CdnFox

That's because you already strained your imagination pretending there was any in there to begin with. You are literally in the middle of derailing this thread with no help for me and you're trying to suggest somehow your behavior is my fault That's because Every accusation you make is actually a confession on your part. Nobody derails more threads on this forum than you with the possible exception of exflyer. In fact it's all you do, you never come here and start a thread I have never seen you jump in and participate in a thread on the topic that's at hand. You jump into the middle of threads and derail them and that's all you do This is why literally everyone is laughing at you at this forum the exception of Mike who was the other person that everyone laughs at. What a broken little man you are. I'm sure you will now go on to explain how your bad behavior and your hypocrisy is the all the fault of my postcount You're nothing if not predictable in your stupidity

We're not and literally everyone agrees Kid, trudeau changed the definition of poverty in 2018 and it massively reduced the number of 'poor'. In 2018, the Trudeau government formally adopted the Market Basket Measure (MBM) as Canada's official definition of poverty, a significant shift in how poverty is measured in the country. trudeau changes definition of poverty - Google Search Poverty didn't get better, the definition got better. Also 2015 was an anomaly. IN 2014 it was 11.3 and 2016 it was 12 and change poverty rate in canada 2014 - Google Search poverty rate in canada 2016 - Google Search The 2015 number was created by Justin Trudeau in 2016 To create a baseline in his artificially High because he needed a high number to compare his future numbers to. Then he changed the definition so that tons of people who were poor before now did not qualify So nice try Here's some other proof things are worse As of March 2025, Canadian food bank usage reached an all-time high of roughly 2.2 million monthly visits, a 99% increase since 2019. The highest demographic groups seeking assistance include market renters (approx. 70%), children (33%), and a rapidly rising number of employed individuals (1 in 5 users). CBC +3 Key Poverty Trends (2026 Data Analysis) National Poverty Rate: The rate was 11% in 2024, essentially unchanged from 11.1% in 2023, but sharply higher than the 7% recorded in 2020. Income Decline: Median after-tax income dropped by nearly $2,000, from $77,400 in 2020 to $75,500 in 2024, adjusted for inflation. Rising Food Insecurity: Roughly 9.8 million people (about 24% of the population) reported household food insecurity in 2024. CBC +1 So even with the new definition the reality is you cherry picked your numbers and the number of people living in poverty is about the same as it was under harper except that it would be about 30% higher if we still use the same definition we used during harper's time There's more poor people and the gap between poor and rich is growing

Oh right, I forgot about your dad and the 'incidents'. You go have your cookie and your nap kiddo

Buried Canada in a repressed and depressed economy while destroying the hopes and opportunity of an entire future generation while siphoning money into their own pockets and eating $2,000 a plate airline food? Yeah. We know

They're not really innovating in these industries. They're not making leaps or bounds in battery technology, battery technology is advancing everywhere. However in the North American markets for example the automaker simply aren't interested in pursuing it. But it's not that they couldn't or that the technology doesn't exist. I'm sure china is doing lots of medical research but it does not eclipse western research and I would point out that the mnra covid vaccine they came up with (which we PAID for but never got) was far less effective than the moderna and pfizer products. They're not even in the same league when it comes to chip technology and dozens and dozens and dozens of other Technologies. They're navy is twice the size of Americas but because of the technology gap every expert says the same thing, america would win hands down. The problem is the Chinese structure and it really holds them back from really coming ahead and leaps and bounds. But Technologies wise they are still lagging most other countries in the vast majority of their technology and where they're not it's because others aren't putting a focus there. That may change, is quite possible that they will emerge as true world leaders but that day is definitely not here yet

LOL what was it SUPPOSED to get me? I mean he looks stupid now and everyone seems to agree but honestly people thought he was stupid before he showed up, so no gain When you grow up and get out there in the real world (assuming you ever leave your mommie's basement) you'll learn about adult conversations A better question is what do YOU get out of repeating the same posts endlessly and screaming "LOOOZER!! LOOOOOOZR" constantly till you poop your pants There is no length that the liberals and their supporters won't go to when it comes to lies and self delusion in order to prop up their cult leader and avoid any criticism

:LOL there's NO backpedaling. Vancouver in 2015 was expensive but affordable I've said that from the start, i'm saying it now, i provided tonnes of evidence, and your entire argument was "if they can't afford a house in the british props then it's not affordable" which is simply assinine And all of this was pointed out to you and i even used stats from your own links to show why you were wrong Lie harder cry harder, it's the liberal way

You mean how trump got in because the democrats lied for 3 or more years about the mental health condition of joe biden and then got caught? Yeah, i'm sure they do regret that now. "liar's remorse" indeed LOL

Well this is what the left is like these days. An intelligent person can hear views they disagree with and cope, but those on the left feel the need to lock out any dissenting views. Plus mike reads my stuff all the time anyway and frequently comments on it, but when i ask a tough question or the like he claims "oh sorry you were on ignore" LOL Moon box is no better. He's just cranky right now because instead of picking a fight with me which he usually does he picked one with Goddess and she cleaned his clock and made him look bad every bit as fast as i usually do. If that guy were half as smart as he thinks he is he'd still be twice as smart as he actually is. So you get the two of them derailing a thread while railing about how SOME People derail threads. Gosh if only there was some way of finding these people (holds up mirror for them) They're both pretty dishonest, and dishonest people HAVE to limit their exposure to honest people if they're going to maintain the illusion that they're relevant.

Sure. You should leave. I realize I'm interrupting you do derailing this thread to say that

Here's some more facts for Moonbox to deny: Poverty rate up, incomes down since 2020: Statistics Canada More than one in 10 Canadians are living below the poverty line, according to the latest data from Statistics Canada. While Canada’s 11 per cent poverty rate in 2024 is largely unchanged from 11.1 per cent in 2023, it is well above the seven per cent poverty rate reported in 2020. In the same period, the median after-tax income for Canadian families and unattached individuals – those living alone or with people they’re unrelated to such as roommates – dropped by nearly $2,000 from $77,400 in 2020 to $75,500 in 2024, after adjusting for inflation. Meanwhile carney's out there claiming life has never been so affordable in Canada

Frankly I think this is the solution Recall legislation that allows for the people in a constituency to force a by-election if enough of them are prepared to sign that they want one would allow the constituents to decide whether or not the person's excuse for floor crossing was good enough. If it's not good enough then enough people will sign a petition enforce a by-election and the person can get punted or at least have to face that. If enough people are convinced that it was understandable then the petition doesn't get the support it needs and the floor Crosser goes on their merry way and faces the public at the next election That simple change would still allow people to change sides based on moral or ethical reasons but would still allow the voters in a writing to make a decision as to whether or not that was acceptable. You would just have to work out the magic number of percentage of voters necessary to trigger the violation so that it was not too easy and not too hard

Well they're not really competitors in the technology per se, the technology that they offer is not substantially better than anything that could be made somewhere else. They are massive competitors in the production. They can produce those things cheaper than most other people they are there for major players in the marketplace. Which is great, but you shouldn't confuse the two. Chinese solar panels generate exactly the same amount of energy per square foot that North American panels do and they used exactly the same technology. The Chinese just make them cheaper Same was pretty much everything else that they do, there's very little that they do or build where you could say there is no equivalent elsewhere. Now if your point was that they are positioning themselves as major players in that industry and are successful in that respect then absolutely I agree with you

You literally only ever show up here To insult other people and complain about the posts. I've never seen you start a topic i've never seen you contribute meaningfully to a topic and even this conversation is you and Michael who also doesn't contribute very much whining about the other people instead of actually contributing Your hypocrisy is absolutely stunning

Your mom is underage? How does THAT work?!? I don't think you know what 'pedophilia' is kiddo LOL yeah kid you're doing great

It's an admission that you know she's right and instead of engaging in honest debate you're going to see lion and try and make the issue about her sources instead of the facts and the subject at hand It's an admission of failure on your part. And it is every time you pull this nonsense

And nobody lies about it more than the democrats

With his other talking point today, that Canada is the fastest growing economy in the G7 If you drop from 100 growth to 1 growth, and then climb to 2 growth, you can claim you're growth rate is 100 percent and you're growing the fastest, but it's not much to brag about

LOOOZER LOOZZZZERRRR LOZER !!! I'M WINNING!!!! -Exflyer

LOL You sure do Sounds like it's time for you to ask mom to change your diapers again

Ummm. no. Mulroney did not allow the sale of nexen to go through. That wouldn't happen until 2013 when harper was in power. You can't get ANY of your facts straight can you?

I didn't know your story, that's quite the ordeal to go through. I'm sure it's painful to this day and I'm glad you got out in one piece. It certainly helps explain why you don't suffer this type of foolishness lightly. I would imagine that seeing this type of blind devotion and avoidance of facts sets off all kinds of red flags for you. I find their antics amusing so sometimes I forget that while it can seem I'm using the harm is kind of thinking can do is very real. And the real world harm people who think like this can do can be horrible for those around them

Yeah I noticed that The tactic is referred to as sea lioning officially but we've seen it for many years. When they can't deal with the facts or the argument they see lion like crazy or pick one small minutiae element and try and make the entire argument about that If you say the pancakes are good they'll demand 10 cites proving it. And when you do provide them they'll claim a) the cite says the pancakes are TASTY, not "GOOD" so it's false, OR that the site is a well known member of the pancake lobby therefore all evidence presented no matter how legit or scientific is discredited without further consideration.

Sure, they want to corner markets and drive prices so low that they drive the competition out of business and then become indispensable. And they're hardly alone in that strategy, we've seen that before, but they really do lean into it. But that very tactic really makes it hard for them to actually pull ahead. Let me see him out of investment but they can make into improving or coming up with the next generation product and the funding its development. So far they rely very heavily on industrial information theft and copying but that leaves you a step behind and companies are beginning to protect themselves against that better