TreeBeard

The court dismissed a defamation suit. Why isn’t this a victory for free speech? ?

This is an odd headline considering that the ruling upholds the “woke” people’s speech and threw out the case against them by the person who felt offended. It’s like the OP didn’t read their own article, or the ruling. The OP seems to say, “I want free speech, but I also want the person using the offending speech to be sued if they’re woke”. (In fairness I couldn’t read the article due to paywall) https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/supreme-court-of-canada-barry-neufeld-glen-hansman-defemation-suit-decision-1.6849071

Yes, because they’re written many centuries apart.

The KJV says bats are birds. Leviticus 11 13 And these are they which ye shall have in abomination among the fowls; they shall not be eaten, they are an abomination: the eagle, and the ossifrage, and the ospray, 14 And the vulture, and the kite after his kind; 15 Every raven after his kind; 16 And the owl, and the night hawk, and the cuckow, and the hawk after his kind, 17 And the little owl, and the cormorant, and the great owl, 18 And the swan, and the pelican, and the gier eagle, 19 And the stork, the heron after her kind, and the lapwing, and the bat.

So, God changed his mind about killing gay people when it comes to Christians. God said to the Israelites “kill the gays”, but for the Christians, he changed his mind about it.

I don’t think you read the ruling… The court threw out the case of Neufeld suing Hansman for something Hansman said. So, if you’re a free speech absolutist, as you claim to be, you should like this ruling.

So, it’s still ok to kill gay men, as God commanded? Or, did God command an immoral act (killing) to be done? Leviticus 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Did you quote a lot of bible passages in your email?

Does God change his mind about what’s moral?

The last election, it was 33% Libs to 34% Cons. Now, according to Canada338.com, it is 31% Libs, 35% Cons (+/-4%). Where is all this increased support you speak of? 1% every 2 years, PP will be in majority government territory in 2032. Unfortunately for him, his party changes leaders like people change socks.

I’m glad you would love your gay married neighbours and wish them to be treated equally to the straight married neighbours!

It’s a question. When you see one of these: ? It means the words form a question, not a statement.

Why are all your posts so sh!tty?

He indicted 3, but all were quickly found not guilty. There doesn’t seem to be any further charges forthcoming, so…. Where’s the beef, so to speak??

We probably did fund them. But, isn’t that why they’re being investigated now?

So, someone with darker skin than you has less value?

So you consider Canada a “white homeland”. What makes it one? You think it’s the colour of one’s skin that determines their worth?

I don’t understand …. is this you trying to soften a racist stance, or what? I don’t know what a “bogus mixed race” is, nor how skin colour can be a political statement. I also don’t know what a “race statement” is.

He didn’t. You don’t know how the Emergencies Act works.

The PM has no power to declare a state of emergency! LOL Now you’re just being a troll.

Parliament can vote him out. The courts can throw him out. No dictatorship. The PM doesn’t control the military in Canada, and doesn’t even control the police. Court order would send in the RCMP to arrest his ass. Your dystopian future is a fantasy. Tell me…. What could the monarch do if he declared himself a dictator? Send in British troops? LOL

Parliament. Courts. In that order. What a silly question.

Doesn’t sound very useful.

More democracy = no monarch

People in the military want more money to be spent on the military. Shocking. I bet bridge builders think we should build more bridges too!