-
Posts
7,779 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
62
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by gatomontes99
-
The Tennessean released excerpts of the police report about the girl that shot up the religious school in Nashville. Not surprisingly, she did it for the notiriety. She wanted her guns to be displayed in a museum. She wanted her room to be preserved just as she left it. She wanted everyone to pour over her 1200+ page manifesto. And she chose the school because it was a soft target and mostly white. She didn't want to be branded a raćist. So she was a nùt job. No surprise there. And kudos to the Nashville police for not releasing her manifesto. But wtf'n hell are they doing here: "Due to the sound of gunfire and the fire alarm, the report said the suspect did not hear police make their way through the lobby to confront the shooter. One officer fired a 5.56 mm caliber rifle at the shooter, striking the shooter and knocking them to the ground. A second officer fired a 9mm pistol at the shooter, fatally wounding them." Them? Are you kidding me?! Them?! She goes on a murderous rampage to kill children and NPD wants to be respectful to this evil bìtch? Fùck that! Fùck them!
-
The economic disaster is doing nothing. The uneducated and uninformed think this will start and economic war. The rest of us know the first strike has already happened. China charges 67% tariffs to the US. Its new tariff will be 34%. The European Union charges 39% tariffs to the US. Its new tariff will be 20%. Vietnam charges 90% tariffs to the US. Its new tariff will be 46%. Taiwan charges 64% tariffs to the United States. Its new tariff will be 32%. Japan charges 46% tariffs to the US. Its new tariff will be 24%. India charges 52% tariffs to the US. Its new tariff will be 26%. South Korea charges 50% tariffs to the US. Its new rate will be 25%. Thailand charges 72% tariffs to the US. Its new rate will be 36%. Switzerland charges 61% tariffs to the US. Its new rate will be 31%. Indonesia charges 64% tariffs to the US. Its new rate will be 32%. Malaysia charges 47% tariffs to the US. Its new rate will be 24%. Cambodia charges 97% tariffs to the US. Its new rate will be 49%. South Africa charges 60% tariffs to the US. Its new rate will be 30%. Bangladesh charges 74% tariffs to the US. Its new rate will be 37%. Pakistan charges 58% tariffs to the US. Its new rate will be 29%. Sri Lanka charges 88% tariffs to the US. Its new rate will be 44%. Jordan charges 40% tariffs to the US. Its new rate will be 20%. Madagascar charges 93% tariffs to the US. Its new rate will be 47%. Myanmar (Burma) charges 88% tariffs to the US. Its new rate will be 44%. Tunisia charges 55% tariffs to the US. Its new rate will be 28%. Kazakhstan charges 54% tariffs to the US. Its new rate will be 27%. Serbia charges 74% tariffs to the US. Its new rate will be 37%. Laos charges 95% tariffs to the US. Its new rate will be 48%. Botswana charges 74% tariff to the US. Its new rate will be 37%. Papua New Guinea charges 50% tariffs to the US. It’s new rate will be 10%. Afghanistan charges 49% tariffs to the US. It’s new rate will be 10%. Syria charges 81% tariff to the US. It’s new rate will be 41%. Reunion charges 73% tariffs to the US. It’s new rate will be 37% Saint Pierre and Miquelon charge 99% tariffs to the US. Their new rate will be 50%. Nauru charges 59% Terrace to the US. It’s new rate will be 30%. https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/hold-white-house-announces-full-list-tariff-rates-here-are-top-20?utm_source=mux&utm_medium=social-media&utm_campaign=social-media-autopost
-
Meme/Cartoon of the Day
gatomontes99 replied to WestCanMan's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
-
Isn't it weird that the numbers are so skewed? Liberal justice got 1.3M votes. Conservative justice got 1.06M votes. But the referendum on voter ID got 1.4M. The liberal justice promised to shoot down any voter ID laws. So almost 400,000 people voted for someone that would use her power to thwart their will? that just doesn't make any sense.
-
Both FL Reps win
gatomontes99 replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
We are not a democracy. You need to understand that. A democracy is majority rule, rights be damned. We are a republic. Rights are more important than majority opinion. Lmao...a 15 point win in districts where they were outspent 20:1 and you spin that as they barely won? Are you fùcking kidding me? -
https://www.cnn.com/election/2025 Both races in Florida are called for the Republicans. Guess there isn't a lot of buyer's remorse. This is after the democrats poured tons of money into both races. Way to waste that money Dems.
-
Link “When we saw these numbers, we’re like, ‘What is this?’ In 2021, you see 270,000 people; it goes all the way to 2.1 million in 2024. These are noncitizens getting Social Security numbers. This literally blew us away—like, we went there to find fraud, and we found this by accident,” he added. “So what happens then?” he continued. “Once you’re in the country and you’ve got asylum … you can apply for a work document. You file a 765; it’s the work form. You get this form called the 766 — that’s the authorization — and then the Social Security Administration automatically sends you your Social Security number in the mail. No interview, no ID.” Musk then piped up to share his belief that this handing out of millions of Social Security numbers to illegal aliens was done purposefully. “People sometimes think under the Biden administration, he was simply asleep at the switch,” Musk began. “He wasn’t asleep; they weren’t asleep at the switch. It was a massive, large-scale program to import as many illegals as possible, ultimately to change the entire voting map of the United States and disenfranchise the American people and make it a permanent deep blue one-party state from which there would be no escape.” ****************************** I wanted to type that it is amazing the fraud the left has been committing. But it isn't. What's amazing is that we are finding the proof.
-
2 steps forward, one step back. But the momentum is in the right direction.
-
My rules apply to liberals that are losing an argument. Yet, he starts the argument with rule #4. I guess he knows he's losing before he even starts. The irony of this is the video he posted has a quote from Hillary that is far more like what Goebbels said about Europeans that didn’t hate Jews. Hillary: "It’s not the hypocrisy that bothers me; it’s the stupidity. We’re all shocked — shocked!" Politico Goebbels: "The naivete, not to mention ignorance, with which certain European circles see the Jewish Question in the fourth year of this gigantic struggle is astonishing." Calvin.edu
-
It's a step in the right direction.
-
Let's see, $40 million to get violent illegal aliens out of the country or "$59 million to house illegal immigrants in luxury New York City hotels just [one] week" FoxNews
-
Well, then, it's a good thing nothing was classified. I was speaking in terms of how Goldberg viewed it. Like most libs, he wasn't viewing things realistically. They didn't lie or deny anything. What are you smoking? Yes. He did sell it. Magazines, even internet based magazines, make money. They aren't charities. He published content that he knew he shouldn't have with the intent of harming the image of Pete Hegseth et. al.
-
Skin-folk should be our kinfolk
gatomontes99 replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
It's a folksy way of saying black people have to support black people. It's racism disguised as activism. -
It's not against standards. In fact, there is a Biden era memo that endorses using Signal. However, you are trying to dismiss the fact that Goldberg had a responsibility to inform and dismiss himself from the chat and his retention of materials he believed were classified is a violation of law. His selling of that information (that he believed was classified) is also illegal.
-
Let's talk about out the untouched topic here. If Goldberg thought he was seeing classified information: Why didn't he notify those in the chat and leave? Why did he keep screenshots? It seems to me that Goldberg used the opportunity of this mistake to gather information he thought he wasn't allowed to have with the intent of disseminating that information to the public. That would be a major violation of federal law. The fact that he was wrong about it being classified is immaterial. He intended to keep classified information and sell it via his magazine.
