CdnFox

Ahhh. You really are that stupid and i DO have to get the crayons out Disappointing but not surprising, Well. How about we do it in something you can understand easier like Dr Seuss rhyme? Jaggers decided to sell his clan to the liberals to get a new medical plan (well also a pension, if we're being fair But that's something else so we won't go there) They promised all provinces would soon be included to our own orange man, with whom they colluded They promised that funding would grow over time And to always commit to every dime And carney the liar when running for office said "I'll keep that word, don't worry i promise!" But sadly it turns out he lied yet again His commitment to funding has come to an end. No more will provinces be asked to agree His current commitments? He says "well we'll see" "No guarantee to contine" he said Everyone knew that the program was dead. And yet once again Carney turned out a liar Which i had to explain to our stupid ExFlyer. THere. THat should be easier for you Maybe find an adult to read it to you?

They're cancelling the funding commitment as well as the extended plan they had to get all provinces on board Pay attention Nope, This was a federally applied program. and was paid for by the feds. Now, you SEEM to be arguing (without realizing it) that this was a stupid waste of money that the liberals should never have done, and those who applauded it at the time were ignorant people who don't get how this works. And in that sense you're quite right. Lib and dip supporters who thought this was a good idea were stupid. Sigh. They had a commitment to continue to fund this and to finish negotiations with the last provinces They are canceling those negotiations and have cancelled their commitment to funding. Do i need to get the crayons out for you, or can you get your head around this now?

Clearly you weren't . And it's not like it would be the first time you've cheered the terrorists. like i said, you can't cheer the terrorism and pretend you don't support the terrorists Nope. Highlight, copy and paste is all you need to do. Change the search terms if you like. well if that's all you need, then lets see them. Sorry kid, but we know you're lying. People who "Pretend" to criticize "ISREAL'S GOVT NOT JEWS" are almost always just hating on jews. No lawsuits necessary.

This was the liberals program, this was the liberals pledge, this was the liberals payment for the ndps vote Canceling it is 100% the liberals responsibility and fault

Whereas you're just a regular m0ron? And no, it's not an oxymoron. That's something different, like "bittersweet". What you appear to be trying to say is that it's contradictory. No, something can be expensive but affordable. If butter was 12 dollars a lb i'd call it very expensive but i could still afford it. No, expensive does not mean "Only the well off can afford it". That's just stupid. Epensive means it costs more than it should or more than you'd expect. It doesn't mean you can't afford it. Why am i always having to give you english lessons? Yeash,

ROFLMAO! Wow kid, you're really slipping in your comebacks

No you weren't . And where's those examples of the lawsuits? Geez, you weren't lying about that too were you?

LOL you're conservative now? You and Mike hardner eh Kid, you're a liar, you're dishonest, you support corruption, you support hamas, you don't care about the future of our country or it's children. You're as liberal as it gets

well lets take a look. Where's your example?

I'm sure that's what you tell yourself when you can't sleep at night thinking about how you got your ass handed to you again Doug ford. He launched an entire ad campaign against Trump during key midterm elections not long ago, p*ssed trump off to no end. Wow. That wasn't hard was it. Here's a little more for you. Canadian politician attacks trump during trump election for president - Google Search Several Canadian politicians—including former NDP MP Charlie Angus and Prime Minister Mark Carney—have aggressively attacked Donald Trump during his re-election campaign and subsequent presidency Wow, it sure never takes long for you to look stupid during our little talks does it More sleepless nights for you who cares? Our govt has met with organizations from other countries billions of times. Hell Harper had the Dalai lama by for a visit and that's all about the separation of Taiwan and China. Trudeau met with rebel and even terrorist groups as prime minister from other countries. "Justin Trudeau has faced multiple high-profile accusations and political controversies over alleged sympathies, meetings, or associations with individuals and groups labeled as terrorists. " trudeau accused of meeting with terrorist leaders - Google Search Oopsie, you look stupid again You don't know what you're talking about. Your whining and crying about interference when our own government does it all the time and it's no big deal If they put money in, if they pay for advertising, etc etc then it's interference but meeting with somebody is not interference Now you look like a 100% twat. Well done

sure, conservatives always put Canada first. I know that seems strange to you and your side who don't give a Flying Fig what happens to Canada as long as your own cult benefits. So Harper tosses him some advice once in a while. It's hilarious that you think somehow that being non partisan and offering help during a time of crisis for the country is some sort of 'insult' or something Goes to show how much of a cultist you are

But most don't. For the very reason I mentioned The ones that do go to court... well why don't we take a look at thiat. Post a couple of examples of what you're talking about. Should be no problem with the 'surge' you mentioned. You literally said hamas was exercising it's human rights not to be repressed in the attack on 0ct 7th. You can't support the terrorism and pretend not to support the terrorists.

You're Morally Bankrupt! Dunning Kruger!! Cognitive Dissonance! BUUUUUUUP KIIIIIIIIISSSSSSSSSSSS!!!

Yes, historically it has been very common for people on the left to try and dismiss their blatant antisemitism as merely being a criticism of government policy. It very clearly is not in most cases. Those claiming that it is almost always our anti-semites who want to pretend that somehow they're the victim

Considering your track record so far of the parties you support you're not really qualified to talk about other parties like the CPC The CPC did amazing when they were in power and we had one of the world's best economies given the world economic downturn caused by the democrats in the states and their housing bubble. Your gov't has driven Canada into the ground and the damage is generational. Kid, you don't get to say who's a useless loser, you're the poster boy.

Dude in my post right around the same time i put in FIVE links to stats proving my point precisey. And despite YOUR data as well as mine and all the links involved he's still here demanding there's no links. This isn't a rational person.

Which is exactly why carney isn't moving quickly. He knows if he waits a bit then the market conditions won't be right and then he can throw the doors open and nobody will come anyway. He doesn't want anything built he just wants people to think he wanted something built

That was amazing

LOL ahh starting off with an insult that's actually an admission of your own failings, That's your signature way of admitting you know you're wrong Love to see it I gave you dozens and did the math for you. More than once. I even gave you proof looking at it from different ways. On top of it west can gave you some proof and a couple of other people. Not to mention the fact that I drew proofs from your own links And in fact I'll do so again right now from your own link: The two main exceptions are Vancouver and Toronto where high and rising prices make it a stretch for a typical household to own a home at today’s market values,especially in the single-detached segments (the bar on condo ownership is comparatively much less of a hurdle My claim was that Vancouver was expensive but affordable. Your own link says that it was a stretch to afford a detached home but a nice townhouse or condo was much less of a hurdle. He stretch is not unaffordable. It just means it's expensive. And Townhomes, which is what I specifically mentioned. We're much more affordable You literally just proved me right. Vancouver was expensive but affordable I provided you with actual hard numbers and actual definitions and many many links, you provide one and it still proves me right Kid, you and Robo Smith are in an absolute race to see who's the dumbest person on this board and you've got everyone else lapped.

If only. There's nothing conservative about carney other than what he says. But i love that you, who support the ndp who kept these guys in power for no reason as it turns out, and you who support the liberals constantly, want to pretend that the problem is 'conservatives' LOLOL

Very true. And the problem is they will defend that position even though they had no logic or facts to derive it in the first place against all comers. If I say something and someone challenges it I generally go do a bit of reading and make sure that I'm on the right side of the facts before I continue. But they are not burdened by that kind of thinking. They just continued defending their point even in the face of facts and reason that proves that they were wrong to begin with. And I see you upset poor Exflyer, he's making his rounds doing his little "I'm really mad" downarrow thing

And the good times keep on coming Canada's economy dropped 18,000 jobs in April as unemployment rose to 6-month high | CBC News So we lost a tonne of jobs in January, a CRAP tonne of jobs in February, gained a small amount back in march and just lost ALL of those and then some. And they're predicting things will get worse. This is just Justin Trudeau 2.0. Things are no better under carney than they were under Justin

I think it's cute. Like those little kits we used to buy the kids where they could dress up and run around pretending they were a real doctor and the like Well of course I'm not one to speak about the first part being mildly dyslexic and having my voice dictation actively fight me half the time But the second part is certainly a something I would agree with 100%. It's disappointing to see how low the reasoning is. Not to pick on him but as an example linksoul was arguing the other day that life in vancouver was unaffordable in 2015. And as "proof" he made a claim about the cost of a house (turned out to be wrong but that's not the point. ) Now, a person trained to think AT ALL would realize that the cost of a house is meaningless UNLESS you also look at the wages people were earning. If people in vancouver were earning an average of 200k a year that's quite affordable if they were earning 10 k a year that's not. But it never even occurred to him that you need BOTH figures to work out what's affordable. That's SO basic, like 1st year university basic. How can you say if something's affordable without looking at how much people can afford? And we see that kind of sloppy thinking constantly. It really actually bothers me that there's such a lack of basic reasoning and logic skills

Oh I love this part! This is the part where you know I'm right and you're going to try and change the argument in the most ridiculous possible fashion so you look less stupid LOLOL Nice try kid but you just embarrassing yourself. Many of our elected officials have commented on american elections and met with members of a proposition parties and such and will likely continue to do so. In no universe is that anything remotely close to election interference and you are absolutely stupid for trying to defend it as such. Grow up, you may not be the smartest person on the board but you're certainly smarter than that. If a government starts putting money into one of the organizations then that's interference. If they send people to infiltrate those organizations or the like then that's interference. Commentary is not interference and in fact this issue was examined in depth when john Oliver claimed to be flouting a Canadian law which forbids foreign interference by demanding everyone vote for the liberals during an election and demanding that Canada come arrest him. It was explained at the time but this isn't actually what is considered to be interference. You get these ideas in your head and you defend them to the death even though they are not supportable by the facts and you really need to stop doing that. When you apply yourself you're not a bad thinker and it's disappointing to see you behaving in this fashion. You're not Robo Smith for God's sake

No deal was necessary to begin with. You're actually beginning to realize the truth. And actually the feds would have done vastly more good with vastly less money by just augmenting funding to the existing programs This was about optics. This was about the appearance of the trudeau government making things better for Canadians when it wasn't for the NDP to look like they were getting something for their blind subservience to the liberal cause which they didn't This was never about benefiting Canadians and was completely unnecessary. Now Carney's looking at the books and realizing that he can't afford to expand programs that won't actually produce results. The whole thing was in a massive waste. The funny thing is for the money they were looking at setting aside for it they could have bought private insurance like people have with their work for literally every single Canadian who didn't have work coverage currently and it would have included medical and dental. This is why we're broke in our country is in ruin