Jump to content

Jean-Kevin

Members
  • Posts

    56
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Jean-Kevin's Achievements

Contributor

Contributor (5/14)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

4

Reputation

  1. I don't imagine myself to be this fuckwit. Otherwise, these stories related to the coronavirus don't interest me. I was vaccinated but I wasn't charged and I don't care about the news made in conspiracy.com. I'm more interest about cybercrime, mind control, harassment, road hazards, aggressions because it is the present dangers that I find more problematic.
  2. In a French-speaking Youtube video called " Les dérives d'INSTAGRAM (Arnaques etc..) " posted by LE ROI DES RATS we have an individual who tried instagram pretending to be a 13 year old girl (because since there is public advertissement and stars who go on instagram, parents believe that it is a social network of relative danger and maybe it is a good idea to send their kids on instagram). It's a social network that scams (it makes fakes, makes you believe that you can win a lot of money easily if you join the scheme, etc., only to have your money stolen), there is conterfeith, There are false advertisements to charge for things that will never reach the buyer. All this can be enough to not have the foolishness to go on instagram except that it goes further than that since an incalculable number of pedophiles go instagram to catch kids.
  3. A real crap. In the subway I saw an Instagram advertissement, there are famous people who go there or have gone there which makes more advertissements, I came across an advertisement in a Youtube video today that offers to sell things on Instagram. Instagram is not a social networking famous like 4Chan where there is a blinking sign warning that you are in a troll box where all cybercriminals are welcome. Instagram is the world of illusion, the tyranny of cool. Glad to know that I won't be part of the badgers who fell into this shit.
  4. I believe he is a member of the alt right. Trump seems to me to follow an ideology common to Richard Spencer. It seems to me that Milo Yiannopoulos was in the same team to help Trump to win the presidential elections by political trolling. Plenty of fake or false news against Hilary Clinton would have been made in order to increase Trump's chances to reach power. Trump would be eco-septic and his right-hand man a creationist.
  5. I think the real problem it is above all an execrable mentality. if I caricature incel's mentality to what I think I understand : 1) 🧑(mentality of a regular man) : - Oh excuse me ! I didn't see you, it's ok, I didn't hurt you. 💩 (mentality of an incel man) : - Oh I excuse you ! Fortunately I'm fine but next time watch where you're going, I don't want to hurt myself. 2) 🧑(mentality of a regular man) : - Dear sexologist, I have a problem, I can't get a hard-on and I ask for your help to solve my psychological problem. 💩 (mentality of an incel man) : - Miss sexologist, my girlfriend have a problem, she can't get my d..k hard and see what needs to be done to solve her problem.
  6. A Youtuber just makes a youtube video and if a lot people like or they intererest by these videos they watch and the Youtuber can become famous. To what I think I understand, incel is an involuntary celibate and in theorie he doesn't look for the love but to have sexual rapport and as he doesn't necessarily have a rapist's mentality he can take a direction of women killer. (the incels who aren't killers or make acts of misogyny are ignored because probably they don't salesmen or interest politics )
  7. There seems to be a famous YouTuber that people call the King of Incels. This individual is named or called Elliot Rodger and he killed women : There seems to be another famous YouTuber who is incel that the newspaper Le Monde call Jake Davidson or Professeur Waffle. The newspaper Le Monde said this : ... An "incel", a recent expression in the Anglo-Saxon world, is an involuntary celibate, a man who has no success with women and ends up hating them - a character like in the novels of Houellebecq. Nothing but the ordinary, you might say. Unfortunately, in the last few years, the "incel" has become more radical and has turned his failures in love into a fight, his resentment into a torch, and women into his hereditary enemies - an attitude that is increasingly asserted, accompanied by an outpouring of misogynistic hatred on the American and Canadian Internet. The Urban Dictionary, the wikidictionary that records new living language in the English-speaking world, gives a disturbing definition of the radical incel: "An incel thinks his lack of sex life is because he is 'ugly' when it is just caused by his blatant sexism and terrible behavior. An incel has a horrible personality and treats women like sex objects. Incels have no self-awareness (...)".
  8. Ok so there is this video which is valid for all languages : because if we try to go to a higher level than the intermediate level whether it is English, French or any other language it becomes difficult or very difficult. The opinion French is difficult or another language is difficult doesn't make much sense at high levels.
  9. It's a strange question and notably people feel special because they aren't in the social norm. Sometime you believe you are someone special because you are different from others. What is it to be someone special ? Is it something positive or negative ?
  10. Yes and I think is bad idea to speak in French or any language other than English. There is traductor google ( Google Traduction ) can help if we have difficulties with the English language. Apart from the fact that it's becoming ridiculous to have multilingual topics, there is the problem that the French language is difficult as far as spelling is concerned and it is likely that the translators are not programmed to translate French with spelling mistakes which will create closed discussions.
  11. English grammar is not so easy, for example I'm sure I make a lot of grammatical mistakes when I write (and I also use a translator so in some cases it can be the translator who makes the grammar mistake). Do I have to put as or like ? Do I have to put do or make ? Do I have to put an evidence or a piece of evidence ? Then it is necessary to look if the French-speakers don't make the errors of grammar because if they themselves make full of it the relevance of the difficulty isn't any more the same one since in a case we speak about a grammar which would be simpler about English but the English-speakers don't make almost any error.
  12. There are many reasons but I don't think is this the reason. I think that wolves can attack humans, can be dangerous to humans and that this animal can become a symbol of fear that humans have created a myth, a scary movie story. In terms of justice, yes, or at least I assume that if someone kills someone in my family, I'll go to the trial not only to make sure he will be condemned but also to know or have an idea of the motive behind the crime. For the history for example I would like to know the motive of the crimes committed by the Jön Türkler against the Armenians. Are these political reasons related to the Islamic religion or not ? It seems to me that Erdogan has already rewritten history on this subject and so if I were Turkish I would know the story that is being sold to me in Turkey which may be the story of a political trickery exploiting history. It is easier to manipulate irrational people than rational ones and the concept of divinity goes with the concept of the divine law, of the last judgment with a place of torture, a horrible thing reserved for those who have not submitted to the right doctrine. Apart from religion, there are political (see the story of Lysenko) and economic (fake news on the net are made for reasons related to money)
  13. (FYI : I think French or many languages are more difficult than English because English is a useful language to learn even if you don't live in an English-speaking country whereas French and other languages may have no or very little use) 1) You- formel or informel His first argument is irrelevant because if the person isn't a French-speaker, no French-speakers care about that. The important thing to do is to say "tu" (you singular) when it concerns one person and to say "vous" (you plural) when it concerns more than one person (two, three, four etc. persons). Language is a communication tool and the important thing is to be able to make yourself understood and when it is not your mother language, you must avoid that the person who listens to you is in the confusion, the doubt to know if he understands what you want to say. 2) "on" (that means we in majority of cases) This is not really a difficulty. When French-speaker says on you translate by we and then in some cases you guess that when he says on/we he means "I". It is not because there are exceptions, special cases, etc. that one should drown in them. When I watch a movie in English, they talk fast, the few times I was able to chat with an English-speaker he also talks fast. The French-speaker is same, he doesn't talk at a snail's pace. It means you don't have time to ask yourself if when he says "on" it is we, I, it, you, they or drown yourself in technical stuff. 3) Pronunciation I find it is not a difficulty, it is a question of knowledge and you have google translate who gives the pronunciation. English is really much more difficult, already how you pronounce simple words like "can", "later", "bottle" ? American or English prononciation ? It's a big joke the pronunciation in the French language compared to the English language 4) Accents I'd misunderstood... but there is no point in talking about writing and how a word is pronounced in writing because a language is first of all oral communication. If you are good at writing and bad at speaking, you are always at the beginner level of the language, while the opposite is no longer at the beginner level.
  14. There is a linguistic confusion. science means just knowledge so History is a science because it transmits a knowledge. The problem is that when we talk about science we're talking about something that has to do with the scientific method. If I talk about paleontology it is based on something more serious than history, we need only compare the evidence for the existence of non-avian dinosaurs with the evidence for the existence of Jesus to be convined of this. For Hitler it is a near history, there are plenty of documents, videos, photos, radios, newspapers ... in short, plenty of elements to get a less subjective idea of what happened or not. Afterwards, as for the "history of now", there are also false or fake news, disinformation. For other it is a distant history where there are few elements is when we ask for the sources, the elements of proof we have the feeling that we made us a good joke when they answer us the testimony, a book... The history about Noah's ark seems to me a little too grotesque to be swallowed but in the meantime we can still say that this ark was not found on Mount Ararat or said in another way that it is not a discovery if it isn't the discovery of the existence of fake news or of the lie.
×
×
  • Create New...