User

First, this is a complete non-sequitur. Yes, people die in a war... when you are exercising your free speech, there is no expectation that you are to get violently attacked for doing so.

Was there going to be an example of racism presented here?

It is not an either-or. You don't love someone by playing into their delusions or fantasies. What does hugging someone have to do with our discussion or any point you are making?

Apparently, you don't grasp the concept of free choice.

How do you know someone is just beating you down and then stopping before seriously hurting you or not? How do you know he didn't feel his life was in danger?

There is no ground to stand, he was jumped and driven to the ground, being attacked by the guy on top of him. Democrats like you are beyond ignorant or just outright liars about what stand your ground means. The US isn't the only country with violent crime or people being killed on the streets... its just the one where our citizens are more able to have the means to defend themselves.

If you watched the DA give her press conference, she was well aware that the "victim" ran across the street and violently attack the man and that the man was lawfully carrying a firearm. I do not have any confidence these charges will be dropped at all.

Because crazy people might just run across the street and violently attack them... Oh, hey, that's precisely what happened here.

No no no no no no no no no no no...... dont you see? Putin has entire divisions of full on ground troops just sitting in a field right now, waiting for the perfect moment to squash this. I can't explain why they are just sitting there or why he is waiting.... but don't you get it, this is an abysmal failure on Ukraine's part.

You have no interest in those things beyond using them as a dishonest talking point here.

Did you forget what we were discussing? You don't have to hate anyone to not want to participate in whatever they are doing...

No, not one guy. I am talking about YOU and all the other Democrats who cheer this one and justify targeting the person engaged in self-defense. Specifically here, the DA and all the other left-wing radical DA's folks like you support and elect to do this crap. I cited two other examples of it as well. We have no idea what this was other than a violent attack. When someone assaults you and has you on the ground, overwhelming you, you have no idea what their intentions are other than to cause you serious bodily harm. This is not some professional wrestling match in a ring with protection, rules, and a referee. Run away? You mean, like Rittenhouse was doing? That still didn't matter to you Democrats.

It was the same crap with Rittenhouse. It was the most clearly and extensively videotaped self-defense shooting I have ever seen, and the Democrats still went after him. I need to see how the NYC subway dude is doing with their prosecution of him for defending the train car from a crazy dude the Democrats let roam free.

Here, you have clear video evidence of a pro-Palestinian (Hamas supporter) person running across the street and violently attacking a pro-Israel demonstrator... the pro-Israel demonstrator shoots the man in self-defense, and he is the one being charged. Democrats hate self-defense. They protect the aggressors here yet again. There are no charges for the dude that initiated this assault. Nope... https://x.com/realDailyWire/status/1834397622909518073/video/1

You are not familiar with this case it seems and didn’t really read my comment either. We are not talking about someone LGBTQ walking into the shop, buying a cake or other baked goods, it was quite specifically an LGBTQ themed cake for an LGBTQ wedding. No hypocrisy on my part here.

Wow... this has nothing to do with what I said or your trying to call me a liar.

Nothing I said was a lie. Trump proposed additional debates before this, including one on Fox news. Harris cowardly refused. Those are facts.

They never agreed to any further debates because the coward Harris refused to do so. She would only agree to the ABC debate, and we can see why now. It was the moderators and her vs Trump.

At this point in time, AI is powered by massive industry of servers and computational power. It is not some abstract thing. You regulate it by regulating the industry running it.

Well, I think we do need to consider some regulations around its use and its capacity for fraud, deceit, and other illegal schemes. Outside of that, its the same old panic about replacing humans...

I work with AI daily. Right now, it is like an eager intern that thinks it knows everything. It still needs a lot of adult supervision to make sure its work is correct. Like most things, in my experience, it has become an enabler of more efficient work for humans, not replacing them. We are a long ways away from any kind of complete automation society.

Wow... Actually agree with most everything you said here.

Having your property taken from you without your consent is theft.

What is your home address? I will swing by and take whatever I want, but don't worry, I will leave you some small amount of money I think its worth. Totes cool huh? And? Plenty of Democrats who are anti-gun and want strict bans, buybacks, or as much gun control as they can push are gun owners. That doesn't change what she has said or advocated for.

Why do you think that? Existing legal precedents around the 10th and 14th Amendments are pretty clear on limiting the powers of Congress to pass such a nationwide kind of ban. US v Lopez, US v Morrison, City of Boerne v Flores.