gatomontes99

I like how the left says she's unqualified and then tells us how she magically got a worthless, weak case past a liberal (likely) grand jury. Well? Which is it? Stupid attorney or evil genius?

RIFs have begun. BEST SHUTDOWN EVER¡!!!!!!!!¡

And another fine example of rhetoric that is designed to get us killed. Why are you guys so obsessed with getting us killed?

What did Obama say about executive orders? Something like I have a pen and a blackberry, I don't need congress. Or, what is actually going on like prosecuting those that abused their power. Oh, so you support the south's racist belief that state's rights supersede personal rights? What ICE is doing is protecting the rights of the people of these states by eliminating as much crime as possible. The fact that you don't like that speaks volumes. Lmao, you are just making shìt up now, aren't you? Trump is the only president in modern history who lost net worth while in office. Stop believing this lie that he's some how taking money from the federal government. He is literally building a grand ballroom for the WhiteHouse using his own money while refusing the salary of the President. All just made up bullshìt. Come at me with something tangible, not this fantasy laden drivel.

I am talking about the office led by Spencer B. Merriweather III. They allowed Decarlos Brown Jr. To go free 14 times before he killed. I am sure Spencer B. Merriweather III is immenently qualified. But his qualifications aside, he sucks at his job. So, maybe we need to rethink what qualified actually means. In this case, it means getting results. While you don't like the results, the results are effective. A grand jury in an area of Virginia that is deeply blue saw enough evidence to determine James should stand trial, despite the fact that many in that state would view her as a hero. Don't start nothing, wont be nothing. You guys had to go around with your banana republic style persecutions. It made us believe that the only way to stop that is for you to have real, material consequences for your shitty behavior. And that is exactly what is happening. If you hadn't behaved like little biotches, we wouldn't be doing this. You should understand that my support for Trump is not idolization of Trump. My support for him is 95% anti-you. Aka anti-left.

But, you proved my point. Since you agreed the government wasn't involved, then investigating government officials wasn't necessary. So, now look at the timing. Nov 15, 2023 - Trump announces his intent to run Nov 18, 2023 - Jack Smith is appointed special council to investigate stolen documents April 13, 2024 - Jack Smith decides to spy on nearly a dozen senators Why would the phone calls of senators three years after J6 matter to an investigation that was supposed to be about documents Trump had? Because they weren't investigating a crime, they were investigating the man, looking for a crime.

Was the prosecuter in Charlotte NC qualified? Because that person let a dangerous criminal with mental problems out of jail almost 20 times. Then he killed a women just because she was white. So maybe qualified needs to be redefined.

There was no deadly insurrection. There was a riot that lead to an unarmed female rioter getting shot. But there was zero evidence that suggested any government organizational efforts behind the riot.

New York AG Letitia James indicted in Virginia after investigation by Trump's DOJ Virginia has indicted Letitia James for lying on her real-estate paperwork. She claimed the home was her permanent residence when it was not. Didn't Adam Schitforbrains do the same thing?

And you are trying to get conservatives killed by using rhetoric that you know incites violence and assassinations.

Please don't post pictures form a certain posters timeliness. lol

You are clearly trying to justify his murder by creating a narrative that his debate tactics were invalid. As for the video, I'm not buying what the tranny is saying. He is taking elements of the speech and redefining them with the clear goal of distorting the argument. The argument was that a typical passenger will question whether a pilot is qualified because of their minority status. They would do that because the airline expressly stated they would use minority status as a qualification rather than actual qualifications. The use of an example (like Harvard) solidifies that there are situations in which minority hiring replaced qualified hiring with disastrous consequences. Also, the tranny claimed hiring isn't a zero sum game, but it literally is. They don't hire an infinite number of employees. Hiring based on discriminatory practices is widely considered inappropriate. In addition, the tranny claimed Charlie made up a scenario. Since Charlie was speculating about whether the pilot was fully qualified and discussing what a hypothetical passenger might think, an example with extreme incompetence is not an unfair or inaccurate assumption. As for the claim that an instructor would lose his/her license for passing a poor pilot is 1000% false. First, instructors don't test pilots. The FAA and their designees check pilots. Designees don't have a "license"threy can lose. They have a Letter of Authorization to test on behalf of the FAA. Unless their actions are grotesquely inappropriate, the worst that can happen is that they will lose their LOA. As for their checkrides, they use a set of criteria that are published by the FAA, but are somewhat subjective. Meaning, some designees (aka check airmen) can be harder on their pilots and some can be far more foregiving. Further, every airline has their own training program and grading system with subjective standards. Their scenarios are created by the airline's training department, using FAA guidelines that score activities. Each scenario must reach a minimal level. However, the scenarios are well known by the pilots, so they can over perform by knowing what is coming. In short, the video is full of fallacies disguised as informed criticism. As someone that is intensely familiar with airline training and the varying levels of competence among pilots, I don't have major issue with what Charlie Kirk said. The true problem is not whether or not the pilots are qualified. The true problem, as highlighted by Kirk, is that the populous will view minorities through a hyper critical lense. DEI is a disservice to minorities that have earned their positions. They are good. They are qualified. Yet, people speculate because they don't know if DEI gave them an advantage.

You are comparing people that want a smaller government whose laws are obeyed to a guy that killed 6 million people and you don't think that is exaggerated?

Let us see if this one holds. I am a little hopeful since Egypt is more involved and more invested than before.

No, fùck you aṣṣhole. You are using encindiary language that you KNOW leads to people dying and you do it any way. You clearly won't be happy until your enemies are dead.

You can find 1000 videos like that. All the south side, black people telling the 5% approval rating Mayor to get the fùck out of the way.

You guys, especially you @robosmith, need to stop it with the exaggerated rhetoric. You are literally causing people to kill Americans. Of course he's was a LWNJ: He hated the Catholic Church, Jews, the SCOTUS and ICE. All the enemies de jure in the LWNJ play book.

@robosmith won't be happy until he sees us all dead.

I like how he makes excuses for the blatant sexism. It is so typically them.

Delaying a vote to verify all votes were properly tabulated is against the law? I don't think so.

Nailed it!

My friend married a Russian. Maybe he should be surveillance as well.

Peaceful? Are you nucking futs?

Charlie Kirk was killed because this type of attitude has become increasingly popular on the left: Dem AG Nominee Jay Jones Fantasized About Shooting Former Virginia GOP Speaker: ‘He Receives Both Bullets’ If you think that is a lie, here is the commentary on his pathetic attempt at an appology: Va. attorney general nominee apologizes for violent text messages about former GOP House Speaker But they aren't just pushing violence on Conservarives, they are also making increasingly sexist attacks as well: Pritzker, of course, is saying that pretty girls can't possibly be qualified to lead. This is not surprising from the party that pushes men in girls sports. No Democrat has asked Jay Jones to withdraw from the race or condemned Pritzker for his extremely sexist comments. No, they support these two men.