robosmith

It is what Trump did, which is keeping him in court. Duh We know YOU MAGA CULT fanboys like to IGNORE THE EVIDENCE, but the RULE OF LAW says YOU CANNOT. If you can't do the time, DON'T DO THE CRIME. Because the SDNY was under Trump's thumb when they turned down the case against Trump.

Reasons. AKA what Trump is PROMISING he'll do. Duh Donald Trump on What His Second Term Would Look Like Time Magazine https://time.com · 4 days ago In exclusive interviews, the former President lays out a second-term agenda that would reshape America and its role in the world.

Joe was not in office. He was completely free to do business with China at that time. Not that he did nor your cite even says he did. Just like Kushner got a $2BILLION payoff from MBS after he got kicked out of the WH. IOW, STILL BUPKIS.

We have a radical democracy. Will Trump voters destroy it? I'm guessing too many HERE will NOT, but fortunately many of them are Canadian and cannot vote for Trump. LMAO

Gee, it doesn't even says it's RELATED TO CHINA. Did you just IMAGINE that one? LMAO Are you also imagining that Joe's business dealings when HE'S OUT OF OFFICE, are anyone else's business? IOW, you got BUPKIS.

^This. When I knew gas prices would go up years ago when they were temporarily low (Dec 2016), I bought a hybrid which gets almost twice the MPG of my Civic. And I got a great deal cause no one wanted them when gas was so low. And I use an app called Fiipp on my phone that tells me all the sale prices for groceries in my town. As a result, I almost never pay the inflated prices that dumb posters here complain about.

I gave your post enough thoughtful consideration to search your cited link looking for EXPERT corroboration and didn't find ANY. And I posted data and a graph to show you that your trickle response was IN ERROR. MAYBE you can explain the difference that ^this response made to the LACK of expert corroboration of overuse of ventilators causing deaths. My mom was on a ventilator for 6 months and didn't die until she CHOSE to remove it.

Your detachment from reality has been ridiculous for a LONG TIME. Including your denial of rain during Trump's inauguration speech and PRETENSE that LIE was actually true, and refusal to acknowledge the LOGICAL FALLACY of your CLAIM that ALL 30,000+ Trump lies are disproven by your FAILURE to prove that one alleged LIE is in FACT PROVEN ACCURATE. In case you're having trouble deciphering ^this, ALL 30,000+ Trump LIES are STILL on the table, since you've not proven ANY OF THEM inaccurate.

You are correct. I completely forgot about your attempt to claim your graph was faulty, and my post which confirmed that it WAS NOT. I don't believe you ever responded to that second post, so here it is again:

All you need to understand is "the experts know IS BS" Do you understand now? LMAO

You got any peer reviewed journal articles about ^this? All I see in your link is random Interwebz BS. BTW, you never responded to my comments on your graph in the "trickle" thread. Is that because you're too embarrassed that you interpreted the meaning of the graph wrong?

^Makes stupid assumptions and childish name calling cause you got nothing better. 🤮 How old are you? I'm guessing under 13.

YOUR IGNORANCE and ARROGANCE knows no bounds, cause you IMAGINE you know BS that the experts know IS BS. Is Yakuda Swahili for BULLSHITER? LMAO

Really? When people can't breath, they die without ventilators. Like my friend's brother who spent 2 weeks in the ICU on a ventilator and was one of the lucky 20% who survived COVID. And my mom who had pneumonia which destroyed her lungs and only lived because of a ventilator for the last 6 months of her life. Where do you get the idea that ventilators kill people?

It's easy for you to post bullshit but impossible for you to prove it. We're already paying for the spending passed, it's just coming from MORE expensive borrowing instead of pay as we go thanks to Republicon record tax CUTS. Too bad your random statistics don't "refute" jack.

The answer is in the DATA I posted. You posted nothing but TRIPLING DOWN on STUPID DENIAL and FAILURE to understand. Excess mortality is science and DATA. It's no wonder that you can't understand it. LMAO I can lead you to knowledge but I can't make you THINK.

Saving the economy from disastrous unnecessary collapse, saves LIVES. It's NOT ego, it's a matter of preventing unnecessary suffering by MILLIONS just to serve your IDEOLOGY. Got a clue for you; businessmen know how to manage debt without long term damage. The problem comes when people like Karl Rove and Trump start believing they can magically create a "permanent Republican majority" by goosing an economy that is already at near full capacity utilization. Meanwhile Democrats do is to prevent collapse of an economy which is crashing. See Obama and the Great Recession and Biden and the pandemic near collapse. Both caused under Republicans and saved by Democrats. IOW, your libertarian IDEOLOGY has blinded you to pragmatism.

No, exactly what I said: Murdock TABLOID TRASH. AKA has NO credibility. But you believe National Enquirer, doncha. Politico (above) has the real story. Duh Your stupid predictions are PATHETIC and you post it cause you got nothing intelligent to say.

Cons only believe in banning free speech when it's THEIR OX being gored.

Their losses are miniscule and SHORT TERM, which you would know if you actually checked the DATA. Inbev's losses were not due to any BULLSHIT "woke," they were due to lDIOTS boycotting which only affected a small percentage of their sales. Anyone who believes Bud is good beer is too stupid to know better about anything else.

Or we can just raise taxes on high incomes that were cut by Trump. And/or tax wealth on multi-billionaires that pay very little Federal taxes due to token income.

Sorry you don't win debates nor provide EVIDENCE because you're too lazy to post anything more than a link. I'm not going to search your link in the off chance there MIGHT be something relevant there. You've already ruined your credibility and I'm not going on a fools errand again. Quote content or lose.

Naked links are any link that does not include a quote of relevant content. Try again.

IF you have a case, quote it here. I'm not clicking on your naked links cause you've lost all credibility, like I told you before.

Your naked links are unpersuasive. IF they say something of substance addressing the issue, quote it HERE. Do you have any idea how debate works? You don't get points of completely obscure responses.