Infidel Dog

I've been noticing you're starting to catch up, Eyeball. Good for you. No matter how you're doing it.

Lauren Southern has made a lot of new enemies covering this story since it came out. She's all over Professor Rouillard QOC. So happy somebody else finally gets it. She video documents the tale from start to finish here: Not ONE Body Found in Canadian "Mass Graves" Once one knows the whole story one has to conclude the way the media desperately built something out of nothing is pretty shameful.

Yeah, yeah, we know... "If y'all don't agree with us then y'all ain't black." They're no longer black because they don't think the way you think a black person needs to think to be considered black. Right? https://citizenfreepress.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/biden-trump-black-guns-maga.jpg Problem is there's more and more of the innately tanned turning up thinking for themselves. Soon all your partisan warped, bigoted mind we'll be able to see is white people because your brain training won't allow you to acknowledge blacks who no longer accept the Progressive Socialist narrative can still be black. Biden hemorrhaging black voters…

Better clarify what I'm actually saying because the Prog left has a hard time hearing anything they don't want to hear. They simplify convert it into something they'd prefer to believe. I'm not saying the truth about what went wrong with the understanding and handling of covid is starting to penetrate classic liberals' minds therefore the soft left like Bill Maher is therefore always right or now everyone must now agree with anything they ever said. I'm saying they are starting to notice they got a lot about the covid thing wrong and they're coming back to join us in the land of the rational. I'll go farther than that. It won't be too long after that, that what think of themselves as moderates or independents start to get it too. Specifically on covid. Progs unfortunately will never get it. Most likely, when convenient they'll say they do and always did but the lack of sincerity will drip to a pour so hard even the softer (as in capable of reason) left will be able to tell.

You see which way it is has to go as it gets harder to deny the so-called "conspiracy theorists" keep being right:

On some other thread some hard core "Progressive" type was getting angry at me on something concerning covid and I said to him, something like, "I'll make a prediction. In another year all of you will be thinking like me and those who share my stance on the mandates and masks and passports. "They're a dumb idea," you'll say. This is good but when the logic hammer does finally bang you over the head so hard you'll have to say 'hi there' you're going to say 'I always thought like this' and accuse me of being slow to get it. Oh well...such is life in a world with Progs. But there's a better thing happening right now. What I'll call the softer or more rational left of actual liberals are starting to get it. I expect this to continue. Would you like an example?

Haven't a clue what you're talking about and best guess says that makes 2 of us. I'm hearing about the "Democrat voting plantation" and the societal impact of the fatherless black family from blacks like Jesse Lee Peterson and Candace Owens.

The problem with "build back better" is it implies dismantling the old structure. I didn't mind most of what I grew up with. We Canadians and Americans had it pretty good and don't assume I'm white. As to privilege that genuinely privileged crowd will not only still be privileged, they'll be more privileged, regardless of colour, after they've sucked the gullibles into their "build back better" scheme.

Now as to this idea you have that women don't generally masturbate you need to get out more. https://nypost.com/2019/05/09/study-reveals-how-americans-like-to-masturbate/

Here's the problem with that then. You're wrong. Asians represent 5.9% of the American population but only 1.5% of the prison population. Even if that was not the case a high percentage of the population incarcerated would not show " intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group." So no genocide. And even if you believe it does where would you get the idea whites were acting under orders from a Christian or Jewish God?

How brain-trained would you have to be to be able to avoid knowing America was energy independent under Trump.

Here's a cute idea: "After the Republicans win the midterm elections, they should keep the January 6 committee in place — but under new management...." https://thebluestateconservative.com/2022/01/21/the-january-6-narrative-is-starting-to-unravel/

No, I'm thinking if somebody tells me this is a story from social media that's the way I should accept it. If you want to believe it's something else then that's on you.

Going off point for a sec, I'm curious about something. What's in the air these days. It seems like some irrational type with no support for any of his lunacy registers here disappears, then another one who's pretty much a clone of that one registers and starts the nonsense up again. Is it like some sort of relay from CKA, or Rabble or something.

How is that circular? You said there was no such thing as Faucism. Being a nice guy, I tried to help you out of your ignorance by giving you a link to a definition of Faucism. You claimed I didn't give you links to information. I showed you I did. That's not circular logic. That's evidence of you being consistently incorrect. Are you trying to prove my point about how there are certain types who just redefine definitions in their heads to confirm what they'd like to believe.

I gave you a link to a definition of Faucism. What more do you want?

Don't just pretend to be brilliant with secret knowledge. Show me what you're talking about.

I don't know. Neologisms happen. Always have. Always will. I think a better example of butt-fucking the English language would be that thing they do when they simply suggest words or terms now mean something superior beings such as themselves would prefer they did. You know like what you just did, thinking you were clever talking about "sodomizing the use of language." That's not what neologisms are. They're accepted use. They're how language grows. They're why dictionaries add new words every year.

Well, it's a relatively new term and as such the concrete definition has yet to establish itself. I'm not opposed to Myata's definition where it's a pretense of science without any actual science but I think the Urban Dictionary's attempt describes what people think of when they hear the term better: By either definition though "Faucism" is not science. That's a constant and I believe that was the main point of the OP.

If it's as blatant as you suggest it should be easy enough for you to offer up a quote. Why didn't you?

You apparently suffer from the "Progressive" delusion that a definition can change to accommodate whatever you would prefer to believe.

When you say "colored" you mean Afro-Americans, right? Unequal levels of incarceration isn't a problem for Asians (as in Orientals) for example. I see the problem with higher levels of incarcerations of Afro-Americans centering on the fact they do more crimes - violent crimes in particular. There are many theories as to why that is, but God ordering Whites to throw them in jail is not one of them. That would be lunatic fringe. I hope that's not what you're suggesting. I lean more towards the hypothesis of lack of male parenting and segregation into voter plantations by Democrat policies following and including Johnson's great society. Such patriarchal, 'the bosses will look after you", equity, style programs robbed them of their self-worth. I don't think God told the Democrats to do it though. Unless you tell me Karl Marx is God.

This idea you've debunked an idea by slurring specific people has got to end. Some people suggest they lack recourse if they allege a covid vaccination causes harm to them or theirs. Specifically in the article in a specific case the defense lawyer was talking about recourse from insurers. If you have reason or fact based evidence showing that isn't the case I'd love to hear it. But if all you have is "somebody writing an article is a big, fat, poopy head for telling us about it' you've got nothing.

The lawyer in the case made allegations on social media. It has use within that context and the article never claimed it was anything else. In fact he specifically stated that's all it was. If you didn't understand that the problem was on your end.

Here the definition of Genocide: "Genocide is an internationally recognized crime where acts are committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group." So what specific national, ethnic racial or religious group did the US intend to destroy under command from a Jewish or Christian God.