gatomontes99

It was both sides of the debate over statues. He did, explicitly say that neo nazis were not included. No, Trump Did Not Call Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists 'Very Fine People' But Trump was wrong. There are no fine people on the left any more.

“Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?"

Same guy? The guy in purple failed a run for city council and was a member of the DSA.

You are just going right down my rules, in order.

You didn't address the context. You just attacked Charlie and you abandoned your own premise. He is saying she, by her own actions, is unqualified and that she is admitting it. By the way, a degree does not equal qualified. Qualification is a state of ability, not a degree on a resume.

Is there any answer you would believe? You've clearly ignored the truth and ignored my request. I asked you to post an entire quote, in context. You left out the context. Most likely on purpose. Don't try to play the moral high ground card when you are wallowing in the mud.

Spin it any way you like. You know you lied.

Laedership and Loyalty on full display:

And, in context: He was talking about women that were appointed to positions because of their skin color and not because of their ability. You quoted this so far out of context to make it sound as if he was expressly stating black women are all stupid. That wasn't the statement at all. The statement was how a racist policy gave them privileges they didn't earn.

I don't know everything he ever said, but I do know how he thinks. So, since you are so sure you can, do it. Find an exa.ple that explicitly says what you claim he says. It has to be a direct quote, in full context. Not a one off that is out.of context.or interpreted by some hack.

You can not post the in context version of those stances without disproving yourself.

Disgusting

Lmao...this story was so faked. The entire thing is amateurish and filled with unbelievable claims.

There was one that was stage left, with a quartering view that included the line of students that were selected to ask the questions, the mic they would use and Charlie. The guy asking the question was handy blonde (I think), wearing a Grey t-shirt that was unlucky, he was white. But his shock was pure. There was a clear startled jump and shake. He didn't know it was coming. Not in my opinion. I heard a report that he had been cleared as well. ***it merged on me*** ***seperate thought*** There is a rumor going around that the shooter is Skye Valadaz. She is a FTM trans. She is not the shooter. Internet Colombos think they have the right person. But the chins are vastly different. She has a butt chin and the shooter has a pointed chin.

It was on X. It may be gone now. It is haunting.

Want to play a fun game? Why don't you list all the right wing, false flag events in the last decade? I'll start. Jessie Smolet. Oops, he was left wing.

Democrats through the constitution out the window when they burned down cities, killed CEOs, violently attempted to kick Jews out of universities, attacked ICE, tried to kill a SCOTUS judge, tried to kill Republicans playing baseball, tried to assasinate Trump, tried to make up crimes to prosecute Trump, allowed China to send fake IDs to use in voter fraud, allowed illegal aliens to vote, killed Charlie and the thousands upon thousands of violent acts that go unpublished every year. And it is one sided. Some try to bring up Gifford and the MN reps, but both those shooters were nut jobs, one even thought he was helping Tampon Tim run for senate. The violence is one sided. Left wing speakers and comics stand in front of their groups every day with minimal security if any at all. But conservatives have to have significant security and even then, they risk being killed. Look at all the pics of Charlie. He and his wife never put pics of their children facing the camera. Why? Because the left is nucking futs. But, I would not do extra constitutional acts to get it under control. I would, and most people that think like me would support, prosecuting threats and acts aggressively. That means finding every rioters at every "protest" and putting them on trial and putting everyone, that is guilty, in jail for the maximum allowed by law.

The face of evil.

Crowder has a screen shot from the ATF that says the rifle was a 30.06, bolt action, top loading Mauser. The bullets had ANTIFA and trans messages on them.

Because they are future voters and the Democrats hope to have a majority in that demographic.

Give us one reason to not do that? The so called "Democratic" party brazenly committed acts of a Banana Republic, propped up a senile old man as leader of the free world, spied on an in coming president, impeached him based on evidence they paid to have created out of thin air, tried to assasinate him...twice, and so many other atrocities. Obviously, we won't. But the left has to get their shìt together. Start acting like normal people. Stop being so damned racist. Stop exploiting the poor for votes. Stop grooming children. Stop normalizing mental illness. Stop supporting genocide. Loughlin was a paranoid schizophrenic. His obsession with Giffords had more to do with her visibility and his illness than anything. Had she been a Republican, the outcome would have been the same. The Boelter motivations are unknown. I would not be surprised if he had right leaning, political motivations. That doesn't make what he did right (far from it), but he isn't a trend either.

Let me say, I think the guy that asked the question was just there at the wrong time. I don't suggest you watch the video. I did and the guy that was asking the question looked shocked and horrified. So much so, I am relatively confident he had nothing to do with it.

1 thing: mental health issues.

No. He would have got the death penalty. But what does he have in common with the two Trump shooters, the trans mass shooters a few weeks back, the Senate baseball team shooter and the Charlotte subway guy?