gatomontes99

Great, rational and accurate post. He will call you a liar though. Because you used the definition of the word based on logic. His definition of the word is based on the feels. He hates white conservatives and racism is something he hates so the word fits...in his feels. I'd say mind, but that really isnt accurate.

The simple answer to both of these posts is that there are a lot of people on the left that believe that black people can't be racist. @robosmithwas kind (or dumb) enough to illustrate that for us. This argument that it takes power to be racist is absurd. Especially when the left defines racism as anything that offends a black person. I mean if it can be as simple as saying "you people" then you sure don't need power to oppress to be racist.

There is one exception to the rule. We will call it the Al Franken rule. If someone is harmful to the cause, even if they are truly dedicated, then it is OK to throw them off the commie train for the good of the cause.

Ah, but why didn't they call Biden racist? He called black guys boy. He said he didn't want schools to turn into jungles with integration. He authored the bill that locked up black men at alarming rates. He is a white male. He is rich. He is everything that definition would define as racist. Except he's on their side and their side can do no wrong.

Is it true? Is it impossible for a black woman to be racist? That's what she claims. This is not a double standard. Not in the lefts collective hive mind. This is the standard. In their collective hive mind, the right is racist, fascist, authoritarian, Hitler-esque, sexist, anti-democratic, and whatever else gives them bad vibes. However, even if they fit the exact definition of those words, they aren't racist, fascist, authoritarian, Hitler-esque, sexist, anti-democratic, and whatever else gives them bad vibes. That is their standard. They can't be bad because they are on their side. We can't be good because we are not on their side. This is why we can't care what they say. We can't care what they think. We can't care what they do. Everything they do is flawed by their blind belief that everything they do is right and everything we do is evil.

Fify

Dude took a social media company that never showed a profit and made a profit. For that, you think he failed? Couldn't refute it so you attacked the source. If only someone had a way to predict you would do that. 🔽👇⬇️⏬️

They don't have to be convicted to be criminals or deported in regards to immigration law: https://www.usatoday.com/pages/interactives/graphics/deportation-explainer/

He says he worked for a Democrat governor and he only takes on clients he believes in. You do the math.

Crowds on Demand was founded by a Democrat for Democrats. He won't take on Republicans.

Yes he did: "We have people going to the Republican districts and going after..." To "have people [go]" is to command them to do it. If you command them to do it, they will require some form of compensation. Sure, some will volunteer. But most will need money. LA TIMES: Crowds on Demand, a Beverly Hills firm that’s an outspoken player in the business of hiring protesters, boasts on its website that it provides its clients with “protests, rallies, flash-mobs, paparazzi events and other inventive PR stunts.… We provide everything including the people, the materials and even the ideas.” And here is their flyer: I wonder how many Kamala rallies faced low turnout and needed help? Lou Dobbs: Kamala Harris Buses in People From Massachusetts to Her New Hampshire Rally (VIDEO)

Ok Or https://www.businessofapps.com/data/twitter-statistics/ Twitter was losing money. It is now profitable. Revenue is down. But so are costs. That's why it is making money.

I think I'll take my link with facts over your opinion and speculation.

Gawd, you people just don't get it: X in 2024 Doubled Highest Yearly Twitter Profits If he breaks the government like that, I'm in.

Y'all have a comprehension problem. He was pointing out the scale at which our fiat currency was being abused. It's a sad state when y'all just accept that as fine or normal.

@robosmith, you claim to be for science. What do you call someone with XX chromosomes? XY? I'm waiting with bated breath.

Drunk Kamala passes as an intellectual in their eyes. It's so weird.

When you see these townhalls and there are protestors, know that they are paid operatives. There is noone willing to go act like a fool just because they don't like DOGE or whatever.

Do you want to know how I know that you know what you said is bullshit? You claimed it was an abuse of power while also complaining his campaign did it. Campaigns have no power. You know that. The only thing they did, was sell some internal polling to a Ukrainian with ties to Russia. Manafort was the sole arbiter of that deal. The campaign didn't know.

I don't see how she's not drunk or high. She's definitely not right.

In a coordinated effort by the U.S. Marshal Service (USMS) Southeast Regional Fugitive Task Force (SERFTF), USMS Great Lakes Regional Fugitive Task Force, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Chicago Police Department, a high-ranking member of the Venezuelan street gang Tren De Aragua (TDA) was arrested yesterday in Cobb County, Georgia. Ricardo Gonzales, 32, had an arrest warrant from the Chicago Police Department for kidnapping and is wanted on probable cause for two counts of first-degree murder and attempted first-degree murder. These charges stem from an incident on January 28 where Gonzalez is accused of kidnapping three female victims and taking them to an alley in Chicago where they were all shot in the head. Two were pronounced dead on the scene and the surviving victim was able to escape and call 911. And the left will tell you that they are stealing you SSN and destroying government while the government is actually doing it's job far more effectively than any time in my life.

@robosmith what do you call a human with XX chromosones? XY?

And Elon is meeting with the DOD to discuss military tactics re: China. Don't forget that in you list of conspiracy theories.

You are seriously delusional if you believe that.

They also didn't have nukes. And we lost 34,000 men. Are you willing to kill as many, if not more, in Russia?