User

Clear him - from what? Just a moment ago you were on here pushing that Goode was innocent until proven guilty and now you are presuming this officer is guilty and must be cleared. What protocol? You keep making these kinds of assertions in multiple threads and run whenever I ask you to back them up. I have watched all the videos. I have given you the facts. You can't engage in a fact-based discussion because you lose.

Where is that defined as their task? They are literally the government, falling under the Executive branch.

On. Video.

So... once again: What kind of investigation do you want? As I said before, what you are describing here, but just don't have the balls to say it outright, is that you think the guy was wrong and should be criminally prosecuted for it. The facts do not support you. So you hide behind perception or what you think the public wants.

Define what investigation you want. If you have to wait until after the midterms, all you want is to engage in political lawfare. Once again, you can't argue the facts, all you can do is play these stupid games about perception.

Yeah... which is why I asked what kind of investigation you were wanting. This shooting was "investigated." What you want is a criminal investigation to drag this guy through the mud and to see him on trial. The facts do not support that.

White House Tours: https://www.whitehouse.gov/visit/ Do you enjoy being as stupid as you are?

Sometimes... I really do wonder if some of the folks on here are living in a mental institute somewhere, and this is the bit of free time they get on the internet. https://www.google.com/maps/@25.4430677,-88.2609979,6.25z?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDQxNS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

What SOP? What kind of investigation? Not every police use of force is criminally investigated. Most are not... because they were not criminal actions nor any reasonable evidence to proceed on. When we have it on video that someone was obstructing, resisting, evading, and driving a vehicle right into and at an Officer...

You seem quite ignorant of the US military. No one was forced to do anything. We have an all-volunteer military at the moment. It is still an international waterway. Yes, I am aware of the absurd article claims by an anonymous source, with no other corroborating evidence, that are being refuted by countless people on the record as BS. The point being, you were full of shit saying he was MIA when he is not.

1. Irrelevant. Also, minutes before, she had her vehicle parked much farther out in the middle of the road. That is obstruction. It is illegal. This is the game "protestors" play where they obstruct, then run, then obstruct, then run... to delay ICE from enforcing the law. 2. So what? It is not lawful to "protest" by blocking the road, interfering and obstructing Federal LEO from doing their job, and then fleeing and evading arrest. 3. There is nothing funny with accelerating a vehicle towards someone. That is deadly force. 4. She was killed because she obstructed, resisted, ran from arrest, and in doing so threatened deadly force against an Officer. It is on video that he was in fact hit. You are conflating the innocent-until-proven-guilty standard in a court with an online discussion, where we can both see what happened and make statements of fact about it.

Nothing has been determined? Yet you are on here proclaiming there will be a day of reckoning over it... We have enough facts we can see with our own two eyes to make the factual statements I did. Maybe mothers should stay home with their kids instead of out obstructing ICE and refusing arrest.

MIA... since when? Why do you insist on mindlessly parroting whatever leftist BS you are fed? No, the threat that Iran holds over it... that you and others are pretending like only happened with Trump.

Just like it isn't you that is living your life in a bomb shelter every other day that Iran proxies are firing missiles randomly at you. Just like it isn't you who was at a music concert as Hamas terrorists backed by Iran flew over in paragliders to gun your friends down and then you as well...

Once again, if folks want to dress up like women in their homes, wander the streets, whatever... but when they and people like you start demanding we all play along, that is not a matter of opinion, it is a matter of policy you are pushing and I am rejecting. No, mental health care. A lot more women are hurt when you push this shit on them. Yet, that is exactly what you are telling women. Official government ID is used for IDENTITY purposes. Not for what you think you are, but what you actually are.

You can't argue the facts, so you push your wish-casting on public opinion. Goode obstructed ICE, ignored orders, evaded arrest, and endangered the life of an ICE officer with a deadly weapon. She was shot in self-defense as she struck an Officer with her car. It was on video from multiple sources and angles.

Yes, in response to what Democrats did. You don't like it? You should not have cheered it on for the last 4 years.

I did not ask anyone to change their "orientation." We are talking about the cosplay they are engaged in.

Not really. ICE operations go mostly unnoticed and routine all day long all over the country. It's when you clowns show up and break the law, forcing them to use force, which is exactly what you are hoping for. You are sick people, encouraging others to go out and sacrifice themselves with their stupidity, all for the cause.

There is no such thing as a "birth gender." We are putting women in danger, making them uncomfortable, and exposing them to men with perverted fetish mental delusions by demanding they accept these men into their spaces. Stop dressing like a woman and pretending to look like one, and use the men's restroom.

No. What looks bad is when leftists then take over the street acting like raging lunatics obstructing and attacking them.

Such a dishonest person you are. You spend your time mocking faith, deriding Christian prayer, as if you don’t understand either, and now you only try to weaponize Christian faith to throw it in someone’s face when you don’t believe any of it.

Not my fault you can’t comprehend the answer and ignored my own question. The fact that someone could dress up and pretend to be something they are not doesn't then mean they should get to go into the places they otherwise would not and should not be accepted in. If I dress up as the King of England, should the guards let me wander around Buckingham Palace? Women use the women’s restroom and men use the men’s. That is actual real women and real men respectively, not that you can dress up and pretend to be something you are not.

Any other vague, trite, meaningless, and irrelevant comments? The fact that someone could dress up and pretend to be something they are not doesn't then mean they should get to go into the places they otherwise would not and should not be accepted in. If I dress up as the King of England, should the guards let me wander around Buckingham Palace? Yes, it is a reality that dudes have mental issues and/or a fetish to want to be something they are not. Doesn't mean society has to play along with their delusions and sacrifice children to you, sick, evil people pushing this madness on them, or stealing the places of women in competition.

The first of many what? Once again, you are too lazy to read the story or too ignorant to understand it. How are you people this stupid?