gatomontes99

The thing we haven't discussed is that Hunter can't take the fifth for any federal crime for which he is deposed. He can't take the fifth because he can't be incriminated. If the DOJ calls him in to ask him about his activities in Joe's influence peddling scheme, he has to answer honestly or face perjury charges. Joe has given the DOJ a gift.

He's not going to do that, especially after my response that destroyed his attempt at discrediting the data.

Why do you lie when it is so easily debunked? Axios is reporting no cuts. Axios is as lwnj as it gets.

Ok. So when Trudumbass declares Marshall Law, don't expect us to come save you.

You are fùçķèd

People are policy: If th DOGE is going to work, we have to make Republicans get in line.

Then how do you explain this:

I don't understand why you tolerate these things.

So? That doesn't justify murder!

This is a perfect example of how the left justifies violence. They justified violence in Ferguson. They justified violence in Minneapolis. They justified violence in Atlanta. They justified violence in L.A. twice. They cheered when Trump was shot and lamented it wasn't a better shot. They lamented the second shooter didn't get close enough. Now they are cheering that a CEO is shot because they don't like his business practices.

You are a sad little man. Heaven for it autocorrect or a typical enter the free undiscovered.

Can't attack the bill, so you attack the man? What's wrong with focusing the USSS on protective duties?

The data comes from Texas DPS. It takes a bias to reality to find the reality. Try the smell test. We know NYC, San Fran, Chicago and more are not reporting immigration status at arrest. If the status isn't being reported, how can the data, that supports this idea that illegal aliens are model citizens, be valid? It can't. The data does not discern who is and isn't an illegal alien in many large sections. Further, we know from Texas' data that even when an effort is made to report the immigration status, it takes a considerable amount of time to get complete and accurate data. You may consider the website to have a lean to it, but you can't refute it's facts. The data is accurate.

This is the adults doing the legislating. The USSS fell short, a lot. This is a great first step. The FBI will take over counterfeiting and other investigations not related to protecting the President and other protectees.

He won't post in this thread again.

The ironic, hypocrisy of this is amazing. These sanctimonious asṣholes opine on and on about consumer this and rights that, but they have never seen a tax they didn't love and they have never said no to spending. They've never worked a day in their life, much less owned and run a business. They just want to make statements that the low information, emotionally stunted liberals will love.

This is one of those "there are lies, damn lies and then there are statistics" situations. Most cities and states dont do a very good job of tracking immigration status for arrests. Texas, however, does. Even with that, it sometimes takes years to get an accurate picture. When we do, this is what it looks like: Figure 1. Homicide Convictions in Texas per 100K Figure 2. Sexual Assault Convictions in Texas per 100K https://cis.org/Report/Misuse-Texas-Data-Understates-Illegal-Immigrant-Criminality Statistics can say whatever you want. All you have to do is drop some data you don't like and, violà, no crime problem. A lot of those jobs pay poorly, have no benefits, no overtime rules, no tax withholding, and no security. And it is that way because illegal aliens can't exactly complain about it. If they weren't here, those jobs would have to conform to our labor laws.

Trump was never indicted for an insurrection. Even the corrupt Biden DOJ couldn't pull that one off.

There was no Russian collusion, just stop. Don't be intentionally stupid.

So you must really hate Rachel Maddow then? https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/03/27/rachel-maddows-deep-delusion-226266/ Rachel Maddow’s Deep Delusion https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/msnbcs-fake-news-finally-catches-up-to-it-in-court-judge-rules-hosts-made-verifiably-false-statements/ar-BB1pPxAS MSNBC's Fake News Finally Catches Up to It in Court - Judge Rules Hosts Made ‘Verifiably False' Statements She was verifiably misleading people for 2 years. That must make you absolutely hate her.

I can come up with policy disagreements and articulate them. All you have been able to say is you think he is an aśshole.

Lmao..ok...so in your fantasy world, people that won't put their name to a statement are more reliable than the people that go on public record?

How telling of you. I didn't like Kamala's policies because she wanted to tax unrealized capital gains, should would have continued the open border policies, she wanted to raise taxes, she showed no sign of cutting the budget, she was weak on international politics and so much more. Oh, and she's a big ole lib. But you immediately went to race. Are you projecting? Do you hate Tucker because he's a white male?