leaning lawless protests.

Ukraine is defending itself. The war can quickly end when Russia's aggression ends. How is that big Russian offensive that you were practically cheering on a few weeks ago now going?... doesn't look like it is all over for Ukraine yet.

Then, the term is meaningless.

That is not what "pack the court" means.