User

For the good guys, yes. You folks on the left make sure the bad guys know they are almost certainly going to be the only ones armed in your magical gun free zones.

I can count just fine, apparently you can't. You seem to be counting each injection when they combine vaccines. The link you provided from Denmark = 11 different Vaccines given several different times. No, he contrasted it with saying: "Big Auto eventually pays for their mistakes. " Hence my saying... so did Purdue.

You are not arguing with me, you might as well go talk to yourself in notepad at this point. I told you want my argument was here, but all you have is the DURRRRR COVID DURRRRR Hammer and everything is your nail. When you stub your toe, do you curse "Big Pharma!" and the Covid vaccine? Get up to speed on what? You are just as bad as Goddess and ignored what I said.

Where do you get that I defend them? I merely pointed out a fact, as you and WestCanMan love to exaggerate (or outright lie)

Looks like they paid as well https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-global-resolution-criminal-and-civil-investigations-opioid

I no more hastily posted that then you asserted the book was all true.

I joined this discussion because Goddess falsely claimed the Vaccine schedules significantly differed between America and Denmark. Goddess then proceeded to ask a bunch of rhetorical questions and loaded questions with false claims to raise a phony doubt about vaccines in general in America. I have repeatedly tried to get Goddess to actually respond to that, but keep getting drug down this "Big Pharma" generalized garbage. You have not won anything. No, you made a false claim about the vaccine schedules, asked a bunch of dumb questions, some loaded with false assertions... THAT is what got me in this thread and responding to you. You have run away from ever responding to that though.

That is some circular logic... LOL. My source said he would pay anyone that proved him wrong, and since he has not done so, then my source is right about everything! You are not a serious person. So... you trust Big Pharma for some things... even after you have spent all this time railing against them. Perhaps you need to change your language if you are tired of the accusations. Just like with vaccines, you still won't admit that any of them are safe and good or give me any examples (other than COVID) that you think are bad on the schedule.

You are asking me this... but you couldn't even answer my question. You keep making these broad generalizations about "Big Pharma." Big Pharma is no one and nothing, its just a generalization. You are playing a deceitful game of impugning the entire industry and all of modern medicine over a handful of issues. I neither trust nor distrust "Big Pharma" as its just a generalization. What I don't do, is dismiss all modern medicine or in this case oppose all vaccines as if none of them work or can be trusted because of a few issues in the industry as a whole. You might as well ask me if I trust Big auto, because of all the recalls and safety issues and problems... OMG, we shouldn't ever drive! I mean, I hope you are walking everywhere, you can't trust Big Auto with your driving safety.

I must be really getting to you now, you are just outright resorting to petty name calling. I never said you have to verify Wiki is correct about anything. My response here is no more lazy than yours, where you say read this book, no one has proven any part of it is false! Um, yeah, several folks have.

Once again, you seek to ignore specific claims and dismiss the source... Wiki linked to the sources it provided, it was not the actual source. Beside, I only quickly provided that to demonstrate, again, that your claim about that book was absurdly wrong. If it will make you feel better, I can go pull one of the examples out of Wiki and link straight to that... but I guess you will just ignore me or dismiss that too.

I never said I only believe MSM headlines and nothing I have done here supports such an accusation. Clearly, you have no intentions of ever getting on responding to the criticism and questions you are confronted with to defend the bogus assertions you are making.

Good luck.

Give me your best estimate, ball park, how much of modern medicine can be trusted and how much do you just dismiss as dangerous and not to be trusted? You are coming across as nothing can be trusted and making broad, generalizing statements. You were the one who brought up the vaccine schedules. You did that. You are now running from addressing any of the questions or challenges I made.

OK, thanks...

So, you can't trust Big Pharma while "they" have the patents, but you can trust Big Pharma once the patent run out? Like, drug bad, no trust one day, Patent runs out, drug good, me trust now!

When you say, can't trust Big Pharma... maybe you need to be a bit more specific on what that means. You are not steering me anywhere. You need to go back to the source on what he means then and a better explanation.

But, no, you won't. Can't trust "Big Pharma" That is the point being made here.

Gee, you are dumber than I thought, and I thought you were pretty dumb before this. If I am mocking the concept of a gun-free zone... hmm... I wonder what the alternative to that is. I support SROs and increased security measures and practices including allowing teachers/staff to be armed.

Its funny how you get so upset about even the slightest hint you are an anti-vaxxer, even though I never said that... but you have no problems throwing around "vax fanatic" to label others. No, you made a dumb argument implying the book was 100% factual and no one had proven anything wrong in it yet. All I did was point out that there is a list of folks who have done just that. I did not dismiss the book out of hand. I have yet to reject any medical study here with you in any discussion we have had. You are the one rejecting the countless studies on vaccine safety. I have repeatedly asked you specific pointed questions, you run away. Well, I would like for you to be honest enough to defend your bogus assertions... but you choose not to. Instead, you call me names and run away. If you were interested in critical thinking, you would actually engage directly.

What does this even mean? So... you go into a hospital because your appendix needs removed. No medication for you? You going to do the surgery wide awake?

You don't have to see anything... I gave you rebuttal arguments with supporting evidence. You tried to claim something as silly as the MSM not reporting on other hospitals... but now you claim my showing you they did is an MSM source you will ignore? You put forth bogus information and bogus assertions and then run from criticism.

Looks like a bunch of folks have reviewed the book and pointed out its flaws. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Real_Anthony_Fauci

That is not what I said. I don't worship Fauci, I think he is a liar and told one of the worst most damning lies of my lifetime. Well, you can start with answering any of my specific questions... that is what is left to discuss. You seem to have a very particular bent against the pandemic response and the COVID vaccine... but your arguments go farther than that. You could start by directly engaging with me... offering specifics. I just tore apart your silly post on NYC pandemic stuff.

I am not asking you to educate me here as much as I am asking you to offer even a bare defense of what you assert. Its funny how you have all this time to spam the forum with these claims, but when asked to support them... now you don't have the time. I have a long list of books to read. Anything on Fauci is going to be years away. I am not here defending him anyhow...