gatomontes99

This is more than just a bad policy. This is criminal neglect that led to the deaths of thousands of Americans. Next year, the House should impeach Joe Biden AND Kamala Harris and convict them in the Senate, thus keeping both of them out of politics for life and sending a message to the libs that we will not tolerate this any more. You know what, throw in Mayorkas.

It used to be just women did this. But I guess guys want in on this kind of stuff too, now. Remember Deshaun Qatson? Former Houston Texans quarterback was accused of sexual assault. He was dismissed from the team and then later completely exhaunerated. We absolutely should not jump to conclusions until it is all said and done. However, this does appear to be outside of Jay Z's personality.

You do know consumers pay the wages of employees? One of two things will happen: -prices go up -jobs leave the country

True, but societal injustice was greatly bastardized.

Curch ALS Foundation Susan G Komen Haven House

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113618551122258874

What are you talking about? Smh

Including a SCOTUS justice and she is one.

Do you really want the definition? I suspect not. Neither do these guys above. That's why they are making fun of you. If you behaved like a normie, we could have a conversation. But you behave like an ulwnj. You wont have an intelligent conversation. So you get treated as such.

In 2020, the top 1% of earners paid about 42.3% of all federal income taxes, while the bottom 50% paid only about 3.1% of the total. How much more would be the fair share? https://www.federalbudgetinpictures.com/do-the-rich-pay-their-fair-share/

I mean, who would make weapons as a nonprofit? If you'll remember, Obama had gutted the military to the point that they didn't have money to fly training missions or shoot rifles or fix ships or vehicles. It was bad. Trump spent money to fix all of that. But he also worked on pulling our troops out of places that we didn't need to be.

Typical.

Trimming the fat only gets you so far, but it's a start. Then we have to have real conversations about what is and what isn't needed.

The DOGE is advisory panel that will suggest cuts to spending and regulations to the house and senate. In some cases, the President MIGHT be able to use an EO. However, spending is a congressional power. All spending changes will go through the house then senate.

No. Justifying a murder is calling for violence. Just like those that lamented that the Trump's shooter didn't do better were supporting more attempts. The CEO may not have been a good person in your view, but he wasn't a theocratic dictator that committed thousands and thousand of autrocities and sought extermination of people because of their religion.

Nope. Being Christian doesn't make you perfect. Just the opposite. But the compassion doesn't change even if you do stray off course.

The Mayor had his bank account drained. Did they even have a trial?

The fact they don't exist makes them disappear.

Meanwhile, Canada is putting LSD in their drinking water:

With this opinion in mind, do you think you are better than him? Only because you agree with one and not the other. Actually, John McCain had a very good, market based solution, that addressed the real cost issues. But the left rejected a true solution. No one is saying it is their fault for getting cancer (thaough some cancers are a result of individual action, just like heart disease and diabetes). However, pointing to other options that are available isn't wrong minded. It is the opposite, really. People usually over state support for what ever they support, and that is you here. It would be safe to say that well under half of the country feels that this guy deserved to die. What is more troubling is that more than 1% do think he should die. You should look deep in your heart and ask yourself if you like who you've become.

Not what he was talking about.

They have no moral values because they reject God. If you don't have God as the determiner of what is good and right, then morals are subjective. If morals are subjective, then you can justify anything you like. Then morals can flow with what ever the emotion of the moment is and what feels good becomes what is right.

Well, he wrote a book titled War on Warriors. And he said: It's his mission to ensure that the top brass have the best interests of everyone in mind. That includes not fighting wars just because. What you posted was someone else characterization what he said. What he actually said is vastly different. When you read or hear someone characterize someone else's words, you should find the actual words that were said. Here they are: To properly characterize what he said is that there could be a temple built, he just didn't know how that could happen. As for his book, American Crusade, the book is a topical discussion of right v left in our political spectrum and whether or not the American values of liberty and freedom will give way to regulations and laws. It has nothing to do with Muslims other than to say that the countries that harbor or support terrorism can and should be banned and it shouldn't matter if they happen to be Muslim theocracies.

Sorry, but I'm downvoting all the people that justify taking a father and husband away from his family because you don't like his business practices.

And the left will justify the violence.