gatomontes99

Lmao...ok Beev.

Didn't the left get all up in arms over the perception that Trump might have made fun of someone? Not a single lefty on this board has even mentioned that Crockett is disparaging a man because a tree fell on him.

You keep using that term incorrectly. Nothing I said was misleading and the videos are not misleading. The videos illustrate a series of lies. To be a Gish Gallup, you have to make up a bunch of misleading or untrue statements. Yes, he's likely lying. However, there also appears to be a misunderstanding of terms. War plans are detailed. From what I've seen, the Signal messages are generic and broad. So Hegseth is probably telling the truth there. But he did say the messages didn't happen, and that is a lie. I will not firmly decide the full extent of my opinion until I see all of the information. It will be a bit before all of that is out.

Both are screw ups and those clips are an extremely small example of left wing lies. None of which have you ever spoken out against. If Pete is lying (and it is likely he is) then he needs to stop, own it and move on. It'll serve him well.

Lmao.. 3 links, all from a lwnj that hated Trump. Now, here is why the article itself is a lie. The 4 year period he portends.to have counted the "lies" is 1460 days. That would have meant Trump lied 21 times a day. He didn't even make 21 statements a day. Somehow, your lwnj, desguised as a "journalist", counted more lies than statements.

No. I said the whole thing was a screw up. I'm on the side of consistent. You are the one that is both decrying and excusing lies depending on the side of the aisle they are on.

Do you want to go through the list of Biden era lies that y'all never gave a damn about? Don't be such verifiable hypocrites.

Innocent until proven guilty does not apply to immigration law, as my link describes. You can be deported without a hearing, court appearance, etc. In some instances, a Border Patrol, Customs or ICE agent can deport an individual or group.

Yep. That's a major fùck up.

And that proves my point. Demand will always out pace supply.

Hed lose that slap off.

Night and day difference.

Well duh! They were fine, upstanding people that wanted equality in policing and fought an injustice. So they took some cash for lavish homes. Don't we all deserve that?

Somehow, @robosmith has no knowledge of any current topics.

Those that subject themselves to the scurge of the century have relinquished freedom for security and got neither. The inevitable conclusion of all UHC is that the supply will be out paced by demand. The only solution is to pick winners and losers. The winners are the government. The losers are you.

I am. You are the one trying to make Harry's actions about Trump. It's sad really.

I like cauliflower crust pizza. And I couldn't not care less what no one thinks.

That's not a report. That is a complaint. That complaint was later dismissed. And, as I said, if this Gotham hired some astroterf it kind of proves my point is viable. What hypicrisy? Do you see no difference between paying people to harrass elected officials and background actors that wear t-shirts? Because I see a big difference. Not only is he paying people to act like asśholes, he is also trying to incite violence. You get awfully mad about this stuff. Why?

Please don't repeat such easily disprovable lies. It just get tiresome. USA Today: There is no epidemic of fatal police shootings against unarmed Black Americans

*Gasp!* You don't say? Both sides? I'm shocked. My whole world has been rocked. It's so bad that my sarcasm filter just plum fell off.

A sucker born every minute you say. Do you want to hazard a guess as to who the sucker was that was born at the same time as you? You are quoting an article that has an anonymous source with an unverified email from a supposed 4th party that may or may not have found people. And to you, that's proof that he did use extras? Its not proof. I also can't prove there wasn't a paid extra in there. But I do know Gotham says they didn't charge enough to pay extras. That's not nothing. Even if there were, so what? Doesn't that lend credence to my point? Doesnt that make it plausible that Harry is talking about paid agitators?

Awww. Were you triggered?