User

That isn't the definition of money laundering. LOL There is no underlying illegality happening here that the money was gotten through illegal means to need to be laundered to look legitimate.

Most everything discussed here is from the perspective of North America. The point is that the flu is not as deadly as COVID was. And no, the average is closer to half a million if we are talking about the entire world. I have researched it myself. The link you shared did not say there was no flu and no flu deaths as you claimed. It supports what I claimed, that flu deaths and cases were lower than normal. It also goes on to support the reasons for why that I also put forth. No, I clearly stated my position. The flu was significantly less, it did not take a year off nor was there no deaths as you claimed. Listen dude, enough of the stupid games. I never said it was normal. You were the one who absurdly tried to assert there were no deaths. Nope. In his 50's. I didn't. You were the one trying to play the game that there were no COVID deaths as reported or that they didn't really happen because you don't know anyone. For the most part, yeah. There are always exceptions. So... first you claim no one died from the flu, and now you claim people did die from the flu. Please get back to me when you can figure out your position here. Which is it? I have zero interest in playing your dumb games built on these absurd, absolute statements. I already got sucked down your conspiratorial rabbit hole with the dumb flu assertion you made... and that turned out great, with you contradicting yourself in the very next post. Neither of those things saved the day. There are plenty of conspiratorial people who pushed them, tested them, and tried to make this claim. The only thing freaking people out is that folks like you push these conspiratorial lies that get people killed.

Oh yeah... of course. Biden is so great the entire party apparatus went into full panic mode after the debate to have a coup and remove him from the ballot. Now you folks pretend like he is just fine. The only silliness is yours.

Nothing to refute. When you see a pile of smelly shit on the floor, it is just a pile of smelly shit on the floor.

Except... there is no one crypto. But yeah, sure... LOL

Go reset yourself, you are broken.

Hi! I am new to the forum, let me start a thread on how we solve world peace. *facepalm*

No, this is a new issue... but sure, lets try to play this one out. I mean, you run from and obfuscate every other argument path you have tried so far. So, as long as we can provide the resources needed, then you oppose abortion? In the western world, we have a plethora of welfare programs to provide everything from housing, food, and medical care for children. So, abortions should be illegal only in cases to save the life of the mother. Right?

*eye roll* Sure dude. Sure. Yes, back to that point: Trump is old, meanwhile, Biden is STILL president and has his wife running cabinet meetings... You folks don't get to be taken seriously while you ignore that Biden is still the President and the greatest political scandal of our lives is happening right now as Harris and everyone else just pretends he isn't fit for office anymore.

People are like moths drawn to the flame on this stuff. The only thought going through your brain at that moment should be to get to safety. I watch those old videos of people before Tsuanmmis in wonderment about the waters receding... and then dying as the waves crash in on them. Or folks watching flooding waters rise up a bank and then sweeping them away. GET. TO. SAFETY.

To this day, still one of the dumbest arguments you folks try to push.

What are you talking about? This is not money laundering. If that were the plan, he wouldn't need to launch a scheme like this to launder money anyhow.

Where is this lie? Again, this is your argument. Make it.

What have I ignored? I just answered this. People are free to make their own choices. Quote the scriptures or not, I am not wasting my time with your video. Nope. He isn't doing that. You have yet to present any argument to back this up. Where is this happening?

Yeah... Candidates walk around people as they are campaigning. I never said anything about iron clad security. In fact, if you bothered to be honest enough to actually respond directly to what I said, I pointed out you were the one absurding bringing up this "100%" nonsense. Other Presidents and candidates walk around people in crowds... if the SS and local LEO is not doing their job, then it isn' the candidates fault if they get shot.

Pointing out facts is not an excuse. The Trump economy was great until a global Pandemic hit. Yes, of course it works that way. You want to ignore reality and be dishonest.

Too?

Good riddance!

What the hell does this have to do with anything? No... you are pushing the lie that this was Trumps... it was the Pandemic. Even more dishonestly, you both fault Trump for a Pandemic and then praise Biden for the recovery from the bottom of that market during the Pandemic. Its just a big lie.

I am not the one moving goal posts here... I am just questioning whatever lame position you put up. I did not accept anything, I am challenging your position, getting to the depravity behind it.

Sigh... I swear, why you folks play this dumb game. Yes, you were clearly arguing about paying for him to have protection: "Why should American taxpayers foot the bill for his campaign rally’s and golf excursions? " And yes, they clearly failed to protect him. The fact that a bullet grazed his hear is not a testament to the SS being great, it is just dumb luck that Trump moved his head at the last moment. The shooter was not stopped. The shooter was able to get into a firing position and take a shot that hit the President. You just are not a serious person interested in any kind of honest discussion when you say garbage like this. We were not quibbling about 100% protection. I worked in private security for a living, including executive protection. There is no such thing as 100% protection; there is only risk mitigation analysis. We were not quibbling about 100% protection.

I am not following you here... so, you are giving me an example for how they provided more security when you have been arguing the opposite?

Well, it helps show my stated position here before you asked. It is very helpful. You asked me a question, I answered it directly and gave some supporting evidence. I can't even get you to own up to your own silliness in presenting a cumulative chart and complaining about why it didn't go down... ROFL

The flu does not kill millions of people a year. What is your point? Yes, there was the flu and thousands still died. The flu did not take a year off. Golly gee... what was everyone doing when COVID came along? Oh yeah, they were wearing masks, social distancing, lock downs, closures... hmmm... oh boy, this is a tough one to think of as to why the flu would have been a lot less impactful during this timeframe. Yes. I had a good friend I know die from COVID. I went to his funeral. I have friends who had family members die and who were severely hospitalized. So... what is your point with all this? Are you claiming the whole thing was made up?

Yes. I have commented on this here as well. It is a cumulative chart... it doesn't go down. It only goes up. You made a silly comment about it going down... that is all. Its really easy to admit that and move on.