CdnFox

Well that's the challenge isn't it. If a male did it then sure it's indecent exposure. probably sexual harrassment, staring at naked girls in the shower has to be worth a few charges too - society recognizes it's wrong. But - all you have to do is yell "trans!" and that alllll goes away. No crime at all committed. Not even exposure. It's all above board with just one word.

Sure kid. The liberals are totally right wing. As in most. See? You resort to lies, and try to play games, and you wonder why nobody thinks of you as anything but a blowhard snake oil peddler. The left - ALL the left, would like to ban guns and for the most part - most guns. And if we've learned anything once they've banned one gun they'll want to ban another. For them its like lays chips - you can't ban just one. And your dishonesty is a prime example of why nothing will happen on the mass shooting front. Nobody can afford to try to do a deal with the left - they lie and always want more.

Yes! Except no. Leftists want to ban guns. Even as we speak biden is calling for a gun ban. But i'm sure they'd lie about it if they thought it would get them closer to a gun ban THis is why the right wing doesn't give them a millimeter - you lie about your agenda and you can't be trusted - so it's easier to just never even consider anything you say on the matter knowing you're full of it to begin with.

Well that's the end of it then. Parents can buy books for their kids that represent such things if they feel up to explaining it to them. Problem solved - we dont need it taught in schools by your own admission. Not really. They depict mommy and daddy. Kids know there's a mommy and a daddy. They don't really know that mommy and daddy have sex or how that relationship works. They're not depicting heterosexuality, they're depicting a family unit in the way that 99 percent of kids can understand without further questions. Sure. it's come up in canada a lot but here's some from the states https://nypost.com/2021/12/22/how-public-schools-brainwash-young-kids-with-harmful-transgender-ideology/ "Children — as young as 5 — are being encouraged to disregard their anatomy and choose their gender based on their feelings." There's a shit tonne of thsi out there - easy to find with a simple look And kids are being encouraged to take gender altering medical treatments at very young ages. Even doctors are becoming concerned. And i love how you blew off the rest But thanks for admitting it. Sure if you like. but 99 percent of kids will accept they have a mommy and a daddy before they ever get to school. THey don't know that mommy and daddy are 'heterosexual' - or what heterosexual means. THey just know they have a mommy and a daddy. Or in some cases one or the other. Pot - meet kettle. Or don't talk to them about issues they're not ready for. Pretty simple. Like i said, we don't discuss sexual kinks with kids either. You don't have kids obviously. But - if what you say is true then whats' the point of worrying about it. THey're obviously not ready. Leave it till they are LOL _ i always know you've realized you've failed when the pictures come out

well he didn't scratch his OWN back. If you haven't dealt with autistic children then just let it go. You'll wind up saying something out of ignorance that wont' be accurate. Moderately functioning autistics can still attend school and such but are very easy to confuse, they tend to focus on things so much that it's VERY easy to jump them, when they panic they lose the ability to take in their surroundings nearly as well, this is why they often wind up getting lost. Ok - well you unplug mentally if you need to. Doesn't feel like that here. Smollets story was implausable from the get go, and had all the hallmarks of a written script. THe hajib thing had a few flaws but honestly that COULD have happened. Investigations found out otherwise, but that could easily have been true. Such things have happened. This - we'll see but i'm not surprised there isn't more info. Happens more frequently than you'd think. Calling it mutlialtion is quite a stretch - looks like someone scratched him with a protractor or the like. Why would a principle say that. And it's far from the most vile attacks in our country. Hell isn't today the anneversary of when a bunch of people got killed being run over by a truck deliberately? Anyway, we'll see.

Well - without facts nether of us can speak absoltuely (and i don't feel like looking it up on canlii right now) But - i'm still not sure why it seems excessive. He interferes with a cop, to the point where he gets charged, and then he demands as a legal defense that the court admit it has no authority. ANd once you put that forward as a legal statement then the court has to agree or disagree, there's no in between. I think the judge was being kind by dinging him for a year only for those things. interfering with a police investigation alone could net you that. But on top of it all what he was doing was sedition, and that's not ok either. But we can agree to disagree if you really feel that was excessive. I think it's defensible legally but whether it should be is an opinion. I'm happy enough to see such 'free men' learn that they are not in fact above the law.

So they aren't and you've realized that and you'd like to move along. Fair enough. But they didn't. A handful tried and failed and that was the end of it. So what's your point? So use other id. Are you telling me college people don't carry any other id? They don't have drivers licesnse or state id or the like? What do people who DON"T go to college carry? it sure as hell wouldn't be official id in Canada either but university kids still vote in droves. Again - are you worried that the extra id will make it too hard to walk to the voting booth? Who gives a shit? With mail in voting and advanced polls and such it's a null issue. And if they change the time go at that time. Are you now suggesting they don't have watches or iphones? And we have ALL of that in Canada and yet we have good voter turn out, BETTER on average than the states. So it's a complete lie to claim this stuff 'suppresses ' the vote.

Keep in mind i know CONSIDERABLY more than you and am actually extremely well versed on the issue. I believe i said they wanted to ban guns, which isn't the same thing, They might be ok with people owning single shot rifles. Or flintlocks i suppose. Hard to say. Did you have reason to believe otherwise? Certainly not the link you provided.

What isn't? human sexuality and relationships are complex. Like i said we don't teach kids about sexual fetishes or furries. We don't really even teach them about hetero relationships - we just don't go our of our way to hide them. WE don't have 'straight story time". SO you'd be happy with that? If teachers mentioned that once and that was the end of it? Nope - you want to have drag story time, you want to have discussions about gay relationships and couples, you want to discuss gender and have them make decisions about their own gender and whether they need surgery before their age even reaches double digits. Fact is - they'll learn that some kids have two moms or dads on their own. If that's all you wanted there would be no need to discuss this. Well then their parents can mention that to them and we're done here right? Right? Antifa? WE're done right? Uhhh ohhhh - looks like you lied. You want more than that. And you know it's a lie. Kids have follow up questions. "Why do they do that?" well. because they love each other. "but - why do you love daddy then and not another mommie" well... Some people are just like that "But why? I love my daddy don't they want to have a daddy?" Look kid ... it's complicated... hey, want to watch frozen again? You obviously don't have children. If you think for a moment that it's simple or that it stops at a single sentence you're very wrong. Well not a prince - two dads is fine but nobody has two kings LOL Probably would bomb in the box office if it was for children, for the reason i mentioned. Parents don't take their kids to a disney movie so that they can spend the next 4 hours explaining human relationships and sexuality - they take them for easy to digest simple entertainment. But sure - i'm sure disney could make a slightly more adult movie about gay relationships, IF i'ts a good story. If it makes the story work well. If it's just shoe horning it in for the SAKE of making a movie about gay people then it pisses people off. THat's what happened to star wars and has hurt other franchises. When you make something woke for the sake of being woke, it pisses people off. When you tell a good story for the sake of telling a good story, people don't care if it's got gays in it or how many actors are women or black or whatever. Bullshit. They haven't leaned on 'trans' at all and that had nothing to do with the midterms. None - because there isn't one. That's just the voices in your head again. And i wouldn't expect it would do well. People are DONE with this discussion. They're fed up. They don't want to talk about trans people anymore. THey're sick of them. If someone proposes a law that they have to SHUT UP they might get some traction. As bud how the whole 'talking about trans issues' thing is going for them.

Yep - denial isn't healthy. The majority of people who ger rich come from low to middle class backgrounds. Repeating a lie just makes you look stupid. Again yet - the data shows that of the people who are rich - the poor and middle class are the MAJORITY I've addressed that point a dozen times now. Again - if all you have to bring to the table is lies, why would anyone take you seriously. Sure it is. Certainly the way you mean it. THere's no running. People all have the same amount of opportunity period. Not necessarily the same opportunities, but the same number of paths to success - anyone in America can make it to at least high middle class. Period. Every single time if they do the right things. I might by that poor people don't realize this or don't know what the rigth things are and have said i'm all over seeing them mentored and educated in that, but that's the fact. Your problem is you need everyone to be a victim except the people you don't like. But its a lie.

The kid is autistic. Depending on how far along the spectrum they may have felt he'd be an easy target that would have a more difficult time saying who did it. If they jumped him from behind in the washroom or change room he probably didn't see.

Relax - it's not possilbe they could have used a banned gun so we just have to check the registry for restricteds and we'll find out who did it. Of course we'll also let them out 10 mins later but still we'll know who it was, so .... closure!

No, that's just stupid. They're not making it any harder to vote by you having to show id. That's just as easy. Seriously - how is that "harder"? It isn't. Everyone can carry ID. In canada we've had that requirement for decades. I mean - how would it make it harder? "Cant,,, walk... to ... voting .... station.. with the extra.... weight.... of ... this ...id! (passes out). What they're doing is trying to shut down avenues of voter fraud. You don't give a flying fig about democracy and have complained about it here every time it's inconvenient for you. It's "Bad" for you because "republican". I could have a note from god saying it's a great thing and you'd still say it was bad.

The amount the NRA actually donates is pretty small in american terms. The voters are the real issue, republican voters and even some 'red liberals' (in the states) consider it to be a very serious voting matter.

Of course it is. And lying about it just makes your motive seem suspect, which isn't helping your case. Well then there you go. As to the rest of your nonsense the right wing is reacting to the lefts unreasonable attitudes and grooming. Leave them alone and they'll leave you alone. And kids will grow up seeing that some parents have two mommies and that some girls used to be boys, and nobody will care much. I have tried to tell you many times, the evidence is pretty clear that this isn't just some far right republicans - this is a major backlash that is considerably larger than what polls suggest the number of transphobic people would be. This is a backlash against the politics, and it only gets worse.

I'm so sorry. i would never do that intentionally

I know - i hear they won't even CONSIDER letting you shoot your three year old either, EVEN IF HE DREW ON THE WALL! Screw the states and human rights a;ways wanting to penalize people for murder, amirite? There's a number of problems with your statement. The first is If it really is a baby (ie a human) then we don't kill it. We don't kill human beings, period. We don't kill them in the womb we don't kill them out of the womb. Once it's a baby, a little human being, then you're not allowed to kill it even if you really want to. We can discuss when it goes from a fetus to a human, but once that happens you're basically crying that we don't allow child murder. Not much of an argument. So if the state has determined a point where it's a child, then so be it. Second - you can always go to another state where they arrived at a different conclusion. Sure you may have to drive for a few hours but presumably you won't be doing that very often. If you are then you have other issues to consider. Third - the state can't tell you anything that the people didn't first tell the state. If you don't like the laws vote in a different gov't who's willing to look at it differently. If the public won't do that, then you have to respect the democratic process a little and realize i'ts not the state, its the people. Now i happen to disagree with this law as noted but lets not pretend that there isn't some legitimacy to determining a date where you wont' allow abortions after.

Honestly it's just hard to beat that combo. My neighbour comes over for a coffee just about every day because i make it that way and he can't stand his wife's coffee

Truth and facts aren't their thing. They run on fear and anger. Those two things are incredibly motivating for humans and fear and anger have been tools for manipulating the public for millenia. Get the public mad about something or afraid of something and it's EASY to get them to either take action or to give you unprecedented power to take action. ANd then they will claim YOU are the one who's afraid and angry - because then they can dismiss any argument you make as just being the fear and anger talking. They are the ultimate snake oil peddlers and holy relic sellers.

Also obstructed the police. That was part of the sentencing too.

No no - we should just ignore all crimes. That makes more sense. Why have laws in the first place? What's the point of a constitution? Why should anyone have rights? Do away with it all - lets see how that goes for us. You're retarded.

So you haven't heard of this 'constitution' thing? Putin is smiling at you - he doesn't think people have rights either, just as you demand they don't.

He committed real acts. Obstructing a police officer is a real act. Sedition is a real act. What's next? If you're argument is that we shoudn't punish criminals then you can try to make that, but good luck. Well you seem to be more like putin than me so you'll have to tell me. But - the fact is that if you committ a crime in Canada you face punishment. ANd you still haven't explained why he shouldn't other than to repeat faleshoods and to try a few insults. Now - do you have a real argument or are you just a m0ron?

judge did - now its' up to you to explain why you feel he's wrong. This is sedition. Sedition is a very serious crime and deserves severe punishment. Saying that the judges SHOULDN"T have power is dissent.

Yes - in the face of your stupidity all i can do is laugh Only a child thinks i did. you think you get a real education at college? No wonder you're wrong so often When you grow up and graduate from high school, your mommy will help you pick something better unless you want to do a trade, which is fine too.