gatomontes99

Funny how the doctors and scientists we believe aren't playing politics. I notice you couldn't refute the data so you attacked me. Care to address the data or are you just interested in letting your emotions rule?

Any country with government run healthcare has eliminated the right to live and should be considered a major violators of human rights.

There are literally 40 doctors cited in the preface as witnesses to the committee. Why do you lie when you are so easily debunked?

Those 25% tariffs really hur the US, huh?

Tha know you for conceding my point. That was big of you.

No it didn't. The accuracy of geofencing is so high that they can literally arrest someone for robbing a bank based on it.

It is man made It did come from WIV And this is how the press treated the truth: Who was right all along? DJT.

Lmao...chat gpt? You understand that it is just a set of programmed responses introduced through internet searches. It isn't AI. It's just a complicated set of preprogrammed responses.

But it was good enough to convict people at the J6 protest? Come on man. Either it is good data or it isn't.

Why do you lie when it is so easily debunked? Linda wasn't a pervert. The lawsuit claims she didn't do enough to stop something that can't be proven or disproven. it happened 30+ years ago with a guy that is dead. How convenient. The guy was never charged with anything and this crime was never reported until less than a month before Trump was going to win and she was presumed to get a position. https://thehill.com/homenews/education/5004553-trump-education-linda-mcmahon-wwe-child-sexual-abuse-lawsuit/

I thought we were getting rid of it a d letting the states do their own thing?

There are two prevailing theories as to why Hinter got the pardon A. His lawyer peomised a tell all book or interview if he didn't. B. Kash was made FBI Director and they knew he wouldn't be as easily influenced.

It's what he wants to hear. Might as well comply. He's not going to talk about out reality.

That's not what it said and I watched the staged documentary, so I know those videos are in it. One video even had a woman drop off a bunch of votes, then walk back to her car and come back with more. Like I said, that isn't necessarily illegal. It is legal to collect ballots and take them to a drop box in GA, assuming you don't alter them or dump the ones you don't like. 2000 Mules had some interesting information but it jumped to conclusions. They did know that 2000 phones visited the drop boxes at least 10 times. And some of the patterns of movement lend themselves to the possibility of fraud. However, it doesn't prove anything because ballot harvesting was legal in GA. So, they could have gone to nursing homes, hospitals, elderly or handicapped individuals and collected ballots to drop off. Illegal ballot submissions is just one of dozens of possible reasons. Without coroborating evidence, it was nothing more than political fodder. However, the statement that was put out was that one video was definitely not as advertised and that calls into question the others. It does not prove the other kids are wrong, or what the motivations of the people that owned the 2000 phones that visited the drop boxes. In summary, nothing is proven or disproven either by the movie or the statement.

Ага, я российский шпион, посланный сеять дезинформацию

Ok, so you didn't read the link, did you? What the link says is that one video was improperly linked to geodata. It does not say the data was wrong or that the video wasn't from the drop box. Truly, the videos are only visual markers to give you confirmation of the data. The data is what matters. However, several videos do show people dropping multiple ballots on multiple occasions. An act that, in and of itself, isn't illegal but would be if those ballots were created rather than harvested. It is legal in GA to pick up ballots to be dropped off.

Yeah, ok. You are shìt posting about me because you are concerned about me. That third party is watching. There is always someone watching. And you are pulling a Jim Carey:

You are mad. Why? Why do you give me the power to upset you?

He's qualified: He was a public defender, he worked for the DOJ, he was a liaison to the Joint Special Operations Command, and he worked in the DNI. He's imminently qualified.

You actually think this hurts me, don't you? I'm not basing my opinions on my emotions and your attempt to harm me with a post on an obscure forum is hardly going to move me in any direction. It gets even better. You are proving my point. The media and the left, like you, don't get that your insults aren't working. In fact, they have the opposite effect. I don't write what I write on here to change your mind. You are lost to emotional delusions and will forever be so. I write what I write for those that haven't committed in one way or another, to an ideology. It is those people that I hope to instill some lasting thoughts that give them the support they need to make a rational decision. When you come on here and make unfounded claims that I am fat, lazy and unemployed, I don't look bad, you do. Your words always speak about you.

All you are doing is supporting my position. There is a representative democracy that is similar to what Cali does. They have reps and then the citizens of Cali vote for legislation. As a country, we dont do that. Our reps write, sponsor and vote on legislation. We are a constitutional republic. We use the democratic principle that all citizens (in good standing...aka not in jail) vote on who represent them. But we are not a democracy in that we don't vote on legislation.

Trump picks Florida sheriff Chad Chronister for DEA administrator This is an awful pick. Let's start with this: He violated the First Amendment because of a wrong minded executive order. He does not hold the conviction to protect rights. He allowed himself to be convinced to be a tyrant, "for the greater good." His lack of moral fortitude makes him a horrible pick. It is also being reported that he supports Red Flag laws. Those are laws that suspend the rights of citizens for unsubstantiated reports. Those laws are clearly a violation of the Constitution. A theme that seems to be part of his resume.

Not relevant to the conversation and in no way does that support your incorrect definition. But ok.

Can someone translate?

With a normal poster, I would say this is a sarcastic post, meant to entertain. But I'm pretty sure you actually believe every word you said.