Infidel Dog

Yeah, don't care. It's still crooked and reeks of a news media bribe.

Hey, speaking of True North, the Canadian left's media bribes and stories the mainstream media won't tell you, True North had one last May like that: Liberals sneak in amendment allowing media to double-dip into taxpayer funds

I know this, neither Rebel Media nor True North of the Canadian right gets media funding from the the Canadian left running government right now and before the left took over nobody in Canadian media did.

Oh hang on, I get it... You weren't saying some Canadian media gets money from right wing sources. You were insinuating that because an American media conglomerate bought up 66% of the National Post there might be something wrong with them getting in on the bribe from Trudeau of Canadian taxpayer money. Yeah, maybe, but that wasn't the point. The point was that because Trudeau stuff's dollars into Canadian MSM's G string (so to speak) you can't rely on any kind of integrity or even credibility from them. No matter who they are or where investors hang their hats. BTW, the National Post has been swinging farther and farther to the left for some time now. To be honest though that started even before Prime Minister Moneybags was gifting any media willing to play ball. Come to think of it though...maybe that's how they got in Little Potato's black book.

I gave you a link to Trudeau paying off the media. Let's see what you're talking about. Give me one.

C'mon...are you seriously telling me you're hallucinating that you're a hallucination? I quoted you. I was talking to you. And your little voice of the hallucinating hallucination is telling you it's insane to mock CNN is it? Oh well, enjoy your CNN, I guess.

Really you didn't hear about Trudeau paying off the media with taxpayer money? Must be another one of those stories the mainstream media won't tell you about. No problem. I can help you out. Here ya go. How Trudeau bought the media

What journalism? When a political party pays the media, like they do in Canada, that's not journalism. Or is the mocking of CNN the pee in your cornflakes? Who's afraid if that sort of thing is what bothers you? Not us mockers.

And yet I did link to them directly. The data there showed exactly what myself and Epoch times claimed it would. We were right. You were wrong. Making your actual success rate the sum total of never. Tap out.

The title was correct. You were wrong. I was right. Your useless attempt to backtrack by pretending your original claim was something different is fooling nobody. Just go find a hanky and blow your nose for Christ sakes. I'm starting to feel sorry for you.

Well if you want to get into "what is truth" I worry that might be above your pay grade - so to speak. Let's just say factual then. The claim of Epoch Times as to what was on the CDC website was factual. I was right. That additional stuff you attempt to smear with is just the usual useless attempt at another child of Prog diversion.

You were wrong. Stop your whimpering. You were wrong and I was right. Wah!!! is no excuse.

Buddy, the title of the article said exactly what the CDC graph and data showed. It was posted as a BTW addition to the previous post of mine. That was the limit of my claim and the claim of the title and link I posted. I don't know what you're talking about. Sounds like some major back-tracking hiding behind smears. The link proved the title of the article correct and therefore you wrong. You were wrong. Live with it. You were posturing like some superior intellect from on high and that bubble was burst. Too bad. So sad. Stop thinking you can distract from your disgrace by being abstruse.

Not sure what you're talking about but according to the CDC Covid cases jumped 1,000 percent in a month during Omicron. Apparently hospitalizations jumped among the vaccinated as well. That's according to the Prog-approved CDC.

Speaking of that Origins of the Wuhan virus and the Epoch Times... During the early stages of the pandemic Epoch Times did a lengthy, meticulously researched piece on the possibility of a lab leak. I linked to it at another message board. Progs had recently taken over the moderation. They do love to hijack. Anyway one of them posted me an angry message in emboldened red, posturing from on high with a link to a CBC love letter to the Chi-Comms on how their disease could only originate from bat soup. I got the same reaction of a flood of wild-eyed, brain-trained true believers besieging me with the prog version of crosses like I was some kind of internet vampire. It was like "Back! Back demon spirit with your manifestations of evil from the Epoch Times. I think they even gave me a link to the new Proggish bible of mediabiasfactcheck. I do seem to remember one of them horrified by the idea that Falun Gong financed ET's creation.

Oh and the Title of the article was. "COVID-19 Cases, Hospitalizations Jump Among Vaccinated: CDC Data" so yeah, that's justified

Ah, c'mon man...I was hoping you'd do your pompous ass thing again. Oh well, another disappointment...may as well just post the link then. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#rates-by-vaccine-status There's an interactive graph there with data info. The claim in the Epoch Times article was cases among the vaccinated increased 1,000 percent between December 11 and January 8. I don't see what hospitalizations would have to do with infections but Moonbox seemed interested so I might as well show him what Epoch Times said about that, as long as I had to go to back to the article for you:

Of course I do, because it's true. Look the guy up that runs mediabiasfactcheck. He's nobody - just an armchair lefty with an opinion about other peoples' opinions. Now as to your critique about the context of Epoch's article on the 1,000 percent increase in cases during Omicron the single data point increase was the point and went to the idea we were discussing of a "pandemic of the vaccinated." In other words - Infections - not hospitalizations or anything else. The radical rise of cases among the vaccinated during Omicron doesn't reflect well on the ability of what they call a "vaccine" to ward off infections during upcoming expected variants. Although there is context you missed. Cases of the unvaccinated also rose radically according to that particular CDC dataset. Not sure that matters to the point though.

Well first of all don't write off the "etc." so quickly. I've heard estimates of as many as 242 adverse events. For me the neurological disorders are even scarier than the heart problems. Here''s a local one. " Dr. Henry, Health Minister Adrian Dix, and Premier John Horgan, have allotted no exemptions for people like Tenley Csolle. The once vibrant and active 22-year-old rehab therapist assistant immediately fell ill after taking the jab and lost the use of her legs two weeks later. Now she must potentially put herself at risk by having a second Moderna injection in order to qualify for a vaccine passport." https://www.rebelnews.com/bc_vax_pass_punishes_young_health_care_worker_who_cant_walk_following_moderna_jab Video at the link. As to the odds, there are arguments on how bad those are but I'm not sure that matters. The fact is really bad things can happen and that's one of the things people factor in when they decide whether or not they want to risk the jab.

Sure I can link to them directly for you. But first strut around for us a little more before I reveal you as a pompous ass without a clue. Go ahead. One more time. I double-dog dare you and be sure to be at least as puffed up, posturing and pompous as you were the first time or it won't be any fun. BTW you've never been able to show I can't back up a claim. Never. Ever.

Could be, but all that would really show is what they call a "vaccine" is really just another therapeutic to control symptoms somewhat. I hear they came out with a new one in Quebec somewhere. It's plant based, or something. Apparently it behaves more like a traditional vaccine. I might try that one out after a few million of you guinea pig people check it out for me.

Yes to the first. That's the way it's most often used these days in reference to the Chi-Comm virus.

Pardon me, my mistake. You simply believe any 19 year old not wanting the clot shot is a fool, even though he might be naturally immune, highly unlikely to be seriously damaged if he got the chi-comm flu simply by the statistic of his age and aware of the fact Myocarditis from the vax is more likely to hit those of his age. Good to know you're at least willing to allow us to disagree though. Many who believe such nonsense aren't.

You mean like "the science." I thought the non-compliant didn't have any of that. Now you're admitting the science of "natural Immunity" does exist. Cool. Why do you need the naturally immune segregated out of society if they don't get your vax pass then?