Jump to content

User

Senior Member
  • Posts

    15,160
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    51

Everything posted by User

  1. You tell me, you ignored almost everything I said and still won't give me a straight answer.
  2. This doesn't answer the question... so you want to take their SS protection too? You were the one presenting this as a why are we paying for this only in regards to Trump. Make up your mind, you just got done complaining about why we were paying, now you say he needs a bigger detail. Pointing out how Trump responded AFTER the failings of security to stop the threat before he got a shot off is not Trumps fault for the failings BEFORE.
  3. Yes, the figures are published... and you are here pushing this lie.
  4. You are just going to keep pushing the same lie over and over and over again and run away from when it is called out.
  5. No, you didn't answer... but who determines if someone has no choice? Every one of your arguments is just wish-washy, depraved nonsense.
  6. No, it is my argument that there is no "intent" to see Trump harmed by decisions on security coverage. There was no known threat that some guy was going to scale the roof and try to shoot him that day... Intent is a mindset you have to prove, you are just assuming it. That is not how criminal law or good argument works. You have to prove the intent. You have not done that at all. It is an awful argument you are making here and clearly a biased one that you only apply in this circumstance to make this bogus argument.
  7. Note, you did not say you want to stop the injustices... I have no doubt many folks like you know it is an injustice, you just don't care because you have another agenda. "Gender affirming" So which is it, you just got done saying you understood that men pretending to be women were not in fact women, but now you are saying it is "affirming" of their gender. "pre-transition" What are they transitioning into here exactly? Seems an awful lot like you are back to saying men can be women. "cis-gender" So... if you understand men can't be women, why are you using this language? Oh... so you do want to force women and girls to have to compete against men. I am not the one hiding from Hodad. Hodad is hiding from me. Like a coward.
  8. Oh... no, its not. Decisions are made every day to weaken or strengthen security based on risk and costs and resources. We are talking about the nature of your bad argument. Large numbers are used to demonstrate that.
  9. Yet again... the dishonesty here is the pandemic. Neither Biden created jobs or Trump lost them... A pandemic happened that jobs were lost during and then recovered from. Why would we think this? That isn't what happened before and that certainly is not what Trump has planned for his next term.
  10. You tell us. What exactly is your argument here?
  11. This is such a loaded question. The Bible doesn't say PI isn't 3.14... nor does it prescribe what PI is. The Bible was not providing some mathematical proof with drawings and calculations at all. You are talking about where a description is given of how a cylindrical container was built. You are making some presumptions here to skew what is being done here. It is not a math problem, it is a laymen description of something being built. No where are they saying it was precisely X diameter and precisely Y circumference and that this thus proves PI = 3. Its like me telling some friends about a project I had in my garage. Telling them I built wooden circle and it was 30 feet around and 10 foot in diameter... you come along and say that I am trying to tell people PI = 3... or maybe in lay talk people give approximate figures when speaking, I didn't explain that it was really 30 feet 10 5/16th inches around and 9 feet 11 15/16th inches around measured with exact precision with my micrometer! (just throwing out numbers here to demonstrate the absurdity of this) This whole line of argument is just done by someone so pathetically desperate to come up with something to criticize The Bible over.
  12. Oh, this dumb game... so you think Biden should lose all his SS coverage when he goes home on vacation? to the Beach? When Harris is out campaigning, should she lose all her SS coverage?
  13. This is absurd... ANY decision made in protection *could cause* a failure... literally EVERY decision made is one based on risk vs cost. Why didn't they surround Trump with 1 Million men?! OMG, if they decided only to use 900,000, they knew that could reduce his security and lead to an assassination!!!! *GASP* Your argument is absurd nonsense.
  14. Like, do you not even care about how dishonest this is? I mean, maybe this crap works on your uninformed liberal pals at the cocktail parties... but you are talking to someone who follows politics pretty closely and is well-informed. The Dow significantly increased while Trump was President until the Pandemic. You are trying to play this dishonest game two ways: -Blame Trump for a Pandemic -Give Biden credit for the recovery from the bottom of the market during a Pandemic. Its as dumb and dishonest as Biden bragging about how many jobs he created, when it was nothing more than the economy returning to normal after the Pandemic. This is not ignorance, it is just an outright lie. Yet again, you take away the Pandemic years and Biden is spending more in deficit now than Trump ever did. Illegal immigration has been at record numbers under Biden and they don't care, Biden issued a ton of Executive orders to make things worse at the border than when Trump was President. Continue what? This surface level deep BS and lies?
  15. I have not pushed any argument to compel anyone to take the COVID vaccine. Goddess has continually pushed conspiratorial arguments to question if there was even a pandemic or that COVID was killing people. In this instance, absurdly failing to realize the chart posted was a cumulative chart. You don't have to think that the COVID vaccine should be mandatory to acknowledge that COVID did in fact kill people. A lot of people.
  16. Surprise! You never heard about this one because it was just a bunch of black kids beating up a white kid. Just a local news story... Parents react to alleged altercation on Jackson County school bus https://www.wxxv25.com/parents-react-to-alleged-altercation-on-jackson-county-school-bus/ "On Tuesday night WXXV received a video from a St Martin Middle School parent which allegedly shows multiple children kicking and punching another child on a school bus. We will not be showing that video on WXXV but according to that parent the bus allegedly belongs to St Martin Middle School and happened on school grounds." Don't worry, I got the video here for you:
  17. These folks will come up with any convoluted argument they can to justify their absurd positions that men can be women.
  18. "knowingly cause" The SS did not "knowingly" cause any of this either. Incompetence is incompetence. And yes, by your same bad argument here, Trump was incompetent in his response to what unfolded on J6 as well as his claims regarding the election. Yes... leadership in the SS makes decisions every day regarding what amount of protection is reasonable, warranted, or how they will deploy resources and they are not causing assassination attempts nor are they expecting them because of their actions.
  19. Being run like a business means: -Only spending what you have or are capable of creating value to borrow for -Doing things efficiently -Doing things effectively -Doing things to create value for people A business answers to their customers. If the only thing a business cares about is their owners, they won't be in business for long.
  20. Sigh... sure, lets pretend like Trump was not already President and none of this happened then.
  21. No, that is nowhere near the meaning of intent at all. If this is the kind of bad argument you are making, then you also agree Trump intended for January 6th to happen.
  22. Um... no. Drunk driving is an awful, preventable tragedy that the drunk driver is 100% at fault for... but that doesn't mean someone got drunk and drove home intending to kill a family in a minivan.
  23. All of that long response and you didn't answer the question...
  24. Well, this was not your original position... but are you now saying parents should be able to kill their 5 year old child for the same reasons?
  25. No, programing can be complex with lots of functions. We don't have to presume that the one piece of binary code you are talking about is somehow a lynch pin of the entire program... just as I pointed out that someone being intersex doesn't mean the entire body's functions change. Oh yes, the classic liberal game. You guys push this shit on society, and then when folks like me respond... THAT is the issue. It is really a tiresome dishonest game. No, it is a deformation. Sex is still binary. Intersex is not a new classification of sex.
×
×
  • Create New...