Infidel Dog

I saw another one like that where Globalists and Leftists (but I repeat myself) were talking about how clever they were for seeing a future where the Euro based races were homogenized into a mixed glob. Seriously there's one where this female Swedish politician is bragging about how they're won't be blondes in Sweden anymore and her party is clapping and cheering. There's a bunch like that of American democrats. I won't spend the rest of my day looking for them, Mikey. You'll have to take my word for it or blaspheme against the prog religion and look beyond the corporate, state, and progressive media for yourself. I can start you off. I think Tucker has one like that where he's laughing about how the progs are frothing at the mouth about how he's pushing the great replacement theory but he shows clips of where he got the idea and it was from Democrats.

Think when he gets her home he slips her the tongue?

Which? You mean this one? What are you having trouble with? You think they're all photo shop or you don't believe that's his granddaughter? Do you know what an image search is? Here, I'll show you one for the image on the left. https://tineye.com/search/515fbf7f4ce5e8e570f661eae4a0602f3a62111f?sort=score&order=desc&page=1 Yes, that is his granddaughter and that one is the same kiss as this one:

See that smooch on the bottom left? That's his granddaughter. The dementia ridden ol' perv.

Try glancing over to right of this thread. I can't believe you didn't see this: or were you just hoping I wouldn't notice?

There's a vast field of incidents of sniffing, probing, stroking etc. But go ahead, pretend you didn't know that. Again, I'm beginning to wonder why you're so frantic to deny general knowledge on this issue.

I watched the bit on the abortion question. Surprised me. That was where Herschel was supposed to be most vulnerable. He did well.

Have you ever seen that old Al Pacino movie from the 70s where he was this guy who held up a bank to finance the sex change operation he wanted to get for his boyfriend? It was based on a true story. Hey, maybe that's how Joe plans to fight crime. Finance their sex change operations so they'll stop heisting banks and such. Joe's done crazier things.

Yeah, but I would expect you as an unapologetic NDPer to remember we BCers have a lot socialists in every nook and cranny of the infrastructure wanting to tax everything and support any green wacko wanting to protest and stop any kind of improvement in the deliverance of energy. We should have more refineries too but the leftist warmiacs would never stand for that. Then there's the Progressive socialists in Ottawa printing out new money like they think they're Joe Biden.

It's true there's also this from the 7th month of 1995: But that's just scuttlebutt from a Chicago commentator. Most likely a contrived leak from Obama's camp. The 2 actual announcements happened well into the second half of 1995. Also the leak only says Obama is planning to run. It doesn't say Palmer has chosen him to succeed her.

I think you need to read my cite a little more closely: OK, now let me help you with your problem. Apparently the fact September was also in the second half of 1995 escapes you. September was the 9th month of the year. Still is. Will you be needing me to go through the math with you to show you how that works? I think you can figure that one out by yourself though, so why are you having difficulty understanding that if both the public announcement and private announcement both happened in the second half of 1995 the private announcement at a private gathering of Chicago's political insiders came first? If it had been public like his announcement to press and supporters there would have been no need to announce it privately. That would be this thing we over on the right like to refer to as common sense.

Buddy, I just got here. I don't know what you're talking about.

I guess you can ignore his sniffing and probing young girls the first 10 or so times he does it but after awhile it becomes societally imperative to notice...out loud. It's creepy. I'm going to tell you it's creepy. You don't like people noticing, eh? Well then...I'm starting to wonder about you too.

I love how guys like Robo/Rebound (who even if they aren't the same guy speak with the same mind) do this one where they deflect from the topic, introducing a topic like slavery then when you respond they accuse you of deflecting. Now as to Obama announcing his candidacy in terrorist bomber Bill Ayers living room RR did something similar. I didn't see anything in the OP specifically saying it was the candidacy for President that Obama announced in terrorist bomber Bill Ayers living room. It wasn't but RR goes off like he has some tremendous gotcha by confusing the candidacy for president with Obama being announced as entering the political arena as a candidate for Senator, thus starting his political career. It happened like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Ayers_2008_presidential_election_controversy

Sniffy strikes again. He just can't seem to control himself.

No he didn't. He was more likely sipping chardonnay on a yacht in the Riviera while the grunt journalist at the Wall Street Journal (America's most trusted new organization) expressed the belief Biden's plea to the Saudi's not to cut back on oil production before the midterms was political. But if you don't like that interpretation, by all means show me some media source you prefer saying something you find more credible. I'm not afraid to consider it. I don't understand why you're trembling so at what the Wall Street Journal has to say that you're slipping into personal slurs again.

I quoted that whole rambling diversion to show how desperate you seem to be to avoid the actual question. In case you forgot as you were busy frothing at the mouth going off in multiple directions it was 'can you show me how the lockdowns were anymore severe in January of 2021 than they were in January of 2022.' Because if you can't then your contention Trump's 2.50 gas at the end of his term being lower than Biden's 3.90 gas currently doesn't matter is like your last post. A lot of puffed up diversionary nonsense.

So you're objecting to the Daily Mail citing the Wall Street Journal as a news source is that it? You don't want them citing these guys: Very well, did you have what you view as a more credible source saying something that contradicts the most trusted news organization by Americans saying the Saudis did not reject Biden's admonitions? Of course you don't so I imagine you are interpreting the opinion claiming the pleas from Biden were politically motivated were something coming directly from Rubert Murdoch. Any evidence of that? Again, of course not. So really, you don't have much of a point, do you?

Are you saying shut downs in January of 2021 were worse than in January of 2022? Show me what you're talking about. I don't believe you.

When did Murdoch buy the Daily Mail? Is that something that only happened in Reboundsville? Pleased to hear the sun rises every morning there too, though. Does it still rise in the east there or is there some special Prog elite command to the sun to rise in the west in your little special "progressive" place of the mind.

And it was under 2.50 when Trump left office, so what's your point? And here's some more on this: Biden administration urged Saudi Arabia to wait until after the midterms to cut oil production And apparently the Saudis refused. They'll cut oil production. Biden can't even work a scam properly.

Careful...that's another observation of the obvious. Mikey tends to want cites for those.

See, that's another one of those, "cite how water is wet" demands you insist on making. They're silly. After you've seen a few they're not worth responding to.

Speaking of BS terms, I have a problem with that one too. It isn't that it's untrue. It's that it's redundant.

What's a "Constitutional Nobody" by the way? It's interesting. I'd like to know who made that little bit of a BS term up. Was it you Robo or did you hear it somewhere?