gatomontes99

Yeah, no yeah...we see it User's way. You are not participating in reality

You really need to stop using that phrase you are using it wrong. These downward revisions are on top of the previous downward revisions. So it's 2M plus all the previous downward revisions.

Over 10K posts tie Charlie Kirk’s murder to Israel as conspiracy theories explode online: ADL report Some of you fell for these social media posts that CK was killed by Israel. Turns out, it was Iranian misinformation...fake news. AP via Yahoo com "Pro-Iranian groups took a different tack, claiming Israel was behind Kirk's death and that the suspect was set up to take the fall."

Winning! https://www.opb.org/article/2025/09/13/charlie-kirk-critics-are-being-targeted-online-and-losing-jobs/ https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-kirk-death-social-media-posts-2129536 https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/09/13/people-lose-jobs-posts-charlie-kirk-assassination/86109191007/ Society is rejecting the hatred that defines the left. They've lost the social wars and are being shunned. It is about freaking time.

Liberals don't understand nuance. Can you be walking down a street and become a victim of domestic violence? No. Domestic violence is, by definition, violence that happens at home in a family setting. Yes, it is bad. But does it really factor into what the police do? Should it factor into your decision to move there?

All of it. I don't live in lefty looney land. You use all these code words and phrases and act like we should all understand it. I guarantee you 75% here have no idea what in the world you are talking about. They are either ignoring your gibberish or poking you to see what gibberish will come out. I am trying to understand it so we can have a conversation. But, if you don't want to (or can't) expand upon your thesis/premise than so be it.

Everything I quoted. No one can read that and discern what your thesis is. What are you saying?

The fact that he bought into this fantasy land where Charlie Kirk hated people.

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/09/16/us/text-message-tyler-robinson-roomate-vis The text messages prove that this was a politically motivated assasination, that he was left wing and that he was dating his roommate.

1M, 800k and 300k jobs were never created in 24, 23 and 22, but Joe Biden reported that they were.

Is there anyway you can make this into a coherent argument that is defendable?

I can see your points. But the king does have a certain power over knights. Maybe that isn't quite the perfect example. The problem with drawing the line on something subjective is that it is subjective. The Brandenburg v Ohio case was well adjudicated because it gave a well defined line.

That is possibly not covered on free speech. Brandenburg v Ohio basically said that because the head of the KKK there called black people all kinds of names and claimed they were destroying society and all this other rascist crap but didn't explicitly or implicity say to go harm them, that it was free speech. Even though people did commit acts of violence, maybe as a result of his speech, he wasn't responsible. Now, had he explicitly called for killings or directed people to do it, then it wasn't free speech. If your example could show that the speech was intended to justify violence, then it would not be free speech.

Our SCOTUS has said that free speech ends when you call for violence. So, calling conservatives fascists and nazis is free speech unless they expressly or strongly imply violence. I agree with SCOTUS.

You are not relevant, until you accept reality.

The both sides argument needs to end. If you can find an example of someone on the right committing unprovoked violence or assasinating an individual, you will never find hoards of the right celebrating. But that is exactly what happened with Trump, the UHC CEO, Kirk and others. The left is obsessed with violence and using violence to silence and suppress dissent.

You make a great point. We should let China use Uyghurs as slaves so they'll buy soy beans and we can buy poorly made, Guicci knock off hamdbags on Temu for $10. What is a Uyghurs any way? They arent really humans, right? Just let them be slaves. You tell him. You are twice the ass h he is!

I heard hints of this in the days after Kirk passed. This is the wrong reaction. Speech is speech. It does not matter what the adjective is. We cannot become Britain and start imprisoning people for words. If we do that than we are no different than the left.

Totally

Bullshit. They didn't show up at those rallies with concrete milkshakes, gas masks, trash can lids, tire irons and other home made weapons to march peacefully. They went there to be violent.

The difference is Republicans aren't using NGO's to subvert the sovereignty of the US.

I am for all this. ANTIFA is a terror group. Don't believe me? Has ANTIFA done this? Acts of dangerous to human life that violate the laws: Intimidate or coerce civilians? Affect the conduct of the government by mass destruction: My question would be, in what way are they not a terror organization? They use violence to intimidate people and disrupt the government in pursuit of a political goal. This should be a slam dunk.