Infidel Dog

Hard to put a number to it. For me everything started to turn to crap about the time the thing I call "They" had Al Gore go out into the world and Preach on how nice weather was going to end the world. What was that? About 2007. On the other hand my dad used to say you could trace everything that went wrong with Canada back to Trudeau. He meant Pierre. He wasn't around for Justin or I imagine he would have added that to the list.

I don't know Kanonir. If you and that other operative that all of a sudden turned up here are examples of the best the Putin regime can put together to attempt an influence on Western opinion I see why his disorganized army bully-boys are having so many problems trying to take over the Ukraine.

And yet somehow, in the old days, when integration not multi-culturalism was the way, we got by.

Yeah, I guess... Some day soon we'll be remembering how nice it was to have those.

Wonder if these Ukrainian girls coming in will do better with the English. Hope So. Hey...zipping into the weeds for a bit, but you know those phone scammers that call you with heavy accents and tell you their names are Joe or Sally? (Hoping to rob elderly Canadians of their life savings.) Most of them appear to be from New Delhi in India. That's where the scammer call centers appear to be centered. Why did they bother learning to speak English, I always wonder. I suspect these are the next wave of multi-cults hoping to take advantage of Justin's infamous invitation.

Maybe...would be nice if they integrated the ones who take my order a little better. Could they not at least teach them to speak English a little better and not treat me like I'm the one with the problem when I don't understand them?

Hand up...waving wildly, "Me too! Me too! Multi-culturalism and the fools who push it suck. Integration is the way to go." There is one thing I disagree with the OP on though. I like A&W coffee. I'm even willing to buy it off the poor sad little Multi-cult girls the Trudeau regime ships in from Asia to rob our born in Canada, teenage girls of a starting job for their resumes. But don't they teach manners in those multi-cult countries? Our born in Canada girls are much more polite. Go our girls. Wait, pretend I didn't say that last bit out loud. I don't want the government's banking fascists blocking off my bank account.

I may be misunderstanding your argument. It appears to go something like this: 'Government waste isn't that bad and anybody who doesn't think so sucks.' Is that about it?

But wait, Moonbox. You're starting to confuse me again. Weren't you telling us last week what a great Conservative you were - voting for Harper twice and Ford once? You said. But now you appear to be arguing in favor of Government waste. Huh?

Wolverines aren't just graffiti you might see on a Ukrainian building.

Teenage buskers. Gotta love 'em. From LA: Karolina Protsenko: From the streets of Dublin, Allie Shelock:

Better unblock me too (again) Mikey. I have an important update for you. (You know I wouldn't have to be giving you these if you'd can this stubborn proggy refusal to click the links.) Turns out this Act has nothing to do with 'tornado alerts." Actually it doesn't even signify a government attempt to modify the weather. I mean let's face it, even your government paid MSM would recognize that as ridiculous - to think a government or governments could actually "modify" the weather. How would that even work if they could? Everybody would vote on the amount of sun to rainy days and when winter would start or something? But no, what this act actually says (or at least what the info at the link says it says) is if you want to do something to modify the weather you have to notify the government and await further instructions. One wouldn't expect that to be a big problem for the rest of us. However... The problem I would have with this Act as described is how much control would they want and what do they mean specifically by taking actions to modify the weather. Do they mean you would have to express intent to modify the weather. As an example would you want to seed the clouds or create more of them (as I believe Bill Gates suggested.) I guess if the government wanted to monitor that sort of thing it wouldn't matter much to the rest of us. But would it cover things like fuel refinement, pipelines, mining, opening a new cement company and such. How much does the government want to take more control of under this act. I think it's worth wondering about that. I always remember how the American EPA went nuts under Obama when he nazified them. For a while rural residents couldn't even gather rainwater from their eves. They had to contact the EPA and await further instructions. If they didn't there were big penalties.

I'm pretty sure when you say "environment" you mean the mythical catastrophe of global warming, right? I heard an interesting one on the morning CTV news. They tell us gas prices are currently going down. But they tell us to jump on that quick before Friday, because Carbon Taxes are rising on that day. So Carbon Taxes do affect the price at the pump after all, do they CTV? Thanks for the update. Will you also be updating your BS that the price of gas doesn't affect inflation?

Russian voters are kind of like the Queen in that they aren't actually needed. Commonwealth governments function without the Queen and what you would laughably call Russian "democracy" gets by without actual voters. Putin the Poisoner doesn't need or use them to get elected. He just wakes up the morning before the "election" and decides what the numbers will look like.

Not that this will matter to you but I can present you media from my side of the aisle making this claim: I imagine the CBC and the rest of Canada's paid media was too busy standing ovating and cheering up in the Peanut Gallery to notice though.

So the MEPs in the bottom pic gave our fraud of a PM a standing ovation, did they? Not sure I believe that. The Peanut Gallery above them did, maybe. I imagine the CBC was up there. But how many MEPs would you say are there in the EU seats? 20 maybe... That's hardly 200, is it?

I'll show you what I mean. Compare the EU MEP audience here, in a session where a member was warning the EU against inviting Little Potato to the picture below that where who ever the dummy was who was in charge didn't take the advice and allowed Prime Minister Blackface into the EU parliament building.

I see. So what's your point then? That Mr. Dressup brought some fans with him into the peanut gallery? How much do Trudeau "fans" charge for a standing ovation, anyway. Should we ask the CBC? Good for him, I guess. But there were very few of the EU MEPs he crossed continents thinking they were who he was going to address. There wasn't 200, that's for sure.

Well, I didn't want to embarrass you further...but what the Hell...if you insist. CBC claims Trudeau got a standing ovation, doesn’t mention empty parliament or denouncement Majority of seats empty during Trudeau's speech to European Parliament Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had trouble filling out the seats of European Parliament during his speech. As to the rest of your blather... As always you're wrong but I can't be bothered to point out why. You should be able to figure it out. Here's a hint though: What is it about you Prog types that you always miss the obvious.

Actually, I think the National Post may have posted the story shortly after I did my search but the others were either updates or late comers in the following days. The CBC, for example, didn't post the story about their boss not being universally loved by the EU until yesterday. I think it was yesterday.

And as I told you you're wrong about Rebel. Click the little YouTube link below to see the date. Live streamed March 24. So maybe you're not exactly "full of it." You're just wrong again. You're choosing to believe a lie if you don't know those "updates" on the MSM stories were weasel editors desperately trying to cover their asses on the story they tried to bury on March 24 but too many independent outlets caught them. They had to deal with a story that was going viral in spite of their best efforts so it was, "Quick Robin to the "Update" mobile."

Well, Your Majesty...you're wrong, of course. As always. Rebel streamed the story live on March 24. The Toronto Sun posted the story as it currently appears on March 24. That was the day I did a search for the story before I posted the Sun telling of it. I could only find that Toronto Sun story on the subject of the EU members who bashed Trudeau as a democracy hating dictator wannabe on March 24. Now there no doubt were stories about Trudeau's reception by the better trained members of the EU but the story of malcontents did not appear in the MSM until the following 2 days after they had to deal with all the complaints from readers wondering why they buried the story. Then they all posted something they called "Updates."

Switching? Where did you get that from? I explained this all pretty crystal clear in my posting of this story in the News Club. Is that why you all of a sudden disappeared from that thread and scrambled over here? Clarity is the nemesis of the King of Wrong. No? Here ya go then have another crack at it:

The following day or the day after as updates. Let's guess the bit they updated, shall we...and why.

You requested information on where the other side gets news they trust. I'm telling you Ground news will give you both sides and that's the best many of us can do for trust. I'm beginning to think you didn't actually want an answer. You didn't ask for a fact checker. You asked where people who didn't fully trust the MSM version of the news got theirs. Almost all fact checkers are deeply biased. Almost always to the left. I'll read them then I'll read around fact-checking the fact checkers. Empowerment over enablement. Trusting in your own ability to make a rational decision over blind faith belief in the narrative.