BeaverFever

CNN amd NBC just report things you don’t like. That’s not at all the same as the fabricated lies from the Republican ecosystem such as: Obama birther lies Obamacare “death panel” lies Obama “socialist reeducation camp” lies Pizzagate child trafficking lies Literally anything QAnon crackpots have said they appeared over the past decade Literally anything Alex Jones has ever said Literally anything Rush Limbaugh has ever said 2020 stolen election lies including 2000 mules and the claim that the vice president can simply refuse to certify elections at his personal whim George Soros has a space-based magnifying glass that he uses to start forest fires Paul Pelosi attack was due to a male escort he hired and refused to pay Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11 and had mobile intercontinental ballistic missile launchers armed with WMD that could strike the USA in as little as 45 minutes The 2008 financial crisis happened because of a secret law that forces banks to lend unlimited amounts of money to unqualified black people Abortion means giving birth to live healthy babies and then euthanizing them Women have late-term abortions simply because “it’s bikini season” Lies about people murdered by the Clintons An of course the topic of the OP, that JT is the son of Fidel Castro Lies by Republicans claiming they have no recollection of any of the above or that “it wasn’t a left-right thing, everyone including Democrats believed those things just as much too” or that is was just a sarcastic comment or a joke I mean I could just go on and on Worse, they made fake Electoral certificates and filed dozens of fake lawsuits to try and steal the 2020 election. They do believe it and it’s plausible if not quite yet possible given his track record and what the scumbags who surround him have said. He’s already got the Supreme Court and all he would need is a congressional majority. We know his supporters will never turn on him no matter what y they’ll go along with whatever flimsy excuse he offers for doing so. So your excuse here is that he’s not a liar he’s just stupid? There is no basis’s in fact for this claim, it’s clearly a lie. Repeating something that know to be a lie or ought to know makes you a liar. To be fair I don’t think Trump makes much of a distinction between truth a lies or really cares. There are ideas and claims that are useful to him and things that are not. He wants people believing more of the former and less of the latter, what’s true or not doesn’t really matter much to him. We see this behaviour with Trump supporters as well ehen they’re spreading lies online. That’s the way you wish it was. To paraphrase bible verse, you criticize the speck in your neighbour’s eye while ignoring the plank in your own eye.

Exactly. You only want to ‘pwn the livs”. Nothing more. You think any unoriginal generic insult of the “libs” is “hilarious” no matter how vulgar, inaccurate. Meanwhile you think that even the mildest retort from libs is an outrage A few examples of Republican fallacies : Calling Obama and Hillary N-gger and B-tch: perfectly reasonable and normal nothing to see here Calling the people who say those above things “deplorable”: Conservative outrage and pearl-clutching, their supposedly virgin ears have have never heard such awful language Predicting the Trump regime will try to retain power in 2028: lie Predicting Obamacare will require citizens stand before “death panels”: honest Altering a NOAA weather map with an ink pen just so you can claim a minor error in your tweet was correct: honest

Lol no way. Trump rolls out a new lie every time he speaks and the Republicans operate an entire disinformation ecosystem that spans the entire spectrum from Trump to Republicans politicians, pundits, right wing media and online influencers and trolls. And Republicans have been doing it for a long, long time. Decades in fact. No it’s actually not the definition of a lie, maybe you should look that up. Its a prediction of what will happen if Trump becomes president. A prediction even if it doesn’t come true by definition is NOT a lie. And it’s not entirely baseless given Trump’s repeated statements about being dictator on day 1, people won’t have to vote again, suggesting he “deserves” more than 2 terms etc. Not to mention many of those online trolls and influencers have called for him to remain president. And again if predictions are lies then the Republicans still take the cake they’re the party of hysterical predictions Remember when Republicans said Obama was going to forcibly subject people to “government run death panels?” and “socialist reeducation camps?” Oh so now suddenly stating something that is false is “technically” not a lie? The only possible technicality could be he meant it as a joke but of course he gives no indication of that. Thats one of the many ways conservatives spread lies: they “put out there” some false claim but then refuse to confirm or deny whether they meant it seriously or not. Obviously, they’re hoping the lie takes hold. Secondly, as far as jokes go it’s a pretty old one that conservatives in Canada have been circulating for years. You only think it’s “hilarious” is because you support trump and hate Trudeau. Methinks that if Trump had so much as told the oldest of knock-knock jokes, you would still have proclaimed it “hilarious”. It’s always been clear that your judgment of events is based “who” did something rather than “what” they actually did. The left isn’t “losing it’s mind”. This is just another of the thousands of Trump lie checks that have occurred in recent years. Trump is a habitual liar and lies need to be called out and corrected each and every time.

Except the helicopter ride was 2018 not 1997 and it was actually with California governor Jerry Brown (a white guy) not Willie Brown on the helicopter along with governor elect Gavin Newsom although that flight was uneventful and there was no emergency landing. Meanwhile California State Senator Nate Holden (who is black but looks nothing like Brown) recalls a helicopter flight he took with Trump and Trump’s late brother in the ‘90s where there was turbulence and a precautionary landing. However that has nothing to do with Brown nor Harris. Sounds like Trump’s stories are getting all mixed up yet again and then adds his lies and embellishments on top of that.

Or maybe had a crisis of conscience. The Bush regime’s fabricated justification for invading Iraq was clearly a massive fraud that needlessly killed and maimed thousands of US military personnel and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians Then again as others have pointed out he left the military more than a year before his unit deployed to Iraq and did so to run for congress. So it seems the war had nothing to do with it after all.

Yes.

Well it seems he just decided he was not going to Iraq for the fraudulent unnecessary war the Bush White House had concocted and that he’d had enough of the military. Since his dad wasn’t rich enough to bribe a doctor for a forged diagnosis of bone spurs like draft-dodging Trump did, or get him assigned to a do-nothing “Champagne Squadron” full of spoiled rich kids like draft-evading George W Bush, he simply retired without completing the training courses required for his rank so was demoted to his previous rank.

The man famously doesn’t read anything. Most of the policies he takes credit for are are really the policies of others And most of the policies that actually come from him are actually just half-baked rantings of a know-nothing which his staff either have to either work to transform into something coherent or distract him from. For example Trump’s suggestion on injecting disinfectant to cure covid. At the press conference his staffer responded with something like “We will definitely look into that Mr president” while managing to keep a straight face but I assure you nobody followed up on that one. Anyway, if Trump’s elected the Project 2025 people will be in the White House and they will pursue their agenda. Trump’s obvious lie that he doesn’t know these people isn’t fooling anyone. But anyway Trump’s actual official agenda must be written by project 2025 people because it’s highly similar Trump Busted Cozying Up to Extremist Leader He Claims to Not Know Donald Trump insists he knows nothing about Project 2025 or who is behind it, but a newly revealed photo indicates otherwise. Donald Trump has spent weeks trying to disavow Project 2025 since it became clear just how deeply unpopular the christo-nationalist agenda is among American voters. He even went as far as to claim that he knew “nothing about Project 2025” after the leader of the group organizing it, Heritage Foundation president Kevin Roberts, called for a “bloodless” revolution. But new evidence shows that Trump did know about the plan—and Roberts—as early as April 2022, when the two were photographed on a private flight together, smiling. “I personally have talked to President Trump about Project 2025,” Roberts told The Washington Post that month, “because my role in the project has been to make sure that all of the candidates who have responded to our offer for a briefing on Project 2025 get one from me.” Trump and Roberts took that flight, which the Heritage Foundation had chartered, from Trump’s home in Palm Beach, Florida, to the annual Heritage Foundation conference on the state coast. Trump was the conference’s keynote speaker. “They’re going to lay the groundwork and detail plans for exactly what our movement will do,” Trump said in his speech. …The two share political philosophies and key allies, including former Trump advisers Stephen Miller and John McEntee. In fact, at least 140 Trump staffers currently work for Project 2025. And as much as Trump wants to distance himself from the apparatus, Project 2025 has been thoroughly involved in staffing a future Trump presidency: Roberts has claimed the project has already “trained and vetted” more than 10,000 people to replace executive branch employees should the presumptive GOP presidential candidate win in November. But they may have more on the way—in November, Trump allies claimed they were looking to install as many as 54,000 pre-vetted Trump loyalists to the executive branch via a “Schedule F” executive order. “Never before has the entire movement … banded together to construct a comprehensive plan to deconstruct the out-of-touch and weaponized administrative state,” Project 2025’s former director, Paul Dans, told Axios at the time. Another architect of Project 2025, Russel Vought—whose simmering extremism has been fueled by year-long partnerships with renowned Christian nationalists—“is likely” to be appointed to a high-ranking position in a second Trump administration, the Associated Press reported Monday. Regardless, senior Trump advisers have warnednews outlets against reporting on the connections, repeatedly insisting that Project 2025 has no affiliation or involvement with the Trump campaign, and have instead pointed to Agenda47 as Trump’s official platform. They do not offer an explanation as to why Agenda47 is almost identical to Project 2025. https://newrepublic.com/post/184682/donald-trump-photo-project-2025-kevin-roberts

Got a link to back that up?

As I clearly said I believe it’s foreign actors not conservatives. And the’s scant evidence of any ”Liberal bot farms”. While there have been a few random bot-like tweets that are pro-Trudeau specifically they’re a drop in the bucket compared to the continual waves of right wing bot tweets which are legion. An earlier bot campaign was pushing “#TrudeauMustGo” tweets. Perhaps when conservatives are in power and Liberals are opposition whoever is behind this will switch sides although that’s not what we saw with Trump. The foreign bots were overwhelmingly pro-Trump regardless of whether he was in office

FWIW I don’t think PP or CPC were involved, this sounds to me like classic foreign interference in which PP and CPC are victims in a way Funny how around the world these foreign interference campaigns always overwhelmingly favour wright wing group though. They do it to the left wing groups also but never to the same extent.

Online bot campaign backing Pierre Poilievre prompts call for probe by election commissioner …These posts claimed to be from people who attended a Poilievre event in Kirkland Lake, Ont. They were actually generated by accounts in Russia, France and other places, and many of them have similar messaging. Charlie Angus, one of the NDP's MPs from the region, suggested the Conservatives were behind the operation and that it had misfired. At least one account said they had to "brave the cold to attend" the rally in Kirkland Lake. "This was done so badly where these bots were claiming they had to go through the cold in Northern Ontario at a time of a huge heat wave," Angus said. "I think it's made them look ridiculous." The Conservatives denied any role in the bot campaign. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-rally-kirkland-conservative-bots-1.7287901

Trump’s incessant lying and baseless smears is why you want to see him in office?

1) Well it wouldn’t surprise me to learn YOU were still in grade 6 as a teenager..or grade 3… but you seem unaware that kids who DON’T have low IQ turn 13 in the calendar year that they enter grade 8. 2) Also it’s no surprise you have to rely on conservative disinformation sources. You. An tell it’s disinformation because it says ambiguous and misleading things like “Washington state now appears to allow…” 3) Contrary to conservative cult teachings, surgical options for minors are extremely rare. Genital or facial alterations for minors are basically unheard of in the US, in Washington state it is illegal even with parental consent. “Gender affirming care” mostly includes a wide range of non-surgical therapy, mostly being mental health and prescription drugs. . 4) Your link is about what insurers must reimburse, not what healthcare providers must provide. 5)The WA law appears to only pertain to: a) teenagers who are estranged from their parents and under the care of the state and b) where their mental health care and medical providers have diagnosed them with gender dysphoria and recommended such treatment, aka not “unilaterally” as you dishonestly describe. As a high school dropout I suspect you know a thing or two about deadbeat parents and probably wouldn’t have wanted them making decisions about your health care. Furthermore the law also seems to say that wherever possible parents should be involved. The only one lying is you. NOBODY CHEERED, PERIOD. Obama didn’t lie about Martin and Brown and Kamala didn’t cheer either. The only one encouraging rioters was Trump when his brainless Orcs were looting the Capitol and trying to end democracy and execute its democratically elected leaders. Holy crap are you stupid. They’re referring to biological females who are trans and who want to live as men, look like men and be referred to as men but who still menstruate and can still get pregnant because they didn’t have any surgery or hormone therapy. Are you seriously so dumb you can’t figure that one out? 1) No you didn’t your just absolutely clueless about the world and your own obvious limitations 2) That happens every day on this forum The man has literally tens of thousands of documented lies big and small from his 2020 election lies to the hurricane map he had someone alter with a friggin magic marker to his claim “the people at MIT” proclaimed him a genius for his insanely stupid and barely coherent shark/ electric boat rant. Yeah you do, election denier. I will give you credit that many on here are worse than you. Sure go ahead Yeah, you don’t know. It’s called realty. Just because it doesn’t suit your cult religion doesn’t make it a false narrative. In fact the only reason you believe it’s a false narrative is because your cult tells you so. You rely on your cult to tell you what’s real or not. The whole point of the conspiracy theory about the evil “mainstream media” is so the cult can tell you disbelieve your eyes and ears and only believe what they tell you is real. Besides being a secretive backroom manipulator who avoids the limelight is the opposite of a cult leader. The cult leader is always the one on stage not the someone hiding behind a curtain. The second key characteristic is the followers devotion is to the cult leader alone, not the party, not to any key principles or values, not to other prominent cult members. Another is the belief that the cult leader has superhuman abilities and the leader alone can save themselves. Only Trump and his followers fit that description. LMAO prove it, Cult follower. Putin didn’t need to steal what Trump was handing over to him It started under Bush using the name “Al-Qaeda in Iraq” after Bush’s fraudulent and completely unnecessary Iraq invasion that needlessly killed thousands and unleashed a wave of terrorism around the world, it’s leadership was released from US prison camps in Iraq under Bush and it was already in retreat when Trump took office LMAO YEAH SURE. Trump cult followers are hard in live with Trump and nothing else. Like I said look at the hate and humiliation heaped on fellow Republicans Rittenhouse, DeSantis, Haley and others simply for daring to suggest others would better deliver conservative policies and how they had to repent and beg the angry mob for forgiveness the way “false revolutionaries” were forced to do during Mao’s Great Leap Forward Trump is 78, older than Biden was in 2020 and officially the oldest presidential candidate in US history lf he’s not in diapers already he will be soon and Im sure his followers will fill entire stadiums just for a chance to sniff them.

Trump is such a narcissist he isn’t really interested in anything except himself. As long as you bend the knee, kiss his ring and funnel money to his enterprises he could really care less if you want to ban all abortions or offer free abortions for all. He will support your agenda if you support his ego and quest for power. The project 25 cabal are just some of the grifters and fascists surrounding Trump and planning to take advantage of that.,

The fake news was your original lie that “The people who believe that gr 3 students have the wisdom to unilaterally opt for gender reassignment procedures, and that healthy adults can identify as animals” You are also lying about cheering on rioting (only the Jan 6 rioters and their republican supporters do that) Fyi- When some people say “men can menstruate and have babies” they mean people who are biologically female but identify and present themselves as men If you had. A BS filter you would die because you and your cult are 100% BS and you blindly follow whatever Trump says even when it directly contradicts what he said previously and what you’re saying. It’s also absolutely ridiculous you’ve claimed that Nancy Pelosi of all people is the alleged cult leader of the left. Can you point me to where she last held a rally with thousands of adoring followers worshipping her as a god the way Trump followers do? Is Pelosi running for president? Do people drive around with Pelosi flags and hats and shirts the way Trump simpletons do? Does Pelosi tweet all fay and night she is their salvation and their retribution and SHE ALONE can save them from destruction? Does any Democrat? The only party worshiping anyone as their infallible messiah and sole arbiter of reality the Republican Party and it worship of Trump and only Trump. And of all the leaders on the left with a popular following among the public Nancy Pelosi is not really one of them.

JD Vance writes glowing foreword to Project 2025 leader’s upcoming book Vance praises Roberts for using his perch as the president of the Heritage Foundation, a rightwing DC thinktank, to advance a more radical conservative vision rather than resting on the foundation’s laurels. “The Heritage Foundation isn’t some random outpost on Capitol Hill; it is and has been the most influential engine of ideas for Republicans from Ronald Reagan to Donald Trump,” Vance writes. “Yet it is Heritage’s power and influence that makes it easy to avoid risks. Roberts could collect a nice salary, write decent books, and tell donors what they want to hear. But Roberts believes doing the same old thing could lead to the ruin of our nation.” .. In order to create the America Roberts and Vance envision, conservatives need to go on offense – not just remove policies they don’t like, but rebuild the country in what Roberts has referred to as a “second American Revolution”. “The old conservative movement argued if you just got government out of the way, natural forces would resolve problems – we are no longer in this situation and must take a different approach,” Vance writes. “As Kevin Roberts writes, ‘It’s fine to take a laissez-faire approach when you are in the safety of the sunshine. But when the twilight descends and you hear the wolves, you’ve got to circle the wagons and load the muskets.’ “We are now all realizing that it’s time to circle the wagons and load the muskets. In the fights that lay [sic] ahead, these ideas are an essential weapon.” https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/30/jd-vance-project-2025-book-foreword Project 2025 leader’s book with JD Vance introduction delayed until after election A JD Vance-introduced book by a leader of Project 2025, the vast and controversial hardline rightwing plan for a second Trump administration, will be delayed until after the 2024 election. “There’s a time for writing, reading, and book tours – and a time to put down the books and go fight like hell to take back our country,” the book’s author, Kevin Roberts, told RealClearPolitics, which first reported the news. “That’s why I’ve chosen to move my book’s publication and promotion to after the election.” Roberts is president of the Heritage Foundation, a hard-right Washington thinktank. His book, Dawn’s Early Light: Taking Back Washington to Save America, was due to be published in September. It will now come out on 12 November, a week after Donald Trump and Kamala Harris square off on election day. As Project 2025 has attracted sustained fire from Democrats, over its 900-plus pages of plans for far-reaching government reform including attacks on reproductive rights, LGBTQ+ rights, labor rights and other progressive priorities, so Roberts’s book quickly became a magnet for controversy of its own. Trump and his campaign have sought to distance themselves from Project 2025 – efforts undermined when it became known Vance, the hardline populist Ohio senator Trump picked as his running mate, had written an introduction to Roberts’s book. Last week, the New Republic obtained Vance’s introduction, in which he called Roberts’s ideas “an essential weapon” for “the fights that lay [sic] ahead”. He also wrote: “We are now all realizing that it’s time to circle the wagons and load the muskets.” News of such violent imagery in Vance’s writing followed news that Roberts’s book was initially called Dawn’s Early Light: Burning Down Washington to Save America, and featured a match on the cover. … At the same time, Vance told RealClearPoliticsProject 2025’s 900 pages contained “some ideas I like and lot of ideas I dislike”. But in his introduction to Roberts’s book, Vance called the Heritage Foundation “the most influential engine of ideas for Republicans from Ronald Reagan to Donald Trump”. https://amp.theguardian.com/books/article/2024/aug/07/project-2025-roberts-jd-vance-introduction Trump is trying to distance himself from Project 2025 -- but its architects helped shape his RNC party platform The conservative Project 2025 seeks to overhaul the federal government. https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/trump-distance-project-2025-architects-helped-shape-rnc/story?id=111759747 Russell Vought, a Project 2025 architect, likely in line for high-ranking post if Trump wins 2nd term https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/russell-vought-a-project-2025-architect-likely-in-line-for-high-ranking-post-if-trump-wins-2nd-term Trump claims not to know who is behind Project 2025. A CNN review found at least 140 people who worked for him are involved https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/07/11/politics/trump-allies-project-2025 Republicans call Trump’s move to distance himself from Project 2025 ‘preposterous’ Trump’s claim to ‘know nothing’ about radical plan recognizes it could sink campaign, ex-Pence adviser says Olivia Troye, a former White House adviser to Mike Pence who sat in on policy sessions during Trump’s first presidency, said Trump’s attempt to distance himself from Project 2025 was driven by a recognition that its deeply controversial policy prescriptions could sink his election bid. “This is preposterous if you look at the collaborators and the authors of this plan,” she told CNN when asked whether Trump’s denial was credible. “A lot of these people…served in Trump’s cabinet during his administration. There are people that I worked with. I sat in those policy meetings with them.” Troye identified various figures – including John McEntee, who was Trump’s director of White House personnel, Stephen Miller, a senior adviser in his first administration, Ben Carson, the housing and urban development secretary in his cabinet, and Ken Cuccinelli, a former deputy secretary of homeland security – as among the project’s leading architects. Carson has been “out there on the campaign trail” with Trump, she said. “I think what this is telling us is that Donald Trump knows that what is written in this plan is so extreme that it is damaging to his possibility of getting elected, and that’s what he’s concerned about.” “Exactly how do you ‘disagree’ with something you ‘know nothing about’ or ‘have no idea’ who is behind, saying or doing the thing you disagree with?” said former RNC chair and current MSNBC host Michael Steele in echoing Troye’s derision. “And how exactly don’t you know that Project 2025 director Paul Dans served as your chief of staff at the Office of Personnel Management, and associate director Spencer Chretien served as your special assistant and associate director of presidential personnel?” https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/08/trump-project-2025

Put it more eloquently: The Trump cult has finally arrived …“Rittenhouse explained that Trump wasn’t strong enough on the Second Amendment, which isn’t particularly outlandish as far as political viewpoints go in 2024 America. He then added that he was writing in Ron Paul for the presidential election, thereby implying that he wouldn’t be voting for Trump. What followed was a veritable explosion of hatred and rage, a picture-perfect example of a “rabid Leftist” cancellation, except it was coming from the Right. People took to denouncing Rittenhouse as a lowly backstabber, a Judas in the flesh, guilty of betraying Trump. They didn’t stop there: they mocked his appearance, his weight, intimated that it would have been better if Rittenhouse had actually been shot that night in Kenosha, and that nobody should ever listen to him. Rittenhouse, who was probably quite shocked at such sheer vehemence, swiftly published a letter of apology, in which he dutifully denounced everything he’d just said and promised to be a good boy and vote for Trump. The idea that a voter owes loyalty to a politician (and should thus simply shut up if the politician is weak on the issues the voter cares about) is a strange one to have in an electoral democracy. But the mildness of Rittenhouse’s criticism — that Trump had been weak on the Second Amendment — together with the fierceness of the anger directed at him speaks to something fairly significant: it reveals a growing sense of weakness and panic on the American Right. ….Criticisms of the kind that Kyle Rittenhouse voiced — before being forced to ritually denounce them in an online Maoist struggle session — sting today because they hit at something real. Behind every lurid tale about how Trump is going to deport a hundred million illegals over lunch break while also lowering the price of hamburgers, there lurks a growing sense of aimlessness, desperation, and fear: fear that things in America are rapidly breaking apart, that more pointless forever wars loom on the horizon, that nobody — not even Trump — will actually captain the ship. Faced with this insecurity, we can see the emergence of a growing “Trump cult”, one that exists not as a casual slur but a genuine social phenomenon. …. On the American Right, by contrast, it’s important to note that the growing “Trump cult” is not a product of Donald Trump himself. It’s not a top-down scheme to trick people or string them along. Rather, it is a bottom-up phenomenon, and very likely a short-term one at that. After the Second World War, the tribal Melanesian islanders created cargo cults and built improvised runways in the hope that the American planes would be convinced to return. For many of Trump’s voters today, the choice now is to either give up hope of significant improvement, or to try to meme the good old days of 2016 back into existence, while treating anyone who risks piercing the bubble with increasing hostility…. https://unherd.com/2024/08/the-trump-cult-has-finally-arrived/

Fake news It appears to be working Authoritarian cult leaders like Trump don’t mind being called evil hut they HATE being mocked and ridiculed as weirdos

Meanwhile back in the real world the ONLY ACTUAL Cult is the cult of Trump who turned on their former hero Kyle Rittenhouse after he said he was going to write in Ron Paul for president because he thought Paul was stronger on gun rights Due to this unforgivable sin of voting according to his values instead of blindly supporting the cult leader, Rittenhouse was subjected to a torrent online bullying and harassment and denouncement from Republican voices, Rittenhouse begged for forgiveness and promised he would vote for Trump after all. Kyle Rittenhouse reverses course on not endorsing Trump after online pile-on Man who killed activists in 2020 questioned Trump’s gun rights bona fides before backing down in face of hate tweets https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/03/kyle-rittenhouse-trump-endorsement

See my post from a few minutes ago. I don’t know what you’re talking about. No monitoring? Of course there’s monitoring Multiple agencies in fact: at the federal level and climate change Canada monitors and so does the auditor general. And there’s provincial and NGO monitoring also. . In fact monitoring and reporting is required by law. No goals? There are multiple: the most prominent ones being achieve 40-45% emissions reductions below 2005 levels by 2030, and to be net zero emissions by 2050 Canada’s Enhanced Nationally Determined Contribution …In March 2022, the Government of Canada introduced Canada’s 2030 Emissions Reduction Plan, which provides a roadmap for the Canadian economy to achieve 40-45% emissions reductions below 2005 levels by 2030, building upon the actions outlined in Canada’s previous climate plans. … https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/news/2021/04/canadas-enhanced-nationally-determined-contribution.html 2023 Progress Report on the 2030 Emissions Reduction Plan The 2023 Progress Report is the first progress report on the 2030 Emissions Reduction Plan (2030 ERP), a sector-by-sector roadmap released in March 2022 that identifies climate actions and strategies for Canada to reach its 2030 emissions reduction target and net-zero emissions by 2050. The report provides an update on progress towards Canada’s emissions reduction targets described in the 2030 ERP, including a summary of the 2023 Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollutant Emissions Projections report. It also provides a measure-by-measure update on the implementation status of federal measures and strategies as well as key cooperative measures and agreements with provinces and territories. Every sector has a role to play to ensure Canada charts a successful course to a safe and secure low-carbon future. The 2023 Progress Report on the 2030 ERP is the first of three reports under the Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act. Subsequent reports are required in 2025 and 2027 under the legislation. https://www.canada.ca/en/services/environment/weather/climatechange/climate-plan/climate-plan-overview/emissions-reduction-2030/2023-progress-report.html

You obviously didn’t read any of the links I provided. One of them even has the word “Emergency” right the title and used the word “crisis” 5 times in the article . You’re not going to do that thing you do where you lie and claim the article says the exact opposite of what it actually says, are you? Or are you going to play your other dumb game like when you claimed calling someone a Marxist is completely different from calling them a communist? Are we going to have to hear there’s a magic secret rule that it doesn’t count unless the word is ised at least 6 times? If you want more links I can bury you in them but we both know it’s a waste of time because you won’t read them, will lie about them, and/or will invent childish asinine arguments about them. But here you go. Cited as a source in the very first link provided from NASA: SOCIETY MUST ADDRESS THE GROWING CLIMATE CRISIS NOW Download the PDF Immediate and coordinated actions to limit and adapt to human-caused climate change are needed to protect human and ecological health, economic well-being, and global security. https://www.agu.org/Share-and-Advocate/Share/Policymakers/Position-Statements/Position_Climate COP28 agreement: embracing the urgency of the scientific consensus? As COP28 ended in Dubai on December 12, 2023, the international community marked a significant step forward in addressing the climate crisis, while acknowledging the urgent need for greater ambition and action. The International Science Council (ISC), its members, Affiliated bodies and partners actively participated, urging policy-makers to seize the momentum and drive ambitious, science-based, sustainable policy solutions to face the existential climate threat. …. https://council.science/blog/cop28-urgency-of-scientific-consensus/ The climate change emergency Our climate change crisis https://www.sciencenews.org/century/climate-change-carbon-dioxide-greenhouse-gas-emissions-global-warming The Climate Crisis – A Race We Can Win https://www.un.org/en/un75/climate-crisis-race-we-can-win And so on. Qualifications matter and the deniers you keep citing have none . They’re not recognized as experts. Many aren’t even actual scientists. They work for politicized groups like Fraser institute or they take money directly from polluters. When it’s NASA, United Nations, professional scientific bodies on my side vs some random dudes from the internet on your side don’t get to whine that people laugh at your random dude from the internet instead of debating his arguments point by point. And yet I still did post 2 videos where an actual scientist dismantles the random dude from the internet point by point. It’s been repeatedly shown in case you’re in such a bubble you’re completely unaware of the wildfires and other natural disasters that have now become completely routine. This is an absolutely idi*tic question. As I already pointed out that’s like someone who wants to commit crimes saying “show what impact anything I might have on the crime rate”. It’s GLOBAL warming. The requirement is to reduce GLOBAL emissions. Canada is on the globe. Don’t you get it? It been explained to you already. I’ve been trying to figure out what your angle is here: are you trying to argue that as long as every country EXCEPT Canada reduces GHG emissions we won’t have to? Are you demanding to see a paper that days global efforts to stop climate change by reducing GHG will fail unless Canada also participates? Are you demanding to see a paper that claims Canada alone must reduce GHG emissions to stop climate change while the rest of the world can keep polluting? Every possible reason for asking this question is just beyond stupid. They’ve been answered but you’re too thick-headed and dishonest to actually consider them. None are so blind as those who refuse to see.

You’re thenone sho doesn’t have reading comprehension. In fact I doubt you evn bothered to read anything posted. It’s been provided.

Lol. There is a consensus. Deal with it.

LMAO this is actually Trump’s policy on Electric vehicles, in his own words “I say what would happen if the boat sank from its weight? And you’re in the boat and you have this tremendously powerful battery, and the battery is now underwater, and there’s a shark that’s approximately ten yards over there? By the way, a lot of shark attacks lately, did you notice that? I watched some guys justifying it today, ‘well they weren’t really that angry, they bit off the young lady’s leg because of the fact that they were not hungry, but they misunderstood who she was. So there’s a shark ten yards, or here. Do I get electrocuted if the boat is sinking and water goes over the battery? Do I stay on top of the boat and get electrocuted, or do I jump over by the shark and not get electrocuted? You know what I would do, if there’s a shark or get electrocuted? I would take electrocuted every single time. I’m not gettin’ near the shark.“ -Donald J Trump That was supposed to be his argument against his completely made-up false claim that there would be mandatory electric boats under democrats (not a thing) that the boats would electrocute passengers if they sank (also not a thing)…..but in a hilarious plot twist he completely loses track of the point of his absurd hypothetical and actually prefers the electric boat over the shark after all! LMAO you can’t make this stuff up. This guy is such a nutjob.