gatomontes99

You guys know this is a distraction, right? The left wanted nothing to do with the Epstein files. For 4 years the Biden Council of Presidents did nothing to move those files to the public domain. But, all of a sudden, it is coming out that Obama helped Russia sew discord and create distrust in our elections and BAM! it's Epstein files day! We need them now! TRUMP IS ON THE LIST! It is a distraction.

You LIES! PMSLSD is rotting your TDS brain! You have no proof! Only your unqualified opinion!

Baseless conspiracy theories...based on actual, archived communications. What a fantasy world they live in.

So...Hillary was so insufferable that her doctor and staff kept her heavily sedated so she wouldn't show her crazy. And Russia new that! FoxNews (Most Trusted Source by Robosmith) Russia sat on intel of Hillary Clinton's alleged ‘heavy tranquilizers’ use, new docs claim DNI Gabbard declassified a report prepared by the House Intelligence Committee containing the allegations According to the left's allegations, Russia was trying to help Trump. If that's the case, why did they hold onto daming information like Hillary being very sick and heavily sedated? That would have swung several percentage points in his favor. Are they that inept or is the narrative wrong?

You think the ICE riots this spring had fewer protestors than J6? https://www.newsweek.com/map-list-anti-ice-protests-la-2083255 How about how much damage was done? At least $750K to ride share cars alone, plus damage to government buildings, businesses, etc. https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/2025-la-riots-property-damage-32f58c I don't understand why you lie when you are so easily disproven. I know why I just don't understand it. Let me shatter your fantasy world yet again: *start at 25 min* He literally said he would make legitimate efforts to make sure he doesn't become the next president again. Then he sent the #3 at the DOJ to be an entry level prosecuter at a state and he just si happened to work on a case that the AG wouldn't take up. Then he met with the Assistant AG in GA on two occasions to tell them how to prosecute Trump there. But yeah, he didn't do anything...in your fantasy world. Im sorry you don't know how to use links.

Pocahontas said she was Indian and even used that status on her college apps...the left is silent. Biden says he graduated with honors and top of his class...the left is silent. AOC claims she's a Bronx girl but really grew up in the nicest suburb possible...the left is silent. Obama said there was Russia collision when there wasn't...the left is silent. Hillary claimed an embassy attack was caused by a youtuber making a satirical video when it was really just a terror attack...the left is silent. Everyone in the Biden admin claimed Jie was fit as a fiddle and running circles around them when he was one fall away from being bound in a wheel chair while dying of cancer and incapable of coherent thought from 4pm to 10 am...the left is silent. But Trump gets a story wrong (may have been a lie he was told) and the left sees that as the end of the world. So what if the story was wrong? Seriously. Does it, in any way, change your life? Did this get him votes? Did it cost you money? Did it put you in jail? Did it erode the security of the nation? You people are losing it. Seriously.

Its really weird that Trump would send an official to the jail to give a plea deal to the woman that arranged all these illegal activities if he was actually participating in them. He must be an evil genius because that sounds like something a guilty man wouldn't do.

Does anyone remember how the left just lost their minds when this report came out? ‐--------------‐---------------- Politico President Donald Trump said he doesn’t “see any reason why” Russia would interfere with the 2016 election, at an extraordinary press conference Monday with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The comment is the latest instance of Trump breaking with the U.S. intelligence community but was all the more explosive when said standing next to Putin, after a nearly two-hour one-on-one meeting and extended bilateral summit in Helsinki, Finland. “My people came to me, [Director of National Intelligence] Dan Coats came to me and some others saying they think it’s Russia. I have President Putin, he just said it’s not Russia,” Trump said. “I will say this, I don’t see any reason why it would be.” ‐--------------‐---------------- He was right. The enemy, at that moment, wasn't Putin. It was our own intelligence services.

2 people means all of Scottland? So what about thousands of J6ers? By your logic you agree with them.

The Constitution says: Article 2, Section 4 "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." The only action that can be taken is removal from office. The only other punishment is in Article 1 where the impeached is declared incapable of holding office. Obama is already out of office and incapable of holding office. Impeachment has no effect. But it isn't necessary either. The SCOTUS ruling very clearly stated that activities that exceed the scope of the Constitution are prosecutable. My examples above stand.

It is. But so is ordering the military to kill someone. Yet, he can not order the military to kill just anyone. That is why the SCOTUS stated there is absolute immunity for core responsibilities but limited immunity on the edge. Trump can demand the GA AG investigate missing ballots and ballot irregularities, even if he is wrong. He could not tell the AG to print ballots to change the election. Obama cannot just make up intelligence to leak to the press to undermine the income administration. Now, he could have released true and valid data. That would have been in the scope. The line is crossed when the information is wholly fiction. That's possible but not necessary. Well, yes and no. After the President is out of office, impeachment isn't possible. So, either we have to discover violations of the law and his duties while in office or trials are possible after the term is over. Impeachment IS necessary during the term. That is indisputable. After the term, normal judicial process is acceptable. There will be issues with immunity that will be brought forth as a defense. But those immunities are not absolute if the intent of the duties listed in the Constitution are violated. And there is the inevitable liberal retort that they are only doing it because Oabama is black. We'd have to hear that day after day. Never mind that Obama isn't black. But that's a different topic.

Actually, it is not an official duty to make up intelligence to undermine an incoming administration. It can be prosecuted.

What illegal campaign add existed in your fantasy world? The intelligence report that Obama ordered to be changed said there was no collusion and not material interference. So what crime do you think existed in your fantasy world? You do know they tried to hack the RNC as well? Its just that the RNC wasn't stùpid enough to click on the phishing attack? James Comey testified in January of 2017, when he was still FBI director, that Russians tried to targeted the Republican National Committee in 2016. “There was evidence of hacking directed at state-level organizations, state-level campaigns, and the RNC, but old domains of the RNC,” Based on fake intelligence. Are you proud of that?

Does not apply to treason. Treason is giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Russia is our enemy. Russia wanted to sew discord and destroy confidence in our electoral system. Obama's actions furthered those goals. Obama gave aid and comfort to the enemy. Material aid and comfort. Actual help.

You LIES! You don't even have a link to your opinion! I can think of 3 violent political events in L.A. alone. Never mind the Portland Chaz zone, the Dallas sniper, etc. No. It was a reaction to the Democrats', Banana Republic style justice. Do you think it is ok to lock up a woman that prayed in the Capitol building but let an ex-president that weaponized the intelligence community to undermine the next administration off with no consequences? You clearly didn't watch the video. If you did, then good gawd man. His example was that as a Conservative, his response to a disaster like a damn breaking in Alabama is to gather people and donate supplies and ask you to help. If you don't help, you can just walk away and we do what we can. As a liberal, your response to the disaster would be to create government programs, mandate new systems and use the government to buy disaster relief supplies. If I say I don't want to give my taxes to that, you will arrest me and if I resist the officers can use force. Liberals are more comfortable with using violence to enforce what they want.

Whe this fantasy world comes crashing down for you, I'm glad I won't be there.

https://fb.watch/B1ccwQC0el/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v My wife sent me this and it was such a great way to frame the differences between Conservatives and Liberals. The thesis is that liberals are more comfortable with violence. He supports it quite nicely.

Democrats are getting a first hand lesson on what FAFO means: Justice.gov WASHINGTON – Today, the Department of Justice announced the formation of a Strike Force to assess the evidence publicized by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and investigate potential next legal steps which might stem from DNI Gabbard’s disclosures. This Department takes alleged weaponization of the intelligence community with the utmost seriousness. Upon the formation of the Strike Force, Attorney General Pamela Bondi stated: “The Department of Justice is proud to work with my friend Director Gabbard and we are grateful for her partnership in delivering accountability for the American people. We will investigate these troubling disclosures fully and leave no stone unturned to deliver justice.” ----‐----------------‐---------- I want to celebrate, but there have been so many times the Republicans have pussied out. If they actually follow through, I'll be pleasantly surprised. I am hopefully that I will be surprised.

You just like lying, don't you? The point of the release was that the assessments were altered to say that Russia preferred Trump when the actual intelligence had no such statement. It also talks about how they used those fake intelligence reports to spy on Trump's campaign, sent a spy to plant a story with an aid and released all this info for the useful idìots to repeat, regardless of evidence to the contrary.

The best example in there is Rome. there were multiple reasons Rome fell: History.com Tarrifs and trade deals had nothing to do with it. However, political corruption, over spending, military degradation and moral decline were factors that are similarly problems today. We are publishing (and hopefully correcting) political corruption. We have cut $1.3T in mandatory spending, $900B in discretionary spending, raised tax revenues and begun eliminating "cash cow" programs that feed money directly into politicians' bank accounts. The BBB had new spending for the military to upgrade equipment and replenish stocks of artillery, bullets, missiles, etc. We are also ending racist hiring practices pushed by DEI, preventing the physical and mental abuse children undergo in gender transition therapy and enforcing laws (like Biden's border policy) that effectively enslaved millions of workers at jobs with criminally low wages or illegal and illicit work as prostitutes or drug mules. So, we were headed in the wrong direction. Hopefully this admin will reverse all of that and tariffs/deals will be part of that solution not the problem.

It's like you want to be wrong. Grassley runs the committee. He got the committee to do it ergo, Grassley declassified the documents. Translation to robo speak You LIES! You believe PMSLSD!

Meh...not really. Let's say you own a business and you need a fleet of vehicles. The typical car dealer will bend over backwards to get your business because you are reliably the highest volume consumer. Yeah, they may take a hit on the profit, but they will take that hit because the alternative is piecing together dozens, if not hundreds, of single buyers. The US is the powerhouse market. There is no replacing our demand.

This isn't a guaranteed outcome. It will depend on a ton of variables from price elasticity, to domestic production. What it does do is inicentivize domestic production and dissentivize imports. Japan's deal is a perfect example. If they produce nthe goods in the US they get a huge break. That means jobs for Americans.

It absolutely kills them that we are leveraging our economic process to further our domestic interests by negotiating trade deals with foreign powers. The beautiful truth is, the rest of the world needs us to prop up their economies. Without the economy of the United States, all other nations...read that again...ALL OTHER NATIONS would have difficulty maintaining their economy. However, for the United States, there isn't a single economy that we can't survive and thrive without. As the party that can legitimately walk away from any deal, we have all the power.

FoxNews (The most trusted name in news) "We just completed a massive Deal with Japan, perhaps the largest Deal ever made," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "Japan will invest, at my direction, $550 Billion Dollars into the United States, which will receive 90% of the Profits. This Deal will create Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs — There has never been anything like it." Trump said Japan will open its country to trade in things like cars, trucks, rice and other agricultural products. ----‐----------------‐---------- In other news, the tariffs that are in place have raised over $100B in revenue. This is what we voted for. This is working.