User

Well, that is certainly what you are defending being forced onto little girls and women in their private spaces.

So, lets review... ignoring all this: [Ad hominem] [Patronizing framing] [Poisoning the well] [Guilt by association] [Tribal signaling] [Unsupported assertion] [Begging the question] [Ad hominem] [Dismissive characterization] [Mind-reading] [Attribution of motive] [Appeal to political identity] [Personal insult] [Bare assertion] [Ad hominem] [Psychologizing opponent] [Straw man] [Mind-reading] [Unsupported accusation of lying] [Appeal to group identity] [Condescension] [Moralizing] [Patronizing conclusion] If you want to go back to your original assertion, about the only thing of substance here, that Canada did not adequately warn of the risks, that is your job to prove: What risk? <-Define the risk When did officials know? <- You say they should have done more, so... what did they know before and what evidence do you have? What did they say publicly at the time? <- What was it they said you think is proof of them downplaying the risk (and remember, you must define that risk) What should they have said instead?

Once again, this is the classic leftist bullshit pushed by the folks pushing this madness. I am no more obsessed with this than it takes for me to respond to what is being pushed.

Maybe we talked about Measles sometime earlier... but the discussion was on Polio before. The gist of your bad argument is still the same though. This is a neat trick you anti-vaxxers love to play. Notice, you are using the death rate chart. Yeah, scienctists tend to agree that improved sanitation, hygene, and medical care advancements all contributed to a decrease in DEATHS. You are conflating a reduction in DEATHS to a reduction in the disease. You see, this is the chart showing measles reductions with the introduction of the vaccine and the recommended booster: Is this where I infer you are blind? That you are an irrational person who can't be reasoned with? ROFL

See, you are still lying. It is clearly more than a fad.

Of course you do not care to address my responses. Its the same thing you do over and over again here. You push the surface-level deep anti-vax nonsense, then when you get called out, you got nothing. Just more baseless assertions. You are conflating disagreement with irrationality. I clearly responded to your points and just like now, you never responded. Here is me, calling you out for not responding to the last comment on this subject... which you ignored: More pettiness because you do not have any substance. LOL, I know so little and yet you are the one blaming the blood clots on the mRNA vaccines.

Once again you are a liar. A cowardly, sad, pathetic little liar.

These are statements of fact being discussed here. What does perspective or nuance have to do with anything? IF... Also, hindsight is 20/20; if they did not know of a particular risk or concern, they can't address it adequately before they know about it. Besides, the argument being made here is about discussing risk at all, generally speaking, which the government, media, and health care professionals and organizations did discuss. That is a subjective feeling... What, like a handful of them? This was already rare, and even more rare that those who did get it had a severe case. And once those risks were known... they were discussed and reported on. Define "much higher" Yes, COVID proved to be more risky than a flu vaccine, but comparing it only specifically to the Flu Vaccine was hardly the standard disclosed risk. None of the links I shared described the risk like that. It was compared in general safety terms with other vaccines, which proved largely true. The blood clotting issues were with the non-mRNA vaccines... There were no well-known issues with the mRNA vaccines that would cause severe problems. How can they warn about blood clotting if they don't know? Once they did, that risk was evaluated... and they responded. Huh? Where are you getting this from? Common sense tells you that any vaccine doesn't just 100% stay in the injection site. This appears to be another one of your silly anti-vax talking points. You're skipping the most important step. Finding a small amount of a substance in an organ does not automatically mean that organ is being damaged. The question isn't whether vaccine components could be detected outside the arm. The question is whether they caused meaningful harm. If ovaries were being damaged, where are the fertility effects? If testicles were being damaged, where are the fertility effects? If hearts were being broadly damaged, why was the primary confirmed cardiac risk myocarditis at a rate measured in tens per million rather than millions? You're treating "detected somewhere" as proof of "caused major harm." Those are two completely different claims. Once again, I did not and do not support mandates on being vaccinated with the COVID vaccine.... Also, nothing is ever 100% safe. No medical procedure or routine is 100% safe. Hell, going to your own family doctor for a routine checkup is not 100% safe.

You are full of shit as always and too big a coward to face me. Couy Griffin He did little more than stand outside. He was prosecuted for trespassing because the grounds were "protected" because the Vice President was there. Then you leftists engaged in more lawfare and had him removed from his local office because he was part of an insurrection. For doing nothing more than being outside standing there. No violence. No vandalism. No attacking LEO. Just standing there. This is the kind of lawfare you people engaged in/ You are full of shit as always and too big a coward to face me. Couy Griffin He did little more than stand outside. He was prosecuted for trespassing because the grounds were "protected" because the Vice President was there. Then you leftists engaged in more lawfare and had him removed from his local office because he was part of an insurrection. For doing nothing more than being outside, standing there. No violence. No vandalism. No attacking LEO. Just standing there. This is the kind of lawfare you people engaged in/ You are full of shit as always and too big a coward to face me. Couy Griffin He did little more than stand outside. He was prosecuted for trespassing because the grounds were "protected" because the Vice President was there. Then you leftists engaged in more lawfare and had him removed from his local office because he was part of an insurrection. For doing nothing more than being outside, standing there. No violence. No vandalism. No attacking LEO. Just standing there. This is the kind of lawfare you people engaged in/

Not just the maximum penalty, but a vindictive prosecution that overreached to the point the Supreme Court had to intervene on some charges. I follow a lawyer who was a former federal prosecutor who represented some J6 folks for free (because very few would help them) and he documented the abuse they went through and how the DC courts were so skewed against them.

You know what else they have in Poland? Underground gas storage. Keep running, coward.

This is an outright lie. I mean, this is what you do here. You lie and hide like a coward from being called out for your lies. People were prosecuted, vindictively so, for doing little more than wandering around and leaving. They were not "occupying" the Capitol. The government went after folks outside, too.

That is not what you want more of and support I was talking about....

I get you think this was a clever smart ass response... but it really isn't. Yeah, the problem is that you are a fan of more.

It doesn't have to be activist support, what you are doing intentionally or not to support the trans madness, was downplaying this.

You can both think that what someone does in their own bedroom is morally wrong, while also not believing it is the business of government or others to know what they are doing or be involved in what they are doing - e.g., you don't care. This is called tolerance, not acceptance.

Man, you guys are simply mental patients at this point with how much Trump has broken your brains.

You just keep pushing this lie, you little cowardly weasel.

What does this mean? Does that mean forcing girls in High School to compete with a boy and get destroyed? Losing their place on the podium? Do women have to live with sharing their personal spaces with men who think they are women? Do we need to "live and let live" a child into transitioning without their parents being told or telling them if they do not approve their child will die and sending them off to get butchered?

No, you need probability. You are presuming that to make your point here, when we simply do not know. We have a sample size of one of one.

You are such an insufferable clown. Apparently, the vast majority did not catch on to your alleged BS, because they did in fact peacefully march and leave. No, the pardons were there because Biden politicized the pursuit of folks with vindictive prosecutions. The majority deserved pardons.

Neither did your crying about downvotes, you cowardly clown.

LOL, more dishonesty. It is not just a social fad when the leftists have institutionalized it into the legal framework, rules, policies, wherever they can. Those things do not just go away like a fad. They have to be systematically rooted out and destroyed.

That might be your strawman.... "working" to what end? Again, all it did was pause the clock for 10 years with Obama sending them plane loads of cash. Literally. Then what?

Reminder of what a cowardly, lying, POS @BeaverFever is: