Jump to content

User

Senior Member
  • Posts

    15,129
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    51

Everything posted by User

  1. Typical Beaver BS. You make the stupid false comment that none of these weapons were found in Iraq, period. I point out you are wrong. Again. You go off on some melt down tangent arguing things not said instead of just admitting you were wrong.
  2. I didn’t bring this up. I responded to your comment talking about this. So… now what do you have?
  3. Nothing you posted backs up calling him a racist or sexist. What are the qualifications for his position he doesn’t meet?
  4. The teacher was in the classroom though. Was allowed to remain for some time. And you are here still defending that madness by trying to downplay it being high school as if that makes it OK. Like I said from the start, once we found out about Noems husband, we are rightly denouncing it while you sit here defending someone doing far worse in front of children in a classroom. Mental illness certainly should be and in this instance the dude was wearing breasts absurdly large. Of course you defend this sickness being pushed onto children.
  5. Typical Beaver tactics. Pretend you don’t say what you did. You comment was “weapon system” that “delivers” and how hard it was to make and hide and now you try to act like you were just talking about the artillery shell. It isn’t hard to hide an artillery shell. “The weapon system that delivers the agent is more complex to produce and harder to hide than the agent itself.” Also… you are wrong yet again about finding none in Iraq. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/10/15/356360949/pentagon-reportedly-hushed-up-chemical-weapons-finds-in-iraq The Times reports in an extensive article:
  6. You were the kid who cried that your dad was a liar because he promised to come to your little league game but he got stuck in traffic due to no fault of his own. 30 years later you still call him a liar.
  7. I think you are confusing prayer with your posting style here.
  8. But when two people come together to form a marriage, something is born that wasn’t there before. It is a new entity. What you’re arguing is the same as pretending that a married couple is just two single people with a label slapped on, like nothing actually changed and we just call it something else. That’s really not how it works. The individuals didn’t just change their names. Different lives and different histories, with different experiences and perspectives, came together and created something new. A marriage is a Gestalt, it is more than the sum of its parts. It is new and distinct, with its own identity and its own history, just as a child is born of two parents and yet is something entirely new. As much as you want to pretend the marriage existed before it actually did, it didn’t. It only came into being when those two people chose to form it. That’s just the way it works. And just like that, whatever came before belongs to the individuals, not the marriage itself.
  9. But she didn’t just change her name! No! She is married. This was a union of two different people now becoming a new household, something new!
  10. This is a real question: can you read? No where have I insisted anyone bear any guilt.
  11. Holy shit, yet another thing you are woefully ignorant on. Chemical/Nerve agents are delivered using the exact same systems militaries already use every day… artillery shells, aerial bombs, rockets, missiles. It is just a different payload. You don’t need to “hide” anything. The plane dropping the bomb is the delivery system. The artillery battery firing shells is the delivery system.
  12. Of course! And if a woman gets married and changes her name, then all that history just before she was married is no longer hers either! She could have been a serial killer, bank robber, kidnapper... none of that is her history anymore! Don't you see, she changed her name, she is no longer Miss Smith, now she is Mrs Johnson! That as not here that did all those things!
  13. No, you are beyond stupid. I never said it was Kristi's husband. If you are too dumb, too lazy, or too incompetent to get into this discussion, just don't.
  14. OMG, you people and your playing dumb routine. I literally posted the picture from the classroom. First, you deny it, now you are here praising the man for wearing big boobs in front of a bunch of children in class.
  15. When it comes to doing it in the classroom to a bunch of kids, its worse. The fact that you can't grasp that only shows how depraved you are here as you scream about this and cheer on this dude in Canada.
  16. First, you say we need to move beyond identity politics... and a few posts later: LOOK HERE, MARRIED LESBIANS!
  17. First, I highly doubt your support for the Constitution when it is inconvenient for the leftist views you hold. Second, there is no evidence that Trump is a pedophile, and you are hanging your hat on calling him a felon from a complete abuse of the law to do so.
  18. The difference is that he was hiding his fetish and is now rightly being condemned now that it is public. As opposed to you Canadians who let freaks like this teach your children.
  19. Except that was not the question asked.
  20. Something tells me if this thread were titled: Is it morally acceptable to worry about the future of transgender people? You would not have this hard a time simply saying: Yes! Meanwhile, you are comparing us to animals when it suits your argument...
  21. I swear, you leftists are always expecting someone else to do something for you. You would walk past a homeless person starving on the street while eating your cheeseburger and then curse God for not helping them.
  22. You clearly have never served a day in your life nor know anyone who has. Hell, you can’t even be bothered to understand the chain of command.
×
×
  • Create New...