gatomontes99

Yesterday, I was joking when I said they asked Hegseth when he stopped beating his wives. Honestly, I'm shocked that they did. The TDS is so strong they don't see it anymore

Well, buddy, ain't no one here looking for your respect. And, buddy, ain't no one caring about your bullshìt anonymous claims. And, buddy, where you pissed off at Jimmy Carter's funeral?

Impartial third party?! Lmbo. The LA Times is no more an impartial third party than you or I. While everyone says they are underfunded, this fire chief was proven right. Do you need proof?

And this thread started with the left celebrating the loss of his property because he's "conservative."

In lefty eyes, resisting the right is nonpartisan. Because resisting and nonpartisan are words that make them feel good. It doesn't matter what the words mean.

That memo was a full month before the fires. Nice try though.

I don't believe some random unsourced, unsupported claim. That's what libs do when it involves Trump. I believe the fire chief: Who do you think we should believe? A reporter or the fire chief?

If it is a lie, prove it wrong.

No. They said what was distasteful was the government's actions. And by "the government" they were talking about Jack Smith.

Yall can bìtch all you want, he's getting confirmed. Joni Ernst came around.

If they were nonpartisan, they wouldn't be trying to sabotage his administration.

Oh puh-leez. You'd hate him no matter what. Hell, RFK is a Democrat and you hate him just because Trump nominated him. The problem here isn't Hegseth or Trump. Its you.

Remember how I said People are Policy? Vance understands that the administrative class has to go.

SCOTUS on Jack Smith's political persecution of McDonnell: The SCOTUS attacked Jack Smith's tactics as distasteful and certified it 8-0. He is a danger to a functional legal system. Q. E. D.

You haven't answered the question because you understand the question, if answered accurately, disproves your position. The avenues that the Trump team used were law suits. It is not illegal to file a law suit. It is not illegal to ask the Senate to consider alternate electors. This is all just DNC talking points.

I'm not playing games. I'm asking a simple question.

I'm asking if a failed law suit is fraud.

Is it fraud?

Do you think a failed law suit should be fraud?

No. It's the bastardized characterization of what happened, fueled by partisan hatred. The reality is Trump was incredulous that GA let Joe "find" votes in the middle of the night. Then he concocted alternate electors to serve if the legal challenges worked. They did not. He then asked the Senate to consider certifying them, they did not. Election over. It wasn't illegal. It was a bit of a Hail Mary.

Lol. Sure. "We all know Trumonos a Russian asset and will move to destroy America. But, if any President ordered you to attack American citizens, would you do it?" Yeah, they weren't talking about Trump.

Meaningless Meaningless Meaningless DNC talking points. More DNC talking points. More DNC talking points. JFK did this exact thing in Hawaii.

Oh good. A one sided story with no opportunity for a counter argument. This should be valuable.