Infidel Dog

Hundreds of millions of babies against the odd "back alley abortion" that may or may not happen in the hysterical manner your rhetoric implies. Women die during clinical abortions too. But wouldn't the risk be "her body, her choice?"

You wouldn't last ten seconds in a debate with Shapiro that relied on more than vilification and defamation. Unfortunately for you after they're gone your debating toolbox is empty. I notice you can't actually challenge Ben's contention that potential for sentience implies intrinsic human moral value. If you're in a coma from which you may awake somebody can't just come along and stab you dead under the law. Why not?

Check out the clip above your post. Shapiro makes a good point about "potential sentience" and how it creates the existence of humanity. He asks the question of a questioner, "if you're in a coma can I stab you?"

The nervous system begins developing at 6 weeks. Nothing you say matters much after that.

" Three years after the events of the SNC-Lavalin affair, the Trudeau government is once again facing down accusations that they actively meddled in the Canadian justice system to achieve a political end. With SNC-Lavalin, the charge was that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s office pressured his justice minister to unilaterally drop bribery charges against a Liberal-allied engineering firm. This time around, it’s that Trudeau’s public safety minister pressed RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki to “jeopardize” a mass-shooting investigation so that they could push a gun control package. And in both cases, the allegations have come from some very reputable sources. The most inculpating details of the SNC-Lavalin affair came directly from Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould herself. With the RCMP scandal, the government’s alleged actions were outed by its own federal inquiry." More at the National Post

No, but it does add to the support for the obvious conclusion you don't have a clue what you're talking about when you try to pass the lame attendance for Sniffy/Cackler campaign events off as covid related. Very few cared about those two then and even fewer care about them now. But Sniffy Joe got more votes than Obama did he? Not likely.

But they showed up for Trump. And your guys showed up for BLM riots...pardon me, "mostly peaceful protests."

No. As usual it's you that doesn't get it. I'll try to help you out with that in a minute, but first of all if 2000 mules is nonsense why can't you prove it, because from what I've seen so far, you can't. Your "fact checkers" told you or at least implied -and you swallowed it whole - that the spread of Republican Zuckerbuck donations was equal to Democrat gifts. Well, your majesty, add that to the ever-lengthening list of things you're wrong about. Zuckerbuck donations to Republican districts were TOKEN. Some Zuckerberg cash filtered into some Republican districts but from the start it was a Democrat operation. It went like this: How Zuckerberg Used a Tax-Exempt Foundation to Help Biden Fix the 2020 Election

Build back better isn't Biden. He just jumped on board. It's the idea what is must be deconstructed to rebuild a more heavily managed system by a thing I'll call "They" for convenience sake. That's not Con. It's Prog. And yeah, that's you. They may have got you while you weren't looking and for that you have my sympathy but don't tell me I don't see what I see. You're a Prog not a Con. Most likely more a Prog-Con but that's still just Prog to me and other more traditional Cons.

Some time between Gore and Greta I can remember the thing I'll call "They" telling us they wanted to raise the price of oil so high we'd push off fossil fuels. OK, so that's almost done. Very well, planet savers...now what?

Because, Covid, you mean... Very well what's Sniffy and Cacklin' Kamala's excuse now then? Because they still can't fill a room for so much as a Democrat lady's tea. Kamala Harris Forced To CANCEL Event Due To Low Ticket Sales!

You Progs and your Phony "fact checkers" crack me up. Not just me. Watch Sky News having a good laugh at Snopes for doing pretty much the same thing your Politifact "fact checker" did. They're mocking Snopes for finding the true story of Biden funding crack pipes to be a false claim based on the fact Biden wasn't only funding crack pipes. Get it? He was funding crack pipes but he wasn't guilty of funding crack pipes because he was also funding other stuff. Politifact does the same thing. They tell us Gableman's finding that Zuckerbucks were funding the election in the five largest Wisconsin counties to be false. Politifact is hoping you're dumb as a Snopes reader because they admit that's true before they call it false. They say it's false because although the central claim of Zuckerbucks pouring millions into the electoral process of the five largest Wisconsin cities is true it's false because they claim some Zuckerbucks also influenced the elections of other smaller Wisconsin counties. Thanks for the yuks Beave. Oh and thanks for the links. Here's some for you: How Fact Checking Is Controlled and Faked Invasion of the Fact-Checkers

There ya go, your majesty. "Debunk" that.

But yeah, it does look like the Zuckerbergs found a temporary loophole. However it's doubtful they'll get away with it with impunity again. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house-republicans-end-zuckerbucks-act-non-profits-donating-election-organizations-mark-zuckerberg https://www.rnla.org/states_line_up_to_ban_zuckerbucks I suspect the Soros's and the Steyer's and that whole bunch of billionaires that back the Democrat party have been doing similar to the Zuckerberg scam for years but in a lesser, more clandestine way. The Zucks pulled back the curtain though. I suspect his fellow Democrat billionaires are also pissed at him. Oh and speaking of Democrat billionaires did you notice in the Forbes link you offered that 3 of the top 5 donators were Democrats, as were the top 2? (And one of the top 5 Republican donators is dead, so scratch him for upcoming elections.)

Ahh...poor Beave. You put so much work into that all week I'm almost sorry I have to pop your bubble. But I do. As to what Zuckerberg did being "perfectly and explicitly legal"...not exactly. It differs by state but in Wisconsin, for example a Wisconsin Elections Commission found it was not "technically illegal" in December however in February... https://iotwreport.com/special-counsel-finds-zuckerbucks-violated-wisconsin-bribery-laws/ Now as to your Apples/Oranges comparison of Super Pacs to donations to 501c's. Here's the story on Super Pacs: https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/super-pacs/2020 The Zuckerbergs donated to nonprofit 501 c's. Here's the problem with donating to 501 c's when there's a political pretense: https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organizations/the-restriction-of-political-campaign-intervention-by-section-501c3-tax-exempt-organizations The way the Zucks and their 501c's got around that was they didn't donate to a specific campaign. They donated under the pretense of only wanting to help the electoral process. The Republican Super Pac donations you cite were made over time to support multiple specific targets. The Zuckerberg donations were a 1 time donation to corrupt the electoral process to work in favor of one candidate in a presidential election. I'm not sure if you understand what the Zuckerbucks actually did. Liz Wheeler explains:

I just buy it to wake up in the morning. I get a large can of the cheap stuff (whatever that is) from the supermarket then I add a bag of Nabob. If I want a cup of good coffee I go to A&W. I think it was around a couple bucks last time.

Progdom.

$5...really? Is that what you're paying for Prog coffee, now? How much do you dummies pay for those little bottles of tap water with the fancy labels now?

Jeez...Toronto... Get a grip will you. This is why you can't have nice things. After Trudeau grabs your guns why shouldn't he have eyes on your subway.

" A woman is in hospital after she was lit on fire at a subway station in Toronto's west end. Friday's incident comes on the heels of two other notable attacks at Toronto subway stations. In April, international student Kartik Vasudev was killed in a shooting outside Sherbourne subway station. That same month, a 39-year-old narrowly escaped being hit by a train after she was pushed onto the tracks from a subway platform at Bloor-Yonge subway station. Late last month, a man was robbed and beaten outside Dundas subway station. Christian Garcia told CBC News this week he's calling for more security and staff at TTC stops."

Oh yeah... And for those who care Toronto also got in: " The reaction to Toronto getting in as the other Canadian host city was muted"

" Four years ago, Toronto, Montreal, Edmonton and Vancouver started out as the original Canadian sites considered by FIFA for the 2026 tournament. In the end, it was more coronation than trepidation as Vancouver was selected as a host city for the 2026 FIFA World Cup. While 17 cities across the U.S., and three in Mexico sweated it out to see if they would be one of the 10 to 12 selected to host games in Thursday’s announcement by soccer’s global governing body, Canada was just ready to get the party started. The few fans allowed into B.C. Place Stadium, the venue for the 2026 games, cheered lustily as fireworks went off when Vancouver was announced. https://theprovince.com/sports/soccer/international-soccer/game-on-vancouver-crowned-as-2026-fifa-world-cup-host-city

Selective prosecution, 2 tier justice and on it goes. Prove it. Show me your specific example. It was a half a billion dollars more of less. It went to NGOs that maneuvered the electoral process to favor Biden. Go ahead post your link. We both know you can't but I'll be happy to show you why you're wrong if you want to try to post an example. Those are not equivalent to what Zuckerberg did but there are equivalencies amongst Democrats to those allegations. From Soros on down. D'Souza was a misdemeanor. Zuckerberg corrupted a presidential election.

Still haven't figured out what a smilie signifies, eh? How are you with memes?

What are you talking about? He's talking about who would win a debate between say, something like Ben Shapiro and AOC. That has nothing to do with the Koran. The inevitability of your girl getting crushed in such a match-up is almost biblical in its certainty.